Nice find, though the $20 instant rebate is not applied I would imagine. So the SATA version would be $20 more than the PATA, probably worth it?
Edit - Also the SATA version just has 8MB Cache. So if you don't mind the more difficult connection of a PATA drive, and considering the PATA drive has double the cache, and $20 less, wouldn't that still be the best one to get? Or would SATA make that much of a diff?
Edit #2- The part # listed on CompUSA's website is L01M250, for the 250GB SATA drive listed in this post. On CUSA's web listing, they list 8MB of cache. But on Maxtor's listing -
Link, near the bottom, the part #L01M250 is listed as 16MB of cache. So that's a little confusing, I guess I'd believe Maxtor on their own product over CUSA, but who knows.
Edit #3 - Doh, now I found another Maxtor listing that lists the #L01M250 drive as 8MB Cache, geez. - Doh, can't find it now, I'll see if I can (in case anybody is actually reading my updates =P)