Man Shot in London

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

tommywishbone

Platinum Member
May 11, 2005
2,149
0
0
Perhaps we could avoid personal attacks? Someone admires the police...fine. When the police murder people, I don't admire them, but I'll not insult and attack you for your position. Thank you.

...terrorist apologist? I'm not sure what that means. It was some guy going to work, riding the subway and he was murdered.
 

replicator

Senior member
Oct 7, 2003
431
0
0
Who needs terrorists? It seems the paranoia of the people will eventually cause them to terrorize themselves.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: cwjerome

You are the poster child of the Daft Left. If there is such a thing as karma, I hope you're in a situation where you need one of those "pigs" in the worst way, and they are nowhere to be found...

This is exactly why the Libs have a bad name, because 9 times out of 10 their kneejerk reaction is to damn, whine about, and attack those whose job it is to lay their life on the line to deal with criminals and terrorists. P&N as a whole is a shining example of a group of people who can sit back and repeatedly lay tidal waves of accusations and insults to everyone EXCEPT the evil we face.

I admire the brave professionals who pursued this questionable idiot thinking that at any second he could detonate a bomb. And from where I stand, they were completely justified in taking him out. Every bit of evidence suggests this character was involved in a terror network, and I support the those Brits involved... people who were put in an incredibly chaotic situation and acted in defense of civilians.

You terrorist apologists favorite game of bashing those actually dealing with evil threats on the front line is a sick reminder to everyone the demented state of your psychology. You'll say nothing impuning the fcked-up bombers and their supporters, yet will unleash endless, revolting tirades about any failures, warts, or efforts by our governments to deal with and respond to the deranged b@stards.

Ahem.

I'm unaware of even one scintilla of evidence to indicate this man was involved in any terror network, and indeed Scotland Yard has specifically announced he was innocent of any crime, and apologized for his death. What evidence, specifically, are you referring to?
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,238
136
Darwin Award anyone?

Damn crappy situation, but for a guy (non-white at that...) to be running away from the police, into and through a tube station the day after a second round of suicide bombings were attempted, was the height of stupidity.

Put it into context; suicide bombers had failed to blow themselves up the day before, knew they were caught on security cameras and left tons of evidence behind, it was reasonable for the police to think these guys would try to attack again and kill themselves before they were caught by the police. It certainly was what I was thinking. Acoording to the BBC:

1: Jean Charles de Menezes leaves a house under surveillance and arrives at Stockwell station
2: Witnesses say he vaults the automatic ticket barriers and heads for the platforms
3: He then ran down an escalator after being approached by up to 20 plain-clothed police officers and tried to board a train
4: He apparently refuses to obey police instructions and after running onto a northbound Northern line train, he is shot dead

Now, the're tailing a guy they think was involved, he manages blow past security and run into the subways (a police huge error, but ultimately irrevelent) and refuses to heed commands to stop? Shoot the idiot before he has a change to possibly kill many, many people. Put yourself it that situation, what would you have done if you were the cops? Imagine you are one of those standing in the train, seeing some guy bolting for your train with screaming police in tow? What if he is a bomber? Will the police stop him before he gets to you and kills you all?
If he was who they thought, they all would have been heroes. Now they are all villains?
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,238
136
Originally posted by: Phokus
Originally posted by: Hafen
One way to get around that no-death penalty thing there. Too bad, he deserved a lot worse than that.

:disgust:


Here's a CCTV picture of the guy just before he was shot dead. Yeah, that looks like a 'winter coat' alright.

:disgust:

http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2005/WORLD/europe/07/23/london.tube/story.cctv1.ap.jpg

LONDON, England (CNN) -- Police say the man they shot dead at a London Underground station "was not connected" with this week's attempted bombings on the city's transit system.

"For somebody to lose their life in such circumstances is a tragedy and one that the Metropolitan Police Service regrets," the police statement said Saturday.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/07/23/london.tube/index.html

I doubt we'll see any repugs come in here and apologize. (COUGH *TLC, IMWINCUR, DBL, HAFEN* COUGH)

PM FROM PHOCKUS:
Don't you feel stupid now?

Here's a CCTV picture of the guy just before he was shot dead. Yeah, that looks like a 'winter coat' alright.

http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2005/WORLD/europe/07/23/london.tube/story.cctv1.ap.jpg

quote:
LONDON, England (CNN) -- Police say the man they shot dead at a London Underground station was not connected with this week's attempted bombings on the city's transit system.

For somebody to lose their life in such circumstances is a tragedy and one that the Metropolitan Police Service regrets, the police statement said Saturday.

http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview...&STARTPAGE=2&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear


DON'T PM ME WITH YOUR CRAP. IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY, LEAVE IT IN THE FORUMS. NEXT TIME YOU WILL BE REPORTED TO THE MODS

Look at the time that was posted fool. That was the current information being reported.
And what, not having a knee-jerk "damn the pigs" reaction suddenly makes me a repug? Please. At least have the decency to go read some of my other positions before you call me out as anything. Your actions and statements exhibit the intellectual integrity of a 20 year old.
Have some respect for those who risk their lives in order to defend yours and who get very little in return.
 

Duckzilla

Senior member
Nov 16, 2004
430
0
0
Originally posted by: Hafen
Darwin Award anyone?

Damn crappy situation, but for a guy (non-white at that...) to be running away from the police, into and through a tube station the day after a second round of suicide bombings were attempted, was the height of stupidity.

Put it into context; suicide bombers had failed to blow themselves up the day before, knew they were caught on security cameras and left tons of evidence behind, it was reasonable for the police to think these guys would try to attack again and kill themselves before they were caught by the police. It certainly was what I was thinking. Acoording to the BBC:

1: Jean Charles de Menezes leaves a house under surveillance and arrives at Stockwell station
2: Witnesses say he vaults the automatic ticket barriers and heads for the platforms
3: He then ran down an escalator after being approached by up to 20 plain-clothed police officers and tried to board a train
4: He apparently refuses to obey police instructions and after running onto a northbound Northern line train, he is shot dead

Now, the're tailing a guy they think was involved, he manages blow past security and run into the subways (a police huge error, but ultimately irrevelent) and refuses to heed commands to stop? Shoot the idiot before he has a change to possibly kill many, many people. Put yourself it that situation, what would you have done if you were the cops? Imagine you are one of those standing in the train, seeing some guy bolting for your train with screaming police in tow? What if he is a bomber? Will the police stop him before he gets to you and kills you all?
If he was who they thought, they all would have been heroes. Now they are all villains?


I think you have summed up the situation quite nicely. This is how rational people see it.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: Hafen

DON'T PM ME WITH YOUR CRAP. IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY, LEAVE IT IN THE FORUMS. NEXT TIME YOU WILL BE REPORTED TO THE MODS

"Reported to the mods" for what? Posting PMs without permission is dirty pool, and you make yourself look like a real prick by doing it.
 

replicator

Senior member
Oct 7, 2003
431
0
0
Originally posted by: Hafen
Darwin Award anyone?

Damn crappy situation, but for a guy (non-white at that...) to be running away from the police, into and through a tube station the day after a second round of suicide bombings were attempted, was the height of stupidity.

Put it into context; suicide bombers had failed to blow themselves up the day before, knew they were caught on security cameras and left tons of evidence behind, it was reasonable for the police to think these guys would try to attack again and kill themselves before they were caught by the police. It certainly was what I was thinking. Acoording to the BBC:

1: Jean Charles de Menezes leaves a house under surveillance and arrives at Stockwell station
2: Witnesses say he vaults the automatic ticket barriers and heads for the platforms
3: He then ran down an escalator after being approached by up to 20 plain-clothed police officers and tried to board a train
4: He apparently refuses to obey police instructions and after running onto a northbound Northern line train, he is shot dead

Now, the're tailing a guy they think was involved, he manages blow past security and run into the subways (a police huge error, but ultimately irrevelent) and refuses to heed commands to stop? Shoot the idiot before he has a change to possibly kill many, many people. Put yourself it that situation, what would you have done if you were the cops? Imagine you are one of those standing in the train, seeing some guy bolting for your train with screaming police in tow? What if he is a bomber? Will the police stop him before he gets to you and kills you all?
If he was who they thought, they all would have been heroes. Now they are all villains?


1. Obviously Jean Charles de Menezes did not know the house he lived in was under surveillance. This wasn't his fault.

2. Witnesses reportedly said many things. I'm sure there are CCTV cameras at the barriers yet they haven't shown any of him jumping them. Some witnesses also claimed to have seen 'wires' coming out of his jacket, but there is no evidence to my knowledge released that show this was true.

3. 20 plain-clothed, meaning UNDERCOVER. How is he to know who they really are?

4. "Apparently" is the key word


Shooting people in the head on the basis of suspicion, without even having ID'd the person is a critical mistake. They should have at least intercepted him as he exited the residence if they were keeping it under surveillance.
 

cwjerome

Diamond Member
Sep 30, 2004
4,346
26
81
Originally posted by: arsbanned
And you, Mr. Dumas, are what give the neocons a bad name. As if your rhetoric isn't completely over-the-top.
They were NOT justified in taking him out. He was innocent and had nothing whatsoever to do with those bombings. It was a mistake and they have apologized. They are not saying there was justification for murdering the guy. Only wacknuts like you are.

What exactly is over the top? That I stand by the London authorities? That's reeeeally out there :roll:

I will say that my post wasn't properly worded, in that I was speaking about what the officials thought was happening (with good reason), and I was not basing it on what we now know. Yes, it seems he was "innocent."

I do not think they have apologized. It WAS regretable and they should take responsibility, but I -along with them- believe it was justifiable. There were doing their job, and I don't fault them based on the evidence. Some of you bleeding hearts want to talk about police "pigs" as if they are deprave thugs who relish in murdering innocent people and use this as an opportunity to make your anti-Bush/Blair points, but judged in context, this episode was totally unfortunate but entirely understandable- to a serious thinking person that is...
 

cwjerome

Diamond Member
Sep 30, 2004
4,346
26
81
Originally posted by: Duckzilla
Originally posted by: Hafen
Darwin Award anyone?

Damn crappy situation, but for a guy (non-white at that...) to be running away from the police, into and through a tube station the day after a second round of suicide bombings were attempted, was the height of stupidity.

Put it into context; suicide bombers had failed to blow themselves up the day before, knew they were caught on security cameras and left tons of evidence behind, it was reasonable for the police to think these guys would try to attack again and kill themselves before they were caught by the police. It certainly was what I was thinking. Acoording to the BBC:

1: Jean Charles de Menezes leaves a house under surveillance and arrives at Stockwell station
2: Witnesses say he vaults the automatic ticket barriers and heads for the platforms
3: He then ran down an escalator after being approached by up to 20 plain-clothed police officers and tried to board a train
4: He apparently refuses to obey police instructions and after running onto a northbound Northern line train, he is shot dead

Now, the're tailing a guy they think was involved, he manages blow past security and run into the subways (a police huge error, but ultimately irrevelent) and refuses to heed commands to stop? Shoot the idiot before he has a change to possibly kill many, many people. Put yourself it that situation, what would you have done if you were the cops? Imagine you are one of those standing in the train, seeing some guy bolting for your train with screaming police in tow? What if he is a bomber? Will the police stop him before he gets to you and kills you all?
If he was who they thought, they all would have been heroes. Now they are all villains?


I think you have summed up the situation quite nicely. This is how rational people see it.

Exactly.

 

CaptnKirk

Lifer
Jul 25, 2002
10,053
0
71
1: Jean Charles de Menezes leaves a house under surveillance and arrives at Stockwell station


Correction to the survielance thing:

1: Jean Charles de Menezes leaves a house in a neighborhood where immigration had surveilance underway.
Another nearby house in the same neighborhood was under surveillance for alledged ties to terrorist bombing suspects in previous attacks.

Communications breakdown, paranoia sets in, panic ensues, man looses his mind.
 

boran

Golden Member
Jun 17, 2001
1,526
0
76
So the moral of the story is, never wear anything not fitting to the wheater, stay in line, dont stand out of the crowd, never run away from armed men (whom might or might not be police men)

imho every single person here saying that the police was right to shoot him with the current data is a fascist. I ask to them the question, should we shoot everyone who is wearing a raincoat and backpack ? because that is what you guys say. and imho running away from armed people is a quite natural and instinctive reaction, even when they're cops, shooting this guy was in no way justified. if they had him under surveilance they could at least have found out the things they have found out now (no connection to the bombers, no terrorist) and acted differently.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
Originally posted by: Duckzilla
Originally posted by: Hafen
Darwin Award anyone?

Damn crappy situation, but for a guy (non-white at that...) to be running away from the police, into and through a tube station the day after a second round of suicide bombings were attempted, was the height of stupidity.

Put it into context; suicide bombers had failed to blow themselves up the day before, knew they were caught on security cameras and left tons of evidence behind, it was reasonable for the police to think these guys would try to attack again and kill themselves before they were caught by the police. It certainly was what I was thinking. Acoording to the BBC:

1: Jean Charles de Menezes leaves a house under surveillance and arrives at Stockwell station
2: Witnesses say he vaults the automatic ticket barriers and heads for the platforms
3: He then ran down an escalator after being approached by up to 20 plain-clothed police officers and tried to board a train
4: He apparently refuses to obey police instructions and after running onto a northbound Northern line train, he is shot dead

Now, the're tailing a guy they think was involved, he manages blow past security and run into the subways (a police huge error, but ultimately irrevelent) and refuses to heed commands to stop? Shoot the idiot before he has a change to possibly kill many, many people. Put yourself it that situation, what would you have done if you were the cops? Imagine you are one of those standing in the train, seeing some guy bolting for your train with screaming police in tow? What if he is a bomber? Will the police stop him before he gets to you and kills you all?
If he was who they thought, they all would have been heroes. Now they are all villains?


I think you have summed up the situation quite nicely. This is how rational people see it.

my thoughts exactly,
i was at penn station yesterday when it got evacuated and I promise you if i clenched my backpack and ran towards a police officer screaming allahu akbar, the nearest national guardsmen would pop me in about 2 seconds. And i'm blonde hair blue eyed european.

Considering the circumstances, running away from the police, into the subway wearing suspicious clothes is less than smart thing to do
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
0
Originally posted by: boran
So the moral of the story is, never wear anything not fitting to the wheater, stay in line, dont stand out of the crowd, never run away from armed men (whom might or might not be police men)

imho every single person here saying that the police was right to shoot him with the current data is a fascist. I ask to them the question, should we shoot everyone who is wearing a raincoat and backpack ? because that is what you guys say. and imho running away from armed people is a quite natural and instinctive reaction, even when they're cops, shooting this guy was in no way justified. if they had him under surveilance they could at least have found out the things they have found out now (no connection to the bombers, no terrorist) and acted differently.

yeah,
the day after the second series of bomb attacks in the subway, running thru a security checkpoint and away from the armed men stationed at the check point is a natural thing to do :roll:

And no, we will shoot the people that are dressed like suicide bombers and run away from police and security check points. Maybe use your fvcking head and think of what your actions come off to people.
 

arsbanned

Banned
Dec 12, 2003
4,853
0
0
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Originally posted by: arsbanned
And you, Mr. Dumas, are what give the neocons a bad name. As if your rhetoric isn't completely over-the-top.
They were NOT justified in taking him out. He was innocent and had nothing whatsoever to do with those bombings. It was a mistake and they have apologized. They are not saying there was justification for murdering the guy. Only wacknuts like you are.

What exactly is over the top? That I stand by the London authorities? That's reeeeally out there :roll:

I will say that my post wasn't properly worded, in that I was speaking about what the officials thought was happening (with good reason), and I was not basing it on what we now know. Yes, it seems he was "innocent."

I do not think they have apologized. It WAS regretable and they should take responsibility, but I -along with them- believe it was justifiable. There were doing their job, and I don't fault them based on the evidence. Some of you bleeding hearts want to talk about police "pigs" as if they are deprave thugs who relish in murdering innocent people and use this as an opportunity to make your anti-Bush/Blair points, but judged in context, this episode was totally unfortunate but entirely understandable- to a serious thinking person that is...

I'm not going to take some of your quotes out to prove that your rhetoric can be pretty poisonous. If you want to deny it, fine.
"We are all desperately sorry for the death of an innocent person and I understand entirely the feelings of the young man's family," Blair told a press conference.
Sounds like an apology to me. You must define apologies differently. Whatever.
I don't feel the cops murdered the guy or that they are "pigs" so don't put words in my mouth.
However, a mistake was made. Stop trying to persist in painting him as a terrorist.
 

Deudalus

Golden Member
Jan 16, 2005
1,090
0
0
I still can't see how this is really breaking news to be honest.

People in America are shot every single day for running from the cops. If you run from the cops and they have reason to believe you are armed and dangerous they can shoot to kill at any time here in the states.

Why should we expect any less from a country that was just bombed?

I'm sorry but if you are wearing a heavy coat in July, running from a cops, doing your best to get ONTO a subway car which is obviously the terrorists first choice to blow up, then you deserve what you get.
 

Hacp

Lifer
Jun 8, 2005
13,923
2
81
Maybe he didn't know they were cops? They were in plain clothes, therefore not easily seen as cops. Any gang can say their the cops, then beat the crap out of you and steal your money. There is still no official picture of the person, so we do not know if he had a heavy coat or wires stickign outside of him. IMO, the best think the police can do right now is give his family monetary compensation. Along with the apology.

If the government makes a mistake, and it affects your life, you should be rewarded with damages.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Originally posted by: Deudalus
I still can't see how this is really breaking news to be honest.

People in America are shot every single day for running from the cops. If you run from the cops and they have reason to believe you are armed and dangerous they can shoot to kill at any time here in the states.

Why should we expect any less from a country that was just bombed?

I'm sorry but if you are wearing a heavy coat in July, running from a cops, doing your best to get ONTO a subway car which is obviously the terrorists first choice to blow up, then you deserve what you get.

I can't see how it wouldn't make the news. Cops restraining someone and shooting them 7 times in the head is not a normal thing.
 

Proletariat

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2004
5,614
0
0
I think the most important part of this is that the entire nation of Brazil is upset. All of the major newspapers had VERY damning headlines.

And to those who say they are just anti-Western leftists - Brazilians in fact had a great respect for the UK authorities as many here seem to espouse. The UK and Brazilian police had a cross-training thing going on.

I hope they do a full investigation... if this guy was a criminal and had a criminal record this whole thing can be taken in a different light. But if he was a law-abiding young guy as his family says this is very suspicious.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: Proletariat

I hope they do a full investigation... if this guy was a criminal and had a criminal record this whole thing can be taken in a different light. But if he was a law-abiding young guy as his family says this is very suspicious.

I don't see the relevance of his criminal record.

Even if he were Brazil's version of Ted Bundy, it would have nothing to do with the reason for and manner of his death at the hands of the police. He died because they suspected him of being a Middle Eastern terrorist, not a Brazilian burglar or purse-snatcher.
 

cumhail

Senior member
Apr 1, 2003
682
0
0
Heck, why even bother oneself with proof of anything... Just go with the "he must have been guilty of something approach, and it's all much easier to dismiss.

cumhail
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |