Actually espn did this stats ananlysis like only they can, where they broke down and compiled every single stat for a QB (past and present). They analyzed every QB's complete season statistic and gave it a their new and improved QB rating. And according to their data, Kurt warners 2 amazing seasons (MVP both years i think) was the only QB to break top ten in this list twice.
Meaning Kurt warner is a very good QB, just needs a particular kind of offense, the lighting fast kind. So I would not put him in the same category as ben r, or trent dilfer. Its a shame he got screwed by the rams after his injury. Its funny how QB's who are replaced by their backups lose all their confidence and never perform again (drew brees is the exception this year).
But remember drew bledsaw, before he got hurt and replaced by tom brady during the pats 1st SB win, his stats in his first 10years in the league were among the best of all time. Now he is replaced by butterfingers Romo.
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: slsmnaz
1 ring to zero so I might have to agree. Peyton is 1 step ahead
Didn't take long for this tired argument to come out...
Q: What do Ben Rothlesberger, Trent Dilfer, Kurt Warner, Mark Rypien, Jeff Hostetler, Doug Williams, Jim McMann, and Joe Namath all have in common?
A: They all won Superbowls despite being average or sub-par quarterbacks.
Football is a team sport. Marino spent nearly his entire career on teams with no running game or defense.