Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen - Anyone else agree to this?

[RadioactiveCPU]

Hey let's see if we can get this thread in the high numbers so we can get it on the most responded to threads!

 

[KeyserSoze]

Sweet Ti*s, this is funny.


If you do a search, you can find some pretty funny sites with people that agree with you RADIOACTIVECPU. For fear of people thinking that I'm sort of psycho, I won't post any linkx.



KeyserSoze

 

[johneetrash]

lori laughlin a hottie? while she isnt bad looking (if you like older ladies) i dont think she's hot... to each and their own i guess (thats the quote right i forget )

 

[yoyo25]

my old roomate has seen every episode of "Two of a Kind", which means I have seen most of em too..I liked the babysitter more!

 

[daveman]

<< Here is the countdown!!!!!

hahaha, only 1045 days, 9 hours, 10 minutes, and 9 seconds left! >>



lol

 

[kcklla]

well I dont think there all that good looking but if something like that ever come out I think I would take a peek:Q

 

[mrCide]

those girls are older than some people on these forums..

someone who's 18 to look at a 15 year old isn't a big deal.. now.. you 25-30 year old dirty men.. different..

 

[RadioactiveCPU]

lol MrCide

 

[emonkey]

<< Pics pIcs!!!!! >>



what a sick request, considering theyre underage and youve been watching them since they were babies.

Anyway, i doubt theyd do anything like playboy or whatever. Theyre way beyond millionaires already and they have enough exposure that they dont need to do that. Videogames, Clothing, endless videos, books... theyre doing just fine.

BTW: I cant stand them. Kiddie stars should just do their thing when theyre babies and read those lines then disappear. Theres something disturbing about watching a baby grow on TV then hear people start getting off on them.

 

[gygheyzeus]

aren't they like 15 years old now? i coulda swore i was only 2-3 years older than them.

 

[wajih]

hmm.....very interesting thought....i'm only 19 so it's not too much of a stretch....

it's b/c these damn young girls dress like older girls...try going to the movie theater on firday night around 7pm and you'll see what i mean...

 

[UnixFreak]

<< Anyway, i doubt theyd do anything like playboy or whatever. Theyre way beyond millionaires already and they have enough exposure that they dont need to do that. Videogames, Clothing, endless videos, books... theyre doing just fine.

BTW: I cant stand them. Kiddie stars should just do their thing when theyre babies and read those lines then disappear. Theres something disturbing about watching a baby grow on TV then hear people start getting off on them. >>



I agree. They have the disney media machine behind them, they wont be posing anywhere. I for one, would not look at that. When I think of them, I think of the smiling little kids they were on full house....Creeps me out.

 

[SJ]

I dont think they have to worry about money running out, you know all those crappy movies they made for little kids. Well they have several hundred million to their names, not their parents names.

 

[brxndxn]

I'd say they're hot..

 

[FelixDeCat]

Is anyone else waiting for like 8-10 years for the Olsen twins to be like 18 or 19 so they will like pose for Playboy or do porn or something?

thats sick. ive see this brought up before and some people arent actually waiting for 8-10 years.

 

[SSP]

<< Eh Elizabeth Berkley? Eh she's alright. I'd rather see Estella Warren from planet of the apes spreading eagle over my face, personally.(the chick wit hteh blonde hair, not the female ape chick, she's kinda ugly) >>



She already posed topless.

 

[yakko]

<< eh, they're ok, but what I'm holding out for are the 5 year old triplets I just saw. oh boy, do they have potential!

serious though-there are plenty of good looking people out there-why you feel the need to obsess over a couple of 14 (15, whatever) year olds is beyond me.

now, if they were 17, going to be 18 real soon, i could see this having a bit of merit >>

I think it has more to do with the fact that most of us have known who they were before they knew who they were. They were just a couple of infants when they first came on tv and now we are just waiting to see the full circle of life.

 

[XMan]

As Kid Rock said (regarding this topic) on SNL, &quot;If there's grass on the field, play ball!&quot;

 

[PRimate13]

They're only about 10 months younger than me
I remember watching Full House as a kid (maybe 8-9) and thinking, &quot;For my age they sure do look young.&quot;
It's ok for me to leer.

 

[mrCide]

play... ...balls? <cough>

 

[GagBag]

as the saying goes.......

If theres grass on the field, play ball!

 

[MrBond]

<< Theyre way beyond millionaires already >>

I have two words for you. Gary Coleman.

I guarantee if Gary Coleman could make a ton of money, he'd pose nude.

Oh...my...God....must....not...think....about....that....

MrBond imagines Rebecca Romjin Stamos from the 1999 SI Swimsuit issue in the painted on blue and green flower print bathing suit and all is well

 

[GagBag]

rebbeca romijn stamos actually got naked (full frontal) in the shooting of the movie rollerball. But i read an article that they tottaly hacked the movie up, removing all violence and nudity to make a pg-13 rating. too bad....

 

[jhu]

They're headcases waiting to happen

that's for sure

 

[piku]

<< Anyway, i doubt theyd do anything like playboy or whatever. Theyre way beyond millionaires already and they have enough exposure that they dont need to do that. Videogames, Clothing, endless videos, books... theyre doing just fine. >>


Just how longer do you think that will last? Their entire income comes from doing things that appeal to the little kids - and with them coming up on 18 they aren't exactly kids anymore. They aren't ever going to be able to make a living off of teen stuff (because everyone still thinks of them as kiddies) so they dont have much profitability left. Lets hope they saved some of those millions