Originally posted by: cwjerome
Originally posted by: arsbanned
And you, Mr. Dumas, are what give the neocons a bad name. As if your rhetoric isn't completely over-the-top.
They were NOT justified in taking him out. He was innocent and had nothing whatsoever to do with those bombings. It was a mistake and they have apologized. They are not saying there was justification for murdering the guy. Only wacknuts like you are.
What exactly is over the top? That I stand by the London authorities? That's reeeeally out there :roll:
I will say that my post wasn't properly worded, in that I was speaking about what the officials thought was happening (with good reason), and I was not basing it on what we now know. Yes, it seems he was "innocent."
I do not think they have
apologized. It WAS regretable and they should take responsibility, but I -along with them- believe it was justifiable. There were doing their job, and I don't fault them based on the evidence. Some of you bleeding hearts want to talk about police "pigs" as if they are deprave thugs who relish in murdering innocent people and use this as an opportunity to make your anti-Bush/Blair points, but judged in context, this episode was totally unfortunate but entirely understandable- to a serious thinking person that is...