Originally posted by: lyssword
Originally posted by: Babbles
Originally posted by: lyssword
Originally posted by: Babbles
Posting martial arts threads on ATOT is just asking for an onslaught of clueless e-knoweldge, much like this gem:
Originally posted by: Iron Addict
Most effective in real life is Jiujitsu and second is Muay Thai...
I think you should just go around to various dojo and check out the classes and talk with the instructor and base your decision off of that as opposed to the typical "OMG Muay Thai and Krav Maga rock!'
I would think Aikido would be great for your kids, but on the other hand I also know very little about Okinawan Karate.
As another snide comment, I am usually leery of people and/or associations that can not spell "jujutsu" correctly - even though in a somewhat ironic sense people will usually spell things like "judo" and "kenjutsu" correctly, but put "ju" and "jutsu" together and you find a whole slew of spellings.
Its Jiu Juitsu, and yes it owns. Basically an advanced form of submission grappling, and they also learn some strikes too.
When you use the phrase "they also learn" that necessarily implies that you have no experience yourself in it. Like any martial art, there is a lot more to it than what most people think. I'm not so sure what one would mean by "advanced form" of things, but sure there is grappling and submission but it is not really all about grappling. In fact I would say that grappling is a more minor constituent of jujutsu, however again it is not entirely absent either. In fact I think there are probably more 'strikes' in jujutsu than grappling, but that could also due to me simply not knowing as many grappling techniques as I do punching ones.
Furthermore, yes it is indeed "jujutsu" and to put it frankly if you have been told otherwise, then they were wrong. There is indeed an official guide to Romanizing the Japanese language (Romanji); 'jutsu' and 'jitsu' are completely different words.
But, with that being said, unfortunately things like 'juijitsu' are used extensively; regardless, that does not make it right
LINK I just quickly Googled up for your reading pleausure.
My twin bro is taking Brazilian Jiu Juitsu atm (3 months now), it is mostly grappling, and some striking like the boxing. BJJ participants are not allowed to strike in Tournaments (though allowed to spar with boxing gloves/headgear) or they will have too many injuries. Unless its MMA tournament or something. My bro already has a lot of minor injuries just from grappling.
Words of my brother "Jiu Juitsu is mostly grappling, although most (BJJ schools) teach strikes as well". He has been interested in martial arts and MMA for 7+ years now, he was wrestling in High School too.
Now I'm talking about Brazilian Jiu Juitsu. "Regular Jiu Juitsu is not very effective, unless you want to go against 90yr old lady"-at least thats what Sherdog ppl say according to my bro.
What is different with Brazilian Jiu Juitsu is training methods, they go hands on, live opponents practicing their moves, not just striking air. Training method is similar to Judo but more focused on the ground. You won't learn much if you don't go against actual opponent. For example if boxer trains for 6 months and other trains in traditional Karate for 6 months, the boxer will demolish the karate guy (according to Bill Wallace who is a many time kickboxing/karate champion in 70's).
Good striking arts are boxing, Muay Thai, kickboxing or other fullcontact arts.
Brazilian Jiu Juitsu roots are from Japanese judoka, submission wrestling and modified further by Brazilians (Gracies) from 1920's onward with more ground focus