BonzaiDuck
Lifer
- Jun 30, 2004
- 15,879
- 1,548
- 126
Barring any "application of standards," bashing Obama or some nutty things quoted from some evangelist pulpit, I'm more intrigued with what went on in the shooter's mind.
He was well-prepared. He was deliberate. He did not choose "which movie, which theater" at random, or -- to do so would be inconsistent with the body armor, weapons, gas cannisters and so on.
So maybe his dreams for being a Healer were set back or dashed?
Here, we might be interested in sorting out his actual political inclinations. Maybe they'll find something on his hard drives and internet caches.
Point being: there was one other news item from last week focusing on this "Dark Knight Rises" movie, comment observing that the name of the movie's villain had been created decades ago. The news involved screwy speculations broadcast by someone else who had flunked everything in college.
We've already been around this type of event in a single complete cycle from Tucson, AZ, January, 2011. Jared Loughner was certifiably nuts and qualified for medication, while speculation in the media focused on the speech of a failed Vice-Presidential candidate, who proceeded to back-peddle for three months thereafter -- both denying that she had anything at all to do with it, while demonstrating that she worried people thought she did.
Smells like . . . . Limburger? Nah, but a big cheese, nevertheless . . .
Sure . . . . the movie was a plot by Hollywood Dems to demonize Bain Capital. Except that the assertion is utter nonsense.
A person can be rabid with a microphone, or rabid with body armor. It's the season of "Crazy."
He was well-prepared. He was deliberate. He did not choose "which movie, which theater" at random, or -- to do so would be inconsistent with the body armor, weapons, gas cannisters and so on.
So maybe his dreams for being a Healer were set back or dashed?
Here, we might be interested in sorting out his actual political inclinations. Maybe they'll find something on his hard drives and internet caches.
Point being: there was one other news item from last week focusing on this "Dark Knight Rises" movie, comment observing that the name of the movie's villain had been created decades ago. The news involved screwy speculations broadcast by someone else who had flunked everything in college.
We've already been around this type of event in a single complete cycle from Tucson, AZ, January, 2011. Jared Loughner was certifiably nuts and qualified for medication, while speculation in the media focused on the speech of a failed Vice-Presidential candidate, who proceeded to back-peddle for three months thereafter -- both denying that she had anything at all to do with it, while demonstrating that she worried people thought she did.
Smells like . . . . Limburger? Nah, but a big cheese, nevertheless . . .
Sure . . . . the movie was a plot by Hollywood Dems to demonize Bain Capital. Except that the assertion is utter nonsense.
A person can be rabid with a microphone, or rabid with body armor. It's the season of "Crazy."