Massive Fps Drops

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Jul 12, 2013
144
0
71
I really appreciate all the help you've given. Thank you all very much.

I don't mind learning, that was actually my main reason for joining this forum; thank you all for being patient.

My only problem is that Gpu-Z says I have GDR5 memory; is this an issue?
If I don't upgrade, will my GDR5 work in a DDR3 Am3+ mobo?

Also what kind of memory fits the budget and still effectively runs games?


I would also like to know if you have any suggestions on a mobo?

Does the Intel have GDR5 support?
 

BigChickenJim

Senior member
Jul 1, 2013
239
0
0
Does the Intel have GDR5 support?

GDDR5 is the type of VRAM memory built into your GPU. DDR3 system memory is entirely unrelated. Yes, a DDR3 mobo with DDR3 RAM sticks installed will work fine with a GDDR5 GPU.

What kind/how much RAM do you currently have installed? You should be able to simply transplant it onto the new board, but we need to check that before you pull the trigger.

Also, if you plan to upgrade your mobo/CPU you'll want to make sure that an aftermarket cooler will fit in your rig and that the case header won't cause any wiring issues with the new board (this is often the case with mass-market, proprietary desktops). What kind of case do you have? If it's a mass-market desktop, what's the model number? Apologies if you've already provided this info., I'm at work and can't sift back through the thread right now.

To aid your search and avoid issues, you need to look for micro-atx AM3+ motherboards. I'll try to find a couple for you to check out.

Here are some suggestions:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813128504

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813157309

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813131795

NOTE: DO NOT PURCHASE ANY OF THESE UNTIL WE'VE MADE SURE THAT THEY WILL FIT YOUR PARTICULAR SITUATION.
 
Last edited:
Jul 12, 2013
144
0
71
GDDR5 is the type of VRAM memory built into your GPU. DDR3 system memory is entirely unrelated. Yes, a DDR3 mobo with DDR3 RAM sticks installed will work fine with a GDDR5 GPU.

What kind/how much RAM do you currently have installed? You should be able to simply transplant it onto the new board, but we need to check that before you pull the trigger.

Also, if you plan to upgrade your mobo/CPU you'll want to make sure that an aftermarket cooler will fit in your rig and that the case header won't cause any wiring issues with the new board (this is often the case with mass-market, proprietary desktops). What kind of case do you have? If it's a mass-market desktop, what's the model number? Apologies if you've already provided this info., I'm at work and can't sift back through the thread right now.

To aid your search and avoid issues, you need to look for micro-atx AM3+ motherboards. I'll try to find a couple for you to check out.

Here are some suggestions:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813128504

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813157309

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813131795

NOTE: DO NOT PURCHASE ANY OF THESE UNTIL WE'VE MADE SURE THAT THEY WILL FIT YOUR PARTICULAR SITUATION.



Thank you once again for your help, you have no idea how glad and thankful I am that you and everyone else are helping; I feel like I wont mess this up and I don't have to bug my Uncle to get answers ha ha.

As far as the memory goes, I believe its DDR2.
I didn't know that those were separate memory sectors; thank you.







I am unsure where I would go to check the model number; would that be Dell Inspiron 546 (used to be 546 MT) ?

Sorry, I am not very hardware savvy, but I am willing to learn.
 

BigChickenJim

Senior member
Jul 1, 2013
239
0
0
Ok, I've done some research for you and I unfortunately have some bad news for you. With all the variables in play and given that your system is going to be used for gaming, I don't think you're going to be able to upgrade. You're going to need to start over. Let me walk you through why I came to that conclusion.

First of all, your motherboard is not a true micro-atx board; it looks like it has slightly offset mounting screws. This is relatively common among OEM, mass-market boards because the system builder--Dell in this that case--assumes that the machine will be sold as a unit and simply replaced rather than upgraded. What that means for you is that a new motherboard likely will not fit properly in your case. You could try it, but I wouldn't.

Additionally, a new motherboard may or may not work with the front-end harness pinouts. Basically, you may not be able to properly connect the tower's buttons to the motherboard. Even worse, that case has terrible ventilation and appears to be far too small to accommodate anything other than a stock CPU cooler. Bad airflow + small case + stock CPU cooler + modern games on high settings = a recipe for catastrophic hardware failure. It isn't worth the risk. Even if you could get it working, you're going to need to buy a new OS disc since I assume your comp came preloaded with Windows. Changing the motherboard usually requires a fresh license if you don't have an install disc.

Next, you're going to need to upgrade your RAM to at least 6 gigs of DDR3 if you want reasonable gaming performance. Right now it looks like you have 2 GB DDR2. That won't work in a gaming rig.

Finally, that model of Inspiron is listed as having a Radeon HD 4350 with 512 MB of VRAM. That's woefully underpowered for today's games. You're going to need at least an HD 6xxx series with 1-2 GB of VRAM if you want to be able to play next-gen games--or even some current games.

As you can see, you're going to need a new case, motherboard, CPU, GPU, and some faster RAM if you want to game at any reasonable level. Knowing what I know now, I'm not even sure you have a CPU bottleneck--I think you may have a whole system problem.

I apologize for getting your hopes up; I tried my best to help you with a cheaper upgrade path. Sadly, the time for a total overhaul comes for nearly all of us. I wish there was a better way given your budget, but you're going to be best served by making due with what you have and saving for an entirely new rig.

I can help you put together a build plan if you'd like, but it's going to be around $500-800 to solve all your issues. Sorry, buddy.
 
Last edited:
Jul 12, 2013
144
0
71
Ok, I've done some research for you and I unfortunately have some bad news for you. With all the variables in play and given that your system is going to be used for gaming, I don't think you're going to be able to upgrade. You're going to need to start over. Let me walk you through why I came to that conclusion.

First of all, your motherboard is not a true micro-atx board; it looks like it has slightly offset mounting screws. This is relatively common among OEM, mass-market boards because the system builder--Dell in this that case--assumes that the machine will be sold as a unit and simply replaced rather than upgraded. What that means for you is that a new motherboard likely will not fit properly in your case. You could try it, but I wouldn't.

Additionally, a new motherboard may or may not work with the front-end harness pinouts. Basically, you may not be able to properly connect the tower's buttons to the motherboard. Even worse, that case has terrible ventilation and appears to be far too small to accommodate anything other than a stock CPU cooler. Bad airflow + small case + stock CPU cooler + modern games on high settings = a recipe for catastrophic hardware failure. It isn't worth the risk. Even if you could get it working, you're going to need to buy a new OS disc since I assume your comp came preloaded with Windows. Changing the motherboard usually requires a fresh license if you don't have an install disc.

Next, you're going to need to upgrade your RAM to at least 6 gigs of DDR3 if you want reasonable gaming performance. Right now it looks like you have 2 GB DDR2. That won't work in a gaming rig.

Finally, that model of Inspiron is listed as having a Radeon HD 4350 with 512 MB of VRAM. That's woefully underpowered for today's games. You're going to need at least an HD 6xxx series with 1-2 GB of VRAM if you want to be able to play next-gen games--or even some current games.

As you can see, you're going to need a new case, motherboard, CPU, GPU, and some faster RAM if you want to game at any reasonable level. Knowing what I know now, I'm not even sure you have a CPU bottleneck--I think you may have a whole system problem.

I apologize for getting your hopes up; I tried my best to help you with a cheaper upgrade path. Sadly, the time for a total overhaul comes for nearly all of us. I wish there was a better way given your budget, but you're going to be best served by making due with what you have and saving for an entirely new rig.

I can help you put together a build plan if you'd like, but it's going to be around $500-800 to solve all your issues. Sorry, buddy.


Thank you and no problem you have helped tremendously.

As far as the 4350 and the 2gb of ram is concerned:

I actually upgraded to a Radeon HD 5770, but as said, it is an entry level card; so yeah I'm pretty outdated, I presume from your conclusion. I would want to play with the resolution 1920x1080, with at least medium settings; I would also require 60 fps V-sync'd or 30 fps sync'd with higher settings than an XBOX 360 to be completely happy.

I own an Xbox360 and want to blow away the comparisons.

You are correct as far as the ram goes. I will note, however, I have 4gb; Windows 7 just takes it down along with other things I assume.
Either way, as you said, I need better RAM and many other replacements.

Thank you so much for all your help and I plan on looking into some barebones kits to make it cheaper, any ideas?
 

BigChickenJim

Senior member
Jul 1, 2013
239
0
0
Ah, I see now that I forgot about your newer GPU. Sorry about that. As you said, though, you're going to need a much better card for 60 FPS at 1080P regardless, even on medium settings. If you're going to build new, you shouldn't settle for medium. Go for ultra, that way you'll be down to medium instead of very low in 2-3 years. It's much more cost effective that way. Besides, you can get a high/ultra budget rig rolling for well under a grand.

As for the RAM, you must have an upgraded model of that Inspiron; everything I saw said 2 GB. However, you're going to need to upgrade to 6-8 GB DDR3 no matter what.

I can definitely help you put together a budget rig *rubs hands together eagerly*. Just tell me what price we're shooting for and we'll get rolling. We'll need to do that via PM or the General Hardware forums, though, because this forum is reserved for more focused discussions.
 
Jul 12, 2013
144
0
71
Ah, I see now that I forgot about your newer GPU. Sorry about that. As you said, though, you're going to need a much better card for 60 FPS at 1080P regardless, even on medium settings. If you're going to build new, you shouldn't settle for medium. Go for ultra, that way you'll be down to medium instead of very low in 2-3 years. It's much more cost effective that way. Besides, you can get a high/ultra budget rig rolling for well under a grand.

As for the RAM, you must have an upgraded model of that Inspiron; everything I saw said 2 GB. However, you're going to need to upgrade to 6-8 GB DDR3 no matter what.

I can definitely help you put together a budget rig *rubs hands together eagerly*. Just tell me what price we're shooting for and we'll get rolling. We'll need to do that via PM or the General Hardware forums, though, because this forum is reserved for more focused discussions.


It's totally okay your forgot, I have a horrible memory ha ha.

Thank you for this suggestion, chances are I will try for around 300-500$, although the 300$ seems less likely due to what I have seen lately.

Yeah, I bought it used so I am not sure who upgraded it, but I am assuming you are correct.

I do have a question though: Are all motherboards made for one specific type of memory; as in, can I upgrade my ram to DDR3?

If you can please tell me how to PM, I would love to have some more help with this; I seemed to mess up this forum when I started and don't want to repeat the mistakes ha ha.

You along with other have been extremely helpful; thank you so much.
 

BigChickenJim

Senior member
Jul 1, 2013
239
0
0
Just click on my avatar and select "send message" or whatever that option is in the drop-down menu (on my phone now, so it's a little different).

Some motherboards are both DDR2 and DDR3 compliant, but they're relatively rare and I'm guessing yours isn't one of them.

$500 seems doable, actually. Let me work on it. Out of curiosity, what kind of HDD do you have? We may be able to salvage it.
 

futurefields

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2012
6,470
32
91
I mean better in comparison to the Xbox360-just to clarify.

The 5770 is for sure a more powerful GPU than what is in the Xbox 360. But the Xbox 360 targets 1280 x 720 native resolution, some games are even lower than that. Call of duty renders at only 1024 x 600! That is a huge reduction in pixels likely from what your PC is running. That is how the 360 gets away with using so many shader effects etc... the fillrate demand is very low.

What resolution is your monitor? The 5770 will struggle at 1080p on modern games. You would actually probably have a better gaming experience if you hooked your computer up to a 720p TV and played from 5-7 feet away, as if it were a console. Of course this isnt always ideal for all games. But for some games (ie. console ports) it is a great solution and frees up the GPU to increase detail settings. The 5770 can do 720p in it's sleep. It has a decent amount of shader power but is really limited by 16 ROP's. You really want a 32 ROP card to drive 1080p.

And lastly, your CPU is heavily bottlenecking you at this point. Games used to not use much CPU back in the day when you bought that processor, but now games are using a lot more physics, which are usually heavily triggered by explosions. That would explain the drop in FPS in physics heavy games you are experiencing. Athlon X2 is really underpowered for modern games. Not sure what other CPU's that motherboard is compatible with. Could you get a quad core Phenom in there? That would help a lot.
 

BigChickenJim

Senior member
Jul 1, 2013
239
0
0
I did a preliminary shop for you tonight. I think $500 is going to be a stretch since you're going to need at least an HD 7870 to really "blow away" the consoles (or at least get on the same level as the new consoles), but right around the $650 mark is definitely doable if you can salvage your current HDD and stick to AMD chips. When you start to fall below the performance marks you want (around 1.5-2 years from now with a 7870), you can simply buy another 7870 and/or overclock your CPU and be right back in the game.

A word of warning about a first build: you're going to have people trying to convince you to buy $300 processors and $250 motherboards, $300 cases the size of small apartments, and $500+ video cards capable of producing 473 million frames per second. That's where personal choice comes in. If you've got the money and are willing to spend it on a dream machine, I say go for it. However, my philosophy has always been to never spend more than I have to in order to get the performance I want even though I've got the dough. Miserly? A little, but I have more important financial priorities than my computer. That, and I take pride in the fact that my "budget" rigs can keep up with machines that cost twice as much or more in nearly every game out there.

You're also going to run across people who forget important pieces of information like I did with your GPU and others who are simply wrong. Take suggestions (yes, mine too--I'm just a hobby builder after all) with a grain of salt and don't let people bludgeon you to death with 50 million benchmarks or meaningless technical trivia that amounts to nothing in the real world. Pick the components you want, do your homework, and STICK TO YOUR BUDGET. These projects have a habit of getting out of control monetarily if you let them.

Good luck, and feel free to PM me if you need help. I love vicarious building.
 
Last edited:

flexy

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2001
8,464
155
106
Hello,

I am having issues with almost every video game I play. It seems that I drop 10-20 fps during heavy explosions and also during specific loading areas.

Some games, for example Diablo 3 are NOTORIOUSLY bad for lagging caused from disk access. Eg explosions, loading of new areas or textures == lag and stutter. It might not be an issue having to do with your GPU at all.

Eg. Diablo 3 and some games benefit greatly if you put them on a SSD.
 

BigChickenJim

Senior member
Jul 1, 2013
239
0
0
Some games, for example Diablo 3 are NOTORIOUSLY bad for lagging caused from disk access. Eg explosions, loading of new areas or textures == lag and stutter. It might not be an issue having to do with your GPU at all.

Eg. Diablo 3 and some games benefit greatly if you put them on a SSD.

His issues are being caused by a multitude of shortcomings in his machine, unfortunately. No single upgrade is going to fix his problems. It's just time for a new rig.
 
Jul 12, 2013
144
0
71
Just click on my avatar and select "send message" or whatever that option is in the drop-down menu (on my phone now, so it's a little different).

Some motherboards are both DDR2 and DDR3 compliant, but they're relatively rare and I'm guessing yours isn't one of them.

$500 seems doable, actually. Let me work on it. Out of curiosity, what kind of HDD do you have? We may be able to salvage it.


I just seen this...hmm perhaps delayed? I don't know, at this point it could be me ha ha.

I also doubt my system will take DDR3.

I will do some research on what my HDD is and let you know; I would like to keep some of this discussion open though for ideas, perhaps someone else has a few ideas that can help temporarily.

In the meantime, I do believe it's time for a new rig.

Thank you all for your patience, and thank you very much BigChickenJim; you have been a great help.
 
Jul 12, 2013
144
0
71
Some games, for example Diablo 3 are NOTORIOUSLY bad for lagging caused from disk access. Eg explosions, loading of new areas or textures == lag and stutter. It might not be an issue having to do with your GPU at all.

Eg. Diablo 3 and some games benefit greatly if you put them on a SSD.


Hello thank you for this information and thank you all for your patience.

I have read a lot that has said that specific games and ported games seem to have massive issues like this; I do wonder however if it isn't a system issue in general.

A lot of the issues I have seen have been solved by an upgrade, I have just dreaded the concept on such a low budget.

My computer is highly outdated, in my opinion, so I don't find it hard to believe it is a PC issue; I will say though, that I along with every human being, knows only so much so I won't say one way or the other, I just appreciate all the help.

I have tried multiple solutions on many games, solving various issues, but it still isn't enough; games like DarkSiders, Prototype, and Saints Row 3 all have massive stopping and lag issues. I am assuming this is due to my non DDR3 memory, My outdated Dell stocked, and a possibly bad power supply.

I would like to know how to fix some of those game issues if you have any ideas; my first post, I believe, states a lot of the methods I had tried that fixed countless games. I am willing to share my ideas also, as this is what I have quite a bit of experience in.

I would like to say though that I have seen High End PCs run most of these games perfect in a YouTube video or another; this along with the fact that
I can lower settings and nothing changes, leads me to believe that I have a bottleneck Issue or as BigChickenJim said, a " You're going to need to start over."

Thank you again for you help and if you have any ideas on how to drop these problems, please let me know.
 

John Dime

Member
May 6, 2013
71
0
0
A bundle of relevant information here, thanks to many, but specifically BigChickenJim.

Given that you're looking for other opinions, I decided to chip in.

You are running a 32 bit version of Windows 7, which means that you would need to acquire a 64 bit version in order to validate adding more RAM, given that the former version only addresses up to 4 GB. Because the GPU's VideoRAM and other devices' Input/Output are memory-mapped into system RAM, bearing in mind you have a GPU with 1 GB of VRAM, you end up with barely over 2 GB of usable RAM. This is somewhat problematic as far as recent games go, although the recommended settings for the ones you brought up, appear to be around the aforementioned amount.

Nevertheless, this likely is one of your issues (run Task Manager on the background while playing any of the games for a couple of minutes and then check the graph to determine the amount of available memory in the meantime and diagnose this as a limitation or not) and as pointed out, not only would you need to add extra RAM, DDR2 no less, which happens to be more expensive and slower than DDR3, you would also be required to install the 64 bit version of the OS, for it to take advantage of the extra physical memory and allow the 32 bit games to make full use of the up to 2 GB they're entitled to. If this proves to be one of the issues, which frankly, it will ultimately come to be as you approach more recent gaming titles.

Moving on to the GPU - the resolution you're aiming at may demand more than what it can deliver. Again, the games you bring up aren't particularly exigent, but later on the road you will likely notice the absence of rendering power. Utilizing a similar method to that described above with Task Manager, you can leave GPU-Z running on the background whilst you game for a couple of minutes and eventually browse the data on the Sensors tab, in order to acquaint yourself with the usage percentage of the GPU. Additionally, if you tick the Log to File option, GPU-Z will write down the information for you, for posterior analysis. Make sure you un-tick the option once you're done recording, not to end up with an immense and unneeded log file.

Where the CPU is concerned - this bears yet again the mention of the fact that those games aren't Quad-Core demanding, but it certainly wouldn't hurt to have the extra machinery - you're running a somewhat obsolete gaming CPU. Again, Task Manager to the rescue and to provide some information, regarding CPU usage.

So far, I've attempted to provide easy diagnostic methods, for you to acquaint yourself with the response of your hardware to the software demands. Discarding for a moment the upgrading venue, you would want to attempt over-clocking the CPU and GPU - depending on what's being strained the most. CPU wise however, given that we're talking about an OEM board, you likely won't be able to follow this route, which only leaves GPU over-clocking. From what I can tell, this won't solve your issues, but let's explore that option for a minute and hopefully you can report back with relevant information that will allow us to definitively deem your whole system as obsolete and from there on, I'm sure BigChickenJim will be happy to help you with both of his *rubbing hands*.

I would generate a few, 3 or 4 results per each game you're having issues with, to determine whether over-clocking the GPU is a relevant course. If you come to the conclusion, after analysing the GPU-Z generated logs, that its usage is constantly above 90-95%, then over-clocking will help.

Firstly, however, I suggest you download AMD's clean-up utility, run it, reboot and proceed to install the the latest stable release of Catalyst Software Suite (13.4 as of today), which you can download from here. Do not install Catalyst Control Center - un-tick it during the installation and instead, download MSI Afterburner and set it up so it starts with Windows, as it's much lighter on resources and will likely suffice your needs. All this procedure should hopefully prove a solution to any driver issues.

From there on, if you happen to identify the GPU as the culprit, you should be able to tweak its clocks via MSI Afterburner, using the sliders - they should be set to 850/1200 by default. For guidance on HD 5770 over-clocking values, consult posts around the web, or if it comes to that, I'll provide you with some.

I wouldn't get my hopes high, not unless this issue suddenly began occurring on previously smoothly-running games, which you weren't clear about, in which case software could be the culprit, best case scenario. Given that you would indeed need a complete system upgrade, do explore every possible course until you've definitely ruled out every non-upgrade related fix.

JD
 
Jul 12, 2013
144
0
71
The 5770 is for sure a more powerful GPU than what is in the Xbox 360. But the Xbox 360 targets 1280 x 720 native resolution, some games are even lower than that. Call of duty renders at only 1024 x 600! That is a huge reduction in pixels likely from what your PC is running. That is how the 360 gets away with using so many shader effects etc... the fillrate demand is very low.

What resolution is your monitor? The 5770 will struggle at 1080p on modern games. You would actually probably have a better gaming experience if you hooked your computer up to a 720p TV and played from 5-7 feet away, as if it were a console. Of course this isnt always ideal for all games. But for some games (ie. console ports) it is a great solution and frees up the GPU to increase detail settings. The 5770 can do 720p in it's sleep. It has a decent amount of shader power but is really limited by 16 ROP's. You really want a 32 ROP card to drive 1080p.

And lastly, your CPU is heavily bottlenecking you at this point. Games used to not use much CPU back in the day when you bought that processor, but now games are using a lot more physics, which are usually heavily triggered by explosions. That would explain the drop in FPS in physics heavy games you are experiencing. Athlon X2 is really underpowered for modern games. Not sure what other CPU's that motherboard is compatible with. Could you get a quad core Phenom in there? That would help a lot.


Thank you for your added information; I believe this post will help a lot of people.

Although I was aware that most games were in 720p, I never considered 600 as a resolution, whether I've seen it or not; that's very strange to me.

I could see how they get away with the settings they use, mostly the colors seems off to me, Xbox360 being the more realistic coloring.

BigChickenJim quoted "For the record, most console games these days run at the equivalent of medium-low settings."
Do you know where I could go to find this information?; comparisons and such?

My monitor is 1920x1080 Dell 24" 16:9. 720p is a decent setting, its just the games I really have problems with, that setting don't matter. Which leads me to the next subject: Bottlenecking. (Thank you for introducing me to ROPs, I will look into this.)

I agree it is a bottleneck issue and have looked at the Phenom x4 955: at this point that may just be my temp fix, BigChickenJim suggested some cooling units for some processors, any added ideas?
I will note that my case is very small.

The information you provided has answered my question about CPU controlling physics; I had assumed this but had no hard evidence to back the theory.

Thank you very much, I will try to respond to everyone as quickly as possible, Thank you for you patience.
 
Jul 12, 2013
144
0
71
I did a preliminary shop for you tonight. I think $500 is going to be a stretch since you're going to need at least an HD 7870 to really "blow away" the consoles (or at least get on the same level as the new consoles), but right around the $650 mark is definitely doable if you can salvage your current HDD and stick to AMD chips. When you start to fall below the performance marks you want (around 1.5-2 years from now with a 7870), you can simply buy another 7870 and/or overclock your CPU and be right back in the game.

A word of warning about a first build: you're going to have people trying to convince you to buy $300 processors and $250 motherboards, $300 cases the size of small apartments, and $500+ video cards capable of producing 473 million frames per second. That's where personal choice comes in. If you've got the money and are willing to spend it on a dream machine, I say go for it. However, my philosophy has always been to never spend more than I have to in order to get the performance I want even though I've got the dough. Miserly? A little, but I have more important financial priorities than my computer. That, and I take pride in the fact that my "budget" rigs can keep up with machines that cost twice as much or more in nearly every game out there.

You're also going to run across people who forget important pieces of information like I did with your GPU and others who are simply wrong. Take suggestions (yes, mine too--I'm just a hobby builder after all) with a grain of salt and don't let people bludgeon you to death with 50 million benchmarks or meaningless technical trivia that amounts to nothing in the real world. Pick the components you want, do your homework, and STICK TO YOUR BUDGET. These projects have a habit of getting out of control monetarily if you let them.

Good luck, and feel free to PM me if you need help. I love vicarious building.


Thank you very much for doing all this research, you've been a great help.
650$ actually sounds somewhat doable, I'm still unsure what my HDD model is, any ideas on how I figure this out; it's okay if not I will figure it out shortly.

I must say sir, that was hilarious, the whole budget part and I agree, cheap and effective wins any day.

I will definitely be careful and I am sure I will be contacting you as soon as I have the money to upgrade, if not sooner for temp fixes; assuming you don't mind.

Thanks again, I highly appreciate it, and thank you all; I will respond as soon as possible.
 

BigChickenJim

Senior member
Jul 1, 2013
239
0
0
John Dime makes an excellent point about you needing a 64 bit operating system to get the most out of a RAM upgrade. I've been running a 64 bit OS for so long I'd forgotten about that stuff.

Buying temporary upgrades will only make your saving take longer. The term "bandaid on a shotgun wound" comes to mind. You could take JDs advice and overclock your components; at least that wouldn't cost any money. However, as he said, if you choose to do this be very careful. I know I said not to fear overclocking, but knowing what I now know about your current rig I would be very leery of pushing those components past stock. Definitely don't touch the CPU settings--you're liable to blow the board with even a small voltage bump and any benefits from a small stock-volt OC are going to be outweighed by the heat issues it could cause in your current case. A GPU OC is safer, but given that lowering game settings has no positive effect I'd again say the risk and heat outweigh the potential benefits.

If you're willing to possibly write off that whole rig I say knock yourself out and OC that sucker 'til she catches fire. However, given what I know about your circumstances I'm guessing that your comp isn't solely dedicated to gaming and that you'd like to keep it if possible.

As for the HDD, I believe you should be able to view it either Windows device manager or HWinfo. All I really care about is the speed; you'll need at least a 7200 RPM drive to avoid bottlenecking a newer system. Never fear, even if you have to get a new one they are dirt cheap.

No, I don't mind if you contact me with your questions. Hell, I'm only on these forums because I love talking to fellow geeks. My real-life interactions at work tend to be (necessarily) serious and boring. Geekdom is my outlet, so really you're helping me out by allowing me geek it up.
 
Last edited:
Jul 12, 2013
144
0
71
A bundle of relevant information here, thanks to many, but specifically BigChickenJim.

Given that you're looking for other opinions, I decided to chip in.

You are running a 32 bit version of Windows 7, which means that you would need to acquire a 64 bit version in order to validate adding more RAM, given that the former version only addresses up to 4 GB. Because the GPU's VideoRAM and other devices' Input/Output are memory-mapped into system RAM, bearing in mind you have a GPU with 1 GB of VRAM, you end up with barely over 2 GB of usable RAM. This is somewhat problematic as far as recent games go, although the recommended settings for the ones you brought up, appear to be around the aforementioned amount.

Nevertheless, this likely is one of your issues (run Task Manager on the background while playing any of the games for a couple of minutes and then check the graph to determine the amount of available memory in the meantime and diagnose this as a limitation or not) and as pointed out, not only would you need to add extra RAM, DDR2 no less, which happens to be more expensive and slower than DDR3, you would also be required to install the 64 bit version of the OS, for it to take advantage of the extra physical memory and allow the 32 bit games to make full use of the up to 2 GB they're entitled to. If this proves to be one of the issues, which frankly, it will ultimately come to be as you approach more recent gaming titles.

Moving on to the GPU - the resolution you're aiming at may demand more than what it can deliver. Again, the games you bring up aren't particularly exigent, but later on the road you will likely notice the absence of rendering power. Utilizing a similar method to that described above with Task Manager, you can leave GPU-Z running on the background whilst you game for a couple of minutes and eventually browse the data on the Sensors tab, in order to acquaint yourself with the usage percentage of the GPU. Additionally, if you tick the Log to File option, GPU-Z will write down the information for you, for posterior analysis. Make sure you un-tick the option once you're done recording, not to end up with an immense and unneeded log file.

Where the CPU is concerned - this bears yet again the mention of the fact that those games aren't Quad-Core demanding, but it certainly wouldn't hurt to have the extra machinery - you're running a somewhat obsolete gaming CPU. Again, Task Manager to the rescue and to provide some information, regarding CPU usage.

So far, I've attempted to provide easy diagnostic methods, for you to acquaint yourself with the response of your hardware to the software demands. Discarding for a moment the upgrading venue, you would want to attempt over-clocking the CPU and GPU - depending on what's being strained the most. CPU wise however, given that we're talking about an OEM board, you likely won't be able to follow this route, which only leaves GPU over-clocking. From what I can tell, this won't solve your issues, but let's explore that option for a minute and hopefully you can report back with relevant information that will allow us to definitively deem your whole system as obsolete and from there on, I'm sure BigChickenJim will be happy to help you with both of his *rubbing hands*.

I would generate a few, 3 or 4 results per each game you're having issues with, to determine whether over-clocking the GPU is a relevant course. If you come to the conclusion, after analysing the GPU-Z generated logs, that its usage is constantly above 90-95%, then over-clocking will help.

Firstly, however, I suggest you download AMD's clean-up utility, run it, reboot and proceed to install the the latest stable release of Catalyst Software Suite (13.4 as of today), which you can download from here. Do not install Catalyst Control Center - un-tick it during the installation and instead, download MSI Afterburner and set it up so it starts with Windows, as it's much lighter on resources and will likely suffice your needs. All this procedure should hopefully prove a solution to any driver issues.

From there on, if you happen to identify the GPU as the culprit, you should be able to tweak its clocks via MSI Afterburner, using the sliders - they should be set to 850/1200 by default. For guidance on HD 5770 over-clocking values, consult posts around the web, or if it comes to that, I'll provide you with some.

I wouldn't get my hopes high, not unless this issue suddenly began occurring on previously smoothly-running games, which you weren't clear about, in which case software could be the culprit, best case scenario. Given that you would indeed need a complete system upgrade, do explore every possible course until you've definitely ruled out every non-upgrade related fix.

JD


Thank you for your help, I appreciate this info.

Although I was aware of the 64bit issue involving memory up to 4gb(I'm prepared, not to excited about the jump, but I have a 64bit version of Windows 7 as well), I am a bit confused on what utilities are taking up my machines ram. I believe windows requires 1gb of memory, but what else is taking that ram up? I apologize if I'm misunderstanding.

"you would also be required to install the 64 bit version of the OS, for it to take advantage of the extra physical memory and allow the 32 bit games to make full use of the up to 2 GB they're entitled to."

So by this do you mean that 32bit allows less than 2gb of memory even with upgraded RAM?

I will try to run these tests and I will let you know what happens; thank you for you help.

As far as using Gpu-Z, what do you recommend I look for?

I'm still unsure if I can upgrade to the Phenom II x4 955, but I wouldn't mind a temp fix. I recall reading bad things about this or other OEM machines as far as upgrading is concerned; do you have any idea why these are so difficult to upgrade, assuming they actually are?

"I would generate a few, 3 or 4 results per each game you're having issues with, to determine whether over-clocking the GPU is a relevant course. If you come to the conclusion, after analysing the GPU-Z generated logs, that its usage is constantly above 90-95%, then over-clocking will help."


What do you mean by the usage being 90-95%?
Is that an average of everything in these logs and is there anything specific I should be looking for?

Thank you for this clean-up utility, I will attempt this and let you know what happens. As far as MSI Afterburner, this crashed my system at one point and I was able to restore using a Restore Point.

Any ideas on why this would have happened?

I use RadeonPro at this point which has overclocking options; if all tests show that I can overclock, I may just try it. I will definitely ask you and BigChickenJim for help; thank you very much.

Thank you all for your patience and help, It's always appreciated.
 

BigChickenJim

Senior member
Jul 1, 2013
239
0
0
1. Don't get too wrapped up in the technical side of memory mapping and CPU addressing. You're likely to confuse yourself if you do. What you need to know on a practical level is that, as I said before, you need around 8Gb of DDR3 system memory. To do that upgrade, you need both a DDR3-compliant motherboard and a 64 bit OS. The rest is just technical fluff.

If for some reason you'd like to read about the subject on a nitty-gritty technical level, this is a good place to start: http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1035670. Interesting, but ultimately unnecessary information in your case.

2. When JD says 95% usage, he means your GPU's average usage during gaming. If the usage is consistently very low, it could point to a bottleneck elsewhere. If it's consistently very high, you likely are pushing your rig as hard as it will go and will need an upgrade. I feel like we've already established that you need a new rig, but if you want to run this test you can. You're simply looking to see if your average GPU usage is high (I'd say 80% and up) or relatively low (below 80%).

MSI Afterburner's in-game overlay is the best way to monitor usage if you decide to test, but I believe GPU-Z has a logging feature that can do the same thing. As for why MSI Afterburner crashed your comp, I have no idea. By nature it is an extremely low-level-access program, which means it's very invasive and sticks its virtual tentacles out everywhere in your system. That can cause issues with antivirus software, and indeed that is the most common cause of Afterburner issues. However, your crash could have been caused by a variety of things, and without being able to access your logs it is nearly impossible to tell which was the culprit. For now, just avoid it. Honestly I think the testing is a waste; your comp is simply outdated and we already know this.

3. Do not, I repeat DO NOT overclock your CPU on that motherboard unless you are prepared to lose the whole system. You will likely fry your system and could possibly cause a fire if the board has inadequate VRM or Northbridge cooling (and I suspect it does). The GPU overclock is much safer, so if you want to try that I say go for it. Just watch your temps carefully and take it easy. Oh, and for future reference CPU overclocking is best done directly through the BIOS instead of a third-party program. The same is true of GPU overclocking, but since GPU BIOS can be a huge pain in the butt it often makes more sense to use software programs.

4. As I said before, a Phenom II x4 is the best CPU that board will take. I think it's a waste of your hard-earned cash, but if you want to buy one you should be ok provided that your temperatures in that stuffy case don't get too high. OEM boards are often difficult to upgrade on because they are frequently not standardized or user-friendly. The manufacturers don't expect you to be diving into a pre-built to upgrade, so they don't design or plan with that contingency in mind.

Hope that helps.
 
Last edited:

John Dime

Member
May 6, 2013
71
0
0
Although I was aware of the 64bit issue involving memory up to 4gb(I'm prepared, not to excited about the jump, but I have a 64bit version of Windows 7 as well), I am a bit confused on what utilities are taking up my machines ram. I believe windows requires 1gb of memory, but what else is taking that ram up? I apologize if I'm misunderstanding.

So by this do you mean that 32bit allows less than 2gb of memory even with upgraded RAM?

1 GB is the bare minimum requirement. Once you begin adding devices and buffers, such as graphics cards, to process image/video, these will populate system RAM. That's why the full 4 GB aren't available to begin with. Let's say, very simply put, that there is a certain amount of system RAM reserved which in-OS software cannot utilize. The issue with your system appears to be, based on what I can gather from inspecting one of the images on post #37 (and I don't know what you had running other than HWiNFO32), that the available RAM is indeed borderline sufficient for you to run games without this being an issue. Again, testing would be required to determine whether your system is being hindered by insufficient RAM. Task Manager on the background while running the most demanding title you have, would give you a [very] raw understanding of whether there's any RAM left or not - if you can do it, Alt+Tab works wonders here.

A small addendum: On a 32 bit OS (in Windows 7's case at least), 32 bit applications will only use up to 2 GB of RAM (3 GB with the IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE instruction set: read some more here). The 32 bit OS (again, in Windows 7's case), will only address up to 4 GB, which may fall short, as I suspect you're experiencing, on top of CPU limitations.

If you have a 64 bit version of Windows you can then have 6 GB or more of RAM, which allows for enough overhead that you likely won't have to worry about RAM limitation whilst running a 32 bit application, which most games are, even with a background application running, or two. This is why people often recommend at least 6-8 GB of RAM, for a gaming rig.

As far as using Gpu-Z, what do you recommend I look for?

If you already inspected a GPU-Z log file, you noticed that there's a GPU usage column, in percentage, updated by the second (if I recall correctly). As BigChickenJim pointed out, my mentioning of this pertains to the bottle-necking point. If a CPU manages to feed enough information to keep the GPU at a usage percentage above 90%, then it's the GPU the limiting factor and you're fine, CPU wise. I don't reckon this is the case with your system, but it wouldn't hurt to confirm, given that it would only require you to log the activity and read the file afterwards. On the other hand, if the GPU usage is often below, say 80%, as suggested by BigChickenJim, then the CPU cannot process information fast enough to keep the GPU completely busy and there's your limitation/bottle-neck.

I'm still unsure if I can upgrade to the Phenom II x4 955, but I wouldn't mind a temp fix. I recall reading bad things about this or other OEM machines as far as upgrading is concerned; do you have any idea why these are so difficult to upgrade, assuming they actually are?

Those systems are conceived to be replaced/disposed of, rather than upgraded, once they begin lacking horsepower. That's how the OEM market thrives. Be it motherboard screw-holes, CPU cooler height or GPU length, you will eventually encounter a compatibility issue that will deem a vital component unfit. Then it's new case time, motivated by the acquisition of the new vital component, so why not upgrade something else?

To address the Phenom II X4 955 specifically, according to this, you can fit the 840 model on that motherboard, which is confirmed to be compatible on the very last post here. The problem is the TDP difference - while the 840 is rated at 95W (already 30W more than your X2 240), the 955 is rated at 125W and as BigChickenJim has been duly pointing out, this could complicate the matter, where cooling is concerned, if the motherboard supports such a power hungry CPU, to begin with. Therefore, if socket compatibility doesn't happen to be an issue, I would still not consider this upgrade path, not unless you can guarantee a proper cooling solution. To sum it up - if you plan on maintaining the same motherboard and RAM, the 840 is an option, the 955 shouldn't be. If you install the 64 bit version of Windows 7, acquire the 840 and install another 2 GB of RAM, it could relieve your system in the meantime, but it's an incremental upgrade that I personally wouldn't adopt. There isn't enough power there to smoothly run the most recent games at 1080p, let alone the upcoming.

A bit of good news now (potentially) - according to the last post here, and take it for what it is, someone's opinion and something of which they aren't completely sure, that user indicates the motherboard in question may be a standard Micro ATX board, which would allow you to replace only the motherboard, the CPU and the RAM, for now. If you follow the i5-3570K route, as suggested here and endorsed by myself, who happens to own one, you can get away with buying a Micro ATX board, the CPU and 8 GB of RAM for what, $350-400? I'm not big on US prices, living in Europe and all, but that rough estimate sounds accurate enough - BigChickenJim to the rescue here!

PS.: Regarding MSI Afterburner and the crashing, I too don't know what triggered that, not unless you got to tweak the GPU clocks and dramatically altered those, which doesn't look to be the case. Anyway, your software of choice, RadeonPro should be able to handle the task of replacing CCC, which is far more resource-hungry and the primary reason I deterred you from resorting to it in the first place.

JD
 
Jul 12, 2013
144
0
71
1. Don't get too wrapped up in the technical side of memory mapping and CPU addressing. You're likely to confuse yourself if you do. What you need to know on a practical level is that, as I said before, you need around 8Gb of DDR3 system memory. To do that upgrade, you need both a DDR3-compliant motherboard and a 64 bit OS. The rest is just technical fluff.

If for some reason you'd like to read about the subject on a nitty-gritty technical level, this is a good place to start: http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1035670. Interesting, but ultimately unnecessary information in your case.

2. When JD says 95% usage, he means your GPU's average usage during gaming. If the usage is consistently very low, it could point to a bottleneck elsewhere. If it's consistently very high, you likely are pushing your rig as hard as it will go and will need an upgrade. I feel like we've already established that you need a new rig, but if you want to run this test you can. You're simply looking to see if your average GPU usage is high (I'd say 80% and up) or relatively low (below 80%).

MSI Afterburner's in-game overlay is the best way to monitor usage if you decide to test, but I believe GPU-Z has a logging feature that can do the same thing. As for why MSI Afterburner crashed your comp, I have no idea. By nature it is an extremely low-level-access program, which means it's very invasive and sticks its virtual tentacles out everywhere in your system. That can cause issues with antivirus software, and indeed that is the most common cause of Afterburner issues. However, your crash could have been caused by a variety of things, and without being able to access your logs it is nearly impossible to tell which was the culprit. For now, just avoid it. Honestly I think the testing is a waste; your comp is simply outdated and we already know this.

3. Do not, I repeat DO NOT overclock your CPU on that motherboard unless you are prepared to lose the whole system. You will likely fry your system and could possibly cause a fire if the board has inadequate VRM or Northbridge cooling (and I suspect it does). The GPU overclock is much safer, so if you want to try that I say go for it. Just watch your temps carefully and take it easy. Oh, and for future reference CPU overclocking is best done directly through the BIOS instead of a third-party program. The same is true of GPU overclocking, but since GPU BIOS can be a huge pain in the butt it often makes more sense to use software programs.

4. As I said before, a Phenom II x4 is the best CPU that board will take. I think it's a waste of your hard-earned cash, but if you want to buy one you should be ok provided that your temperatures in that stuffy case don't get too high. OEM boards are often difficult to upgrade on because they are frequently not standardized or user-friendly. The manufacturers don't expect you to be diving into a pre-built to upgrade, so they don't design or plan with that contingency in mind.

Hope that helps.


Thank you for your help, I appreciate it.
I decided to combine both posts that I haven’t been able to respond to into one post.




Yes I do believe I will upgrade to 64bit, but as I said not to happy about the change; 64bit from what I recall is riddled with problems, especially when trying to run old games. I will fix them no problem, that’s what I do, but I am not excited about it.




I appreciate you giving me some heads up on the overclocking, but as you said it could be very dangerous and I really don’t have the money to replace it; on that note I would like to say that I will be waiting until tax time for a new PC anyway at this point, so I don’t mind the 80-130$ right now as a temp fix opposed to the 650$ I will spend on my awesome new PC. I have many children and animals, to put it bluntly haha.




Although my HDD says WDC WD5000AAKS-75V0A0 ATA, this is the best I could do. Not sure if SATA and ATA are different.







[FONT=&quot]I’m glad that I have given you an outlet for your caged enthusiasm in geekage; I too enjoy geeking it up and also understand the necessity for venting through geek type interests.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]As far as getting to wrapped up in the memory subject and confusing myself goes: I actually am preparing to take a Comptia A+ certification test and will be trying for other Certs in the future, so it could only help my cause; thank you for this article I will definitely look into this and hope it breaks the confusion barrier I had reading that post.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]As far as the test goes: I do believe it’s a lot of things causing my issues and I could use and upgrade, but I would still like to make this a temp fix; I am willing to put in some work, just need the time. I am just trying to figure out what specifics I should be looking for when using these tools, I don’t recall seeing anything as simple as GPU usage percent, in a whole, in my software. How would I know if it was 80%, do you mean an average of all the sensors?[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Yeah, I have no idea why MSI Afterburner had so many issues, but I would likely blame it on my anti-virus. I believe I will stay away from it if it is unnecessary.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Also as I said, I won’t be overclocking if I don’t have the evidence that it’s completely safe and from what I recall, it is not on my OEM.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] Thank you for the info about the BIOS, to be honest I didn’t know it was possible to do it through software; everything I read suggested BIOS as you have.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]I apologize for forgetting you had said that I was able to get a Phenom II x4 955; if you don’t mind me asking, how did you come to that conclusion(How it is the best and how it is compatible). I just want to be completely safe; I’d appreciate it if you don’t take offence to that, as I mean none by it.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]I will contact you once I get the upgrade to find out if I am having heat issues; although I believe it is smarter to do the research personally, I don’t always have time to research myself and I appreciate all the help you can give me.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Thank you for clueing me in on the OEM issue; I recall reading that somewhere else also. Sucks to me, I believe everything should be upgradable, no matter how crazy that sounds.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Well again, thank you very much and thank you all for your patience, I will respond as quick as I can.[/FONT]
 

BigChickenJim

Senior member
Jul 1, 2013
239
0
0
Awesome. You're good to go with that HDD. That should save you around $70. I'll type up the information about your processor upgrade (crash course in socket types and TDP) and try to answer your other questions tomorrow. Bed time for now. Long day...
 
Last edited:

John Dime

Member
May 6, 2013
71
0
0
Regarding the GPU usage percentage I've been going on about - this pertains primarily to the core and memory clocks. The HD 5770 has its default top clocks at 850 and 1200 MHz, respectively. As you may have noticed, it idles at 157 and 300 MHz, respectively. Now, once the GPU is stressed past a certain point, much like how it happens with CPU's and their C states, the GPU will resort to another clock state in order to provide sufficient rendering power to process whatever's thrown its way, up until it reaches the highest clock state, which by default is the former (850 and 1200 MHz). I'm omitting the details on clock states to try and keep it succinct, but you can consult them here, on the BIOS Internals table.

The particular column I've been referring to, on the GPU-Z log, should read GPU Load [%] and present values within the interval 0-100. It's the percentage of load on the GPU clocks, simply put. To gain some headroom, you push those 850/1200 numbers a little further, the so called over-clocking, which will, if the GPU is constantly loaded at or above 90% of its capacity (while gaming, for instance), give you some more rendering power and provide slightly smoother gaming, hopefully. Given that you keep asking about averages: not to confuse you further, but the load percentage on the log, as well as every other value, is indeed an average, given that the log will have information added every 1 second and the values change more often than that. Otherwise, for most intents and purposes, you can consider it an instantaneous reading. I hope I've been clear, this time.

The second relevant clarification I would like to make is regarding motherboard CPU compatibility. From what I gather, the top CPU you want to use with that motherboard is indeed the Phenom II X4 840 (check this). Your current CPU has a TDP of 65 W -> X4 840 = 95 W -> X4 955 = 125 W. We're talking about nearly doubling the TDP of the processor if you opt for the X4 955, which isn't a good idea at all. Furthermore, I've read 2 or 3 topics on the matter, on the Dell forums, where people wanted to upgrade their CPU with the same motherboard, and the best it could handle was indeed the X4 840.

Frankly, if you acquire the X4 840 + 2 GB more of RAM and install the 64 bit version of Windows 7, you should be fine running most pre-2013 games on medium settings, at 1080p (rough estimate), provided that you don't come across any thermal issue, which running that CPU at stock voltages shouldn't incite. Again, this incremental upgrade isn't ideal, because it's a matter of time until your virtual endeavours require more power, but for now, given that you are willing to spend a little over $100 on a temporary solution, that should relieve your system.

A side note: the main differences between [P]ATA and SATA are a slight speed increase from the latter over the former and different connectors. You can read more on the Web, but that pretty much covers the relevant points.

JD
 
Last edited:
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |