- Oct 25, 2004
- 5,727
- 1
- 0
I like Survivor Man because he plays it safe and smart. I mean, he's by himself and it's natural. Man v Wild shows some stuff that's cool as sh!t, but he's reckless. Which one's better?
Originally posted by: Alienwho
Man vs Wild is BS, you know those camera guys are handing him power bars on the side. Survivorman's got nobody. If he dies, they won't know for a week.
Originally posted by: msparish
I like Man vs Wild much better. However, it is practically useless as an actual survival show...99.99% of people have no prayer of being able to do what Bear does.
Originally posted by: Kelvrick
Originally posted by: msparish
I like Man vs Wild much better. However, it is practically useless as an actual survival show...99.99% of people have no prayer of being able to do what Bear does.
WTF? I'll have you know that I certainly can pee on my shirt and wrap it around my head to keep me cool, as well as squeeze elephant crap water into my mouth.
Please, I have teh hand-mouth-squeeze-penis-wrapping coordination of the highest level.
Originally posted by: patentman
Survivor man caught a freaking rabbit with wire from a plane hull, ate the entire inside and made gloves out of the hide, all with a simulated broken arm. No question, survivor man rules.
Originally posted by: NanoStuff
MvW certainly has a more diverse range of situation, and an objective, but you can't escape the lack of authenticity. Survivorman FTW.