Marriage Trolls

[EyeMWing]

<flame on>
A lot of responses in here show just how far in the past so many nerds live. You'd think that dealing so heavily in the technology, they'd be more accepting of it's application to different aspects of life. But no. AT'ers, on the whole, are just plain, normal males who jerk off to Jessica Alba and refuse to acknoweldge that a relationship can exist based on anything other than if she makes your peen stand on end or not. You people make me sick.

Sure, it's unusual that they were engaged before even talking on the phone - but is it THAT difficult to wrap your head around? You can communicate just as well in text as you can in other mediums if you're willing to try and to trust. That must be it - you all have trust issues. I see it every damned time a thread comes up relating in any way, shape or form to a woman. You're all pathetic and if there is any justice, will die alone.

This isn't the first wedding thread AT'ers have crapped up for various reasons, and unfortunately, I don't see it being the last.
<flame off>

Well, that was refreshing.

 

[dug777]

:Q

easy tiger?

 

 

[imported_Snagle]

Originally posted by: jumpr

 

[Wallydraigle]

Obligatory "Tell us how you really feel" post.

 

[jjones]

Get a wife.

 

[jspeicher]

they will be divorced in t-minus 7 months and counting.

 

[EyeMWing]

Originally posted by: dug777
:Q

easy tiger?

It's one of those god damn basic rules of life - you don't crap on people's engagements and weddings unless you were gunning for the position yourself. It's a cheap shot, it's disgusting, it's wrong, and is probably a castratable offense in third world countries.

 

[SSP]

Most of the idiot trolls will be gone once school starts. Summers are pretty bad in AT land.

 

[AnyMal]

Originally posted by: jspeicher
they will be divorced in t-minus 7 months and counting.

speaking from personal experience?

 

[dug777]

Originally posted by: EyeMWing

Originally posted by: dug777
:Q

easy tiger?

It's one of those god damn basic rules of life - you don't crap on people's engagements and weddings unless you were gunning for the position yourself. It's a cheap shot, it's disgusting, it's wrong, and is probably a castratable offense in third world countries.

:Q I'm glad i didn't then...

*calls it a night on ATOT*

 

[CKent]

Originally posted by: EyeMWing
AT'ers, on the whole, are just plain, normal males

If ATOT represented normal males we'd have a matriarchal society.

 

[Dragnov]

Really, what did you expect from ATOT w/ such a post? You're choice is to just ignore it or making a thread like this which will just exacerbate even more.

Btw, congrat to hotchic.

 

[LikeLinus]

1. No one needs "authority" to post on any topic. This is an open forum on a public website.

2. If they didn't want people voicing their opinions...they shouldn't have posted on ATOT in OFFTOPIC. This place is known for everyone voicing their opinions.

3. Why is their opinion wrong and yours not? Why are you any better than then? You flame these people for flaming someone who post about their marrage in Offtopic? Do you realize you're nothing more than a hypocrite calling people down because they have an opinion different than yours? Not to mention post count has absolutely nothing to do with this.

 

[EyeMWing]

Originally posted by: RBachman

Originally posted by: EyeMWing
AT'ers, on the whole, are just plain, normal males

If ATOT represented normal males we'd have a matriarchal society.

In attitude, not in practice. I know damn well they crumble at the sight of an actual female, but they like to pretend to be wife-beating badasses.

 

[loup garou]

Oh STFU you greasy haired loser.

 

[dxkj]

thanks for editing

 

[mrsdxkj]

I guess I didn't phrase my question correctly. I was simply asking whether they dated versus courted. I was not questioning the legitimacy of their relationship.

 

[yllus]

I very much doubt the newlyweds would appreciate you putting a new spotlight on those who wish to pooh-pooh their happiness.

mrsdxkj, speaking of pathetic - it's very sad that you registered just to post what you did. Perhaps you and dxkj might need to re-evaluate how you spend your quality time together before criticizing others.

 

[EyeMWing]

Originally posted by: LikeLinus
1. No one needs "authority" to post on any topic. This is an open forum on a public website.

2. If they didn't want people voicing their opinions...they shouldn't have posted on ATOT in OFFTOPIC. This place is known for everyone voicing their opinions.

3. Why is their opinion wrong and yours not? Why are you any better than then? You flame these people for flaming someone who post about their marrage in Offtopic? Do you realize you're nothing more than a hypocrite calling people down because they have an opinion different than yours? Not to mention post count has absolutely nothing to do with this.

1. Postcount and join date have a lot to do with this, since it deals with the personal lives of other members. If you've been around for a month and posted twice, you're probably going to know a hell of a lot less than someone who's been around for 2 years and 11k posts - and I STILL know next to nothing.

2. How about sharing the news with the place that got it all started in the first place? Wouldn't you want [all 30 people who are still around from that era] to know that in some small part, they contributed?

3. This is why it's in a seperate thread.

 

[LikeLinus]

Originally posted by: mrsdxkj

Originally posted by: EyeMWing

Originally posted by: mrsdxkj

Originally posted by: HotChic


To the trolls - please keep out. We knew each other in person longer than many couples who get married. Why do you care what we met or how we courted?

Did you guys truely court each other?

I guess I didn't phrase my question correctly. I was simply asking whether they dated versus courted. I was not questioning the legitimacy of their relationship.

ok lets be honest here....they got engaged before ever even talking on the phone or meeting. Do you really think they know how to have a normal relationship and court each other? lol

I'm going to bet he didn't ask her father for permission to marry his daughter either. just a guess though

 

[dxkj]

My question on the clarification was engaged vs courtship.


They had mentioned they courted, which can be translated to engaged (as most courtships only begin if you have the intention of marrying at the end, assuming everything works out fine). You dont court for fun, you court with the intention of marrying. I believe that is all Mrs. Dxkj was trying to ascertain.

So if they were courting before they talked on the phone, vs were engaged before talking on the phone, it would be a whole different ballgame.



edited: clarified misunderstanding with OP




edited: clarified misunderstanding with OP

 

[EyeMWing]

Originally posted by: yllus
I very much doubt the newlyweds would appreciate you putting a new spotlight on those who wish to pooh-pooh their happiness.

mrsdxkj, speaking of pathetic - it's very sad that you registered just to post what you did. Perhaps you and dxkj might need to re-evaluate how you spend your quality time together before criticizing others.

If they do care, it can go away with a few clicks by me or a mod. But as with all my threads, this one will quickly degenerate into

Originally posted by: werk
Oh STFU you greasy haired loser.

repeated 10,000x over (nevermind that I'm bald)

 

[dug777]

*rolls out the barbie and asks his gf to bring out his hilarious apron*

:beer: anyone, the steaks will be 10 mins or so, the BBQ is only just getting hot

 

[Pepsei]

to be honest, that part where they got engaged before ever even talking on the phone or meeting is strange. however, it took what, 4 years to get married, that's a good period of time to get to know each other. I suppose "engaged" is just a label that can be withdrawn at anytime in this case.

as long as they're happy, good for them.