"Inciting violence" has a more specific legal and practical meaning. An offensive speech falls far short from it. I have no doubt the arm band dude is deluded, bigoted, or both. But the remedy against bigoted speech cannot be a private violence. With 300+ million people living with vastly differing views in a country, if people start taking offensive speakers to their own devices, then we no longer live under a rule of law. And it does not leave much to imagination who will be the victims under such a regime.
Does that mean our citizenry is helpless against the lunatics spreading offensive speech? No. It is somewhat cliche'd, but an answer to an offensive speech is more (counter) speech. If that does not seem satisfactory to you, there are other means as well: Public shunning is one. (like what we do on this board) Boycotting is another. If he is employed, you can write to his employer exposing his abhorrent views and ask his employer to do his civic duty of disciplining him. Heck, if all of this seems too cumbersome, you could just walk up to him and scorn him loudly for his antisocial ideas (without uttering fighting words).
But punching him in the face? Do you really believe that is an appropriate answer to an offensive speech in a liberal democracy like ours?
Choice selection of words there. Do you really think a call for genocide is just "offensive speech?"
You're also arguing against something that was never said by me. I don't believe punching him in the face is an "appropriate answer" but then again I couldn't care less what happens to a neo Nazi. This is what I said:
ITT: Nazis deserve the right to call and incite for the genocide of people because "first amendment rights."
I don't remember who said this but if the best argument for your case is "first amendment rights" then you really don't have anything of substance to add to the discussion and you'd be best off not making yourself look like an idiot defending neo Nazis (you know, the people who are advocating the killing of semites and minorities).
This is what you said:
Boldly claiming Nazi beliefs is inciting violence?
I thought that was hilarious and I wanted to know what you thought Nazis believed in. Do you think it's acceptable to wear a Swastika armband in public knowing full well what the Nazis did? Instead of sugar coating it as "offensive speech" maybe you'd like to take another crack at what this emboldened idiot was trying to do.