Originally posted by: atom
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: atom
Originally posted by: Vic
In the end, it's a matter of preference. And I prefer my martinis to be vodka, 3 olives, no vermouth.
Isn't that kind of like saying, "I want a Jack and Coke, but no coke in it."?
No, it's like saying that you want a Jack and Pepsi. Or (better analogy) that you prefer a Jim Beam and Coke.
In your example you are replacing an ingredient, not taking a whole ingredient out.
Oh, I see, you're talking about the no vermouth.
It's actually not a requirement for a martini, and a common preferernce. I first started drinking them that way after I saw a Discovery channel documentary on the origins of the martini. One martini expert and New York City historian that they interviewed said that the original martinis did not actually contain vermouth. So I tried them that way and found that I actually prefer it. I've never liked vermouth.
BTW, it is important for a vodka martini to be shaken because it makes it colder (which is important to taste) and vodka is not "bruised." OTOH, a gin martini must be stirred, because it doesn't need to be as cold to taste good and gin can be bruised. The original Bond martini contained "Three measures of Gordon's (gin), one of vodka, half a measure of Kina Lillet (vermouth). Shake it very well until it's ice-cold, then add a large thin slice of lemon-peel."
edit: when shaking, vodka is not "bruised," but gin is. Bruising is when air molecules are absorbed into the liquid.