That's the problem with media convictions, they don't always stand scrutiny.Somehow, and also somehow unshockingly, this piece of shit is getting away with it
Justice Department declines to charge Rep. Matt Gaetz in sex trafficking probe
Career federal prosecutors informed witnesses of the decision Wednesday.www.cbsnews.com
Not sure what you mean by that - the media never said he would be convicted of anything, they just reported on the facts of the case they were aware of, which strongly indicate misconduct by Gaetz. Just because that misconduct won't land him in prison doesn't mean we should pretend it doesn't exist. I assume you accept that OJ killed Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman even though he wasn't convicted, for example.That's the problem with media convictions, they don't always stand scrutiny.
Obviously people that are guilty do manage to walk away, my point is that Gaetz wasn't even charged, that demonstrates a lack of evidence.
I simply assumed the story was true because the guy is so creepy looking, and the few things I read about it assumed his guilt. If you take a look at the thread title right up at the top of the page, there is an assumption of guilt there as well.
Obviously people that are guilty do manage to walk away, my point is that Gaetz wasn't even charged, that demonstrates a lack of evidence.
I mean I think his guilt as to some sort of misconduct here is much more likely than not. I mean why was he transferring large sums of money to his friend who was indicted for sex trafficking, who then forwarded that money to young girls? Maybe you can't secure a conviction based on that but it stinks to high heaven.I simply assumed the story was true because the guy is so creepy looking, and the few things I read about it assumed his guilt. If you take a look at the thread title right up at the top of the page, there is an assumption of guilt there as well.
The part in bold is the complete answer.Federal prosecutors almost never charge unless they are very confident of obtaining a conviction. It sounds like their witness to the sex trafficking charge itself was unreliable so that's a pretty big problem for securing a conviction.
I mean I think his guilt as to some sort of misconduct here is much more likely than not. I mean why was he transferring large sums of money to his friend who was indicted for sex trafficking, who then forwarded that money to young girls? Maybe you can't secure a conviction based on that but it stinks to high heaven.
While there isn't 'proof' there is most certainly extensive evidence. Again, don't you find it a little odd that he was sending money to his sex trafficker friend who was then forwarding it to young girls? That's not sufficient to charge someone with solicitation of prostitution or sex trafficking or whatever but it's pretty hard to think of an innocent explanation for that.The part in bold is the complete answer.
Like I said, the guy is creepy, so I simply accepted the story. The problem is there isn't any proof.
Ftfy.The part in bold is the complete answer.
Like I said, the guy is creepy, so I simply accepted the story. The problem is there isn't any proof that would definitely lead to a conviction.
The clown show continues...
Matt regurgitates China propaganda to support cutting aid to Ukraine.
Gaetz flustered after Pentagon official calls him out for citing Chinese “propaganda” to his face | Salon.com
And you have to consider that there likely may be enough evidence to charge him with statutory rape under Florida state law (age of consent is 18 there), but that's a state crime and it's not like a right wing Florida DOJ is going to prosecute one of its own.While there isn't 'proof' there is most certainly extensive evidence. Again, don't you find it a little odd that he was sending money to his sex trafficker friend who was then forwarding it to young girls? That's not sufficient to charge someone with solicitation of prostitution or sex trafficking or whatever but it's pretty hard to think of an innocent explanation for that.
What is this…Christmas????
Matt Gaetz May Have Trouble Ahead — House Ethics Committee Quietly Reopens Its Probe into His Conduct: Report
Punchbowl News reports that the House Ethics Committee has quietly reopened a probe into the Republican rep.www.yahoo.com
Freedom Caucus: “Quick! We need a diversion!!”
McCarthy: “What do you have in mind?”
Gaetz: “We need to open investigations!!!”
…
[McCarthy reopens ethics probe into Gaetz]
Gaetz: “Wait…what???”
And don't forget the "stocking stuffers" like SCOUTS smacking down Alabama gerrymandering. So much winning.... and I ain't getting tired of it.What is this…Christmas????
Matt Gaetz May Have Trouble Ahead — House Ethics Committee Quietly Reopens Its Probe into His Conduct: Report
Punchbowl News reports that the House Ethics Committee has quietly reopened a probe into the Republican rep.www.yahoo.com
Freedom Caucus: “Quick! We need a diversion!!”
McCarthy: “What do you have in mind?”
Gaetz: “We need to open investigations!!!”
…
[McCarthy reopens ethics probe into Gaetz]
Gaetz: “Wait…what???”
stuffing small cavities is what got the SCOUTS in hot water a few years ago like that was a shocker, bunch of fucking nonces working with young boys, oh the shock.And don't forget the "stocking stuffers" like SCOUTS smacking down Alabama gerrymandering. So much winning.... and I ain't getting tired of it.
Pretty fucking ridiculous to say there should be no male teachers cause one might be a perv when theres no shortage of female pervs teachers.stuffing small cavities is what got the SCOUTS in hot water a few years ago like that was a shocker, bunch of fucking nonces working with young boys, oh the shock.
stick a bunch of kids with a group of adult men with self issues and there's gonna be some molesting going on. why i disprove of male teachers for young children. always a perv among them.
you must have meant SCOTUS but we'll roll with this since Matt Gaetz is a perv weirdo.