Masturbated and recorded it on phone, accidentlly sent it to all contacts.

[SP33Demon]

I just want to be the one to let you know you're a little bit insane.

A drunk driver hitting somebody has caused permanent, obvious damage. Honestly, the average girl getting this is going to freak out and scream about how gross it is and yeah it will be shocking, but it's not like she's going to need counselling.

So you know what the effect of a video of an authority figure jerking off is to a child? BS you do. Accident or not, he has harmed a child and he needs to be punished for that. Just because the harm is not quantifiable in your pea brain doesn't mean a child wasn't harmed.

 

[werepossum]

This should be embarrassment enough.

lol

I'm about the same age and I had to give that up. I'm not touching that thing - I don't know where I've been!

 

[Engineer]

LOL @ the thread tag! :biggrin:

Social media is destroying America.....including ATOT!!!

 

[TallBill]

There's a rule, though not one that can be enforced: NEVER add current students to your accounts on social media. Had he followed the rule, he'd be embarrassed. But, since he sent the images to underaged students, he's in pretty big trouble for distributing pornography to a minor.

Same with soldiers in the Army as a leader. Once I leave a unit maybe.

 

[Ruptga]

Same with soldiers in the Army as a leader. Once I leave a unit maybe.

Or in any job ever. Work, friends, and family are three groups that I always keep separate if I can help it. It's just good policy.

 

[doubledeluxe]

So you know what the effect of a video of an authority figure jerking off is to a child? BS you do. Accident or not, he has harmed a child and he needs to be punished for that. Just because the harm is not quantifiable in your pea brain doesn't mean a child wasn't harmed.

You're crazy.

 

[Blanky]

So you know what the effect of a video of an authority figure jerking off is to a child? BS you do. Accident or not, he has harmed a child and he needs to be punished for that. Just because the harm is not quantifiable in your pea brain doesn't mean a child wasn't harmed.

You claimed to know the effect before I did. Doesn't your pea brain realize you are condemning me for what you did first? Lastly, likely as a result of your pea brain, you didn't understand what I said despite it being very simple. I never said he didn't harm a child. I said comparing this to an actual drunk driving accident made you a little bit insane. It is almost like you don't realize there are varying degrees of harm one can cause another.

Based on your crazy response I am thus classifying you as even more insane than before you wrote it.

 

[SP33Demon]

You claimed to know the effect before I did. Doesn't your pea brain realize you are condemning me for what you did first? Lastly, likely as a result of your pea brain, you didn't understand what I said despite it being very simple. I never said he didn't harm a child. I said comparing this to an actual drunk driving accident made you a little bit insane. It is almost like you don't realize there are varying degrees of harm one can cause another.

Based on your crazy response I am thus classifying you as even more insane than before you wrote it.

You cannot comprehend that there is a magnitude of harm that depends on the person. Some can deal with it, others cannot. This is analogous to the magnitude of harm done to a drunk driving victim which, outside of physical, is a very similar example of mental harm. Mental pain which some can deal with, and others not so well. Some may never be able to trust again which could mean being on a team or driving a car. Sad that I have to spell this out to you, but at least you finally admit the child was harmed.

 

[Ruptga]

In this thread: adults of questionable intelligence want to lock people away because of harm they might have caused, or because not doing so might "encourage" other people to cause legitimate harm.

Because that's how adults act in a free society.

 

[Blanky]

You cannot comprehend that there is a magnitude of harm that depends on the person. Some can deal with it, others cannot. This is analogous to the magnitude of harm done to a drunk driving victim which, outside of physical, is a very similar example of mental harm. Mental pain which some can deal with, and others not so well. Some may never be able to trust again which could mean being on a team or driving a car. Sad that I have to spell this out to you, but at least you finally admit the child was harmed.

Never said he caused no harm, stop lying.

Second, might != did. Learn how math and logic works, please. That a person *might* be severely harmed is not analogous to a car accident in which somebody absolutely *was* harmed.

Sad that I have to spell this out to you, but at least others can see how insane you are.

 

[marincounty]

Did you get my email yet?

 

[blackangst1]

recording a 10-second video clip of the act

10-second
10-second

10-second