Yes, this pretty accurately describes how you response to people here. So somewhat self aware I suppose.
Is it right wing because those are the people you think use it the most, or is it right wing because it follows from right wing beliefs?
As for the labels, I disagree with those. I think he believes the things he says. So when I say that BLM has advocated for segregation and that is bad, he truly believes that I am actually saying that whites are the true victims.
It's the whole "Cucks!" song & dance in a different wrapper.
^ literally "I know you are but what am I" --totally oblivious winners
Lol did you just double down and use an arrow? Haha. Enjoy winning sport.
It's the whole "Cucks!" song & dance in a different wrapper.
No, I'm pointing how routinely you own yourself.
Are you now bringing up your relationships?
Ha, this is actually more fun that I thought. I might be starting to understand him.
Hey, what I do when my girlfriend is away is private. Its also supposed to be healthy to do regularly.
^ Conservative brain trust.
Yep conservative. That is why I never vote conservative, or do anything that would be considered promoting conservatism. Well, other than saying the opposite of what they believe in a secret way to actually promote conservatism. Its truly a master plan. Argue against their beliefs which actually promotes them through iIluminati magic.
Sure, just like Chicken et al. Unclear if even jhhnn is dumb enough to believe this.
I already explained this to you. I am not registered to vote, so it is in fact impossible for me to vote conservative. You already admit that I advocate against their ideas. You just think that I do so to somehow trick people into accepting conservatism.
Tell me, do you believe 9/11 was an inside job? Do you believe in Chemtrails?
Conservative brain trust sure makes a compelling case that it's impossible for someone who largely parrots conservative media to be conservative.
Let me help you. Parroting is when you say the same thing as another to promote that thing. I am literally doing the opposite. I am saying that conservatism is worse for society. We should be progressive in our ideas.
Google the meaning of opposite and you will see your error. Words is hard for you it seems.
Unless, you can show me where I have parroted something from the conservative media. Or is this one of your iIluminati conspiracies again?
Keep in mind anyone can click on your profile and see all the conservative think tank econ talking points in the first few pages. Degens are pretty shit liars for how much practice they get.
Lol, like what? Capitalism and free trade? Oh you got me there. We better go to Socialism or Communism so we don't end up Fascist. Haha, when did Capitalism become conservative?
So is that it tiger? You blew your load on Capitalism as the proof I am a conservative? Can't win them all now can you...
I'm sure jhhnn types will also believe that parroting conservative talking points is no more proof of conservatism than parroting the klan is proof of racism.
Wait, was it really promoting Capitalism as your proof of parroting? No way really?
In all fairness the other conservatives parroting the klan talking points about mexican rapists, muslim terrorist, black criminals and so on same as you do the heritage foundation about socialism, regulation, monopolies, and everything else manage to convince dumbshit tier democrats they're not racist/conservatives.
Um, you sure that is the cross you want to die on there kiddo?
Regulation - perfectly fine if the feedback mechanism of a free market does not give the desired outcome such as pollution.
Monopolies - do not form in capitalism unless backed by powers outside of the market. Monopolies that are long lasting are typically bad for society and should be dismantled when this happens. As mentioned, they usually cannot survive without the help of the state in capitalism.
Socialism - typically breaks the feedback mechanism and as such leaves those with power to enforce their will upon those without. This can be a problem in capitalism but typically to a much lesser extent.
Lastly dummy, how are any of these things racist? Each thing is simply a tool and tools themselves are not inherently racist. Its true that the people who are part of these systems can be racist, but the system themselves are not inherently racist. So did you really thing those things exemplify your claim?
Pointing is also done unconsciously when a person, say, a case study in the Dunning-Kruger effect, finds him or her self so often imagining he or she sees it in others. That would be pointing, alright, but now how you imagine.I'm pointing out how routinely dunning kruger posterkids own themselves. Pointing is often done with arrows.
Takes some hardcore degeneracy to literally parrot the heritage foundation while denying any conservatism. Also doesn't help your claim to possess much brains while bragging about poor reading comprehension.
Which part is a parrot of the heritage foundation?
Name a monopoly that has lasted that is not propped up by the state.
Socialism by definition breaks feedback as the means of production are controlled from the top down.
Regulation works perfectly fine when the market gives outcomes which are not optimal.
Did the foundation also say the sky typically looks blue, because if so then I can see agreeing with them.
Monopolies - do not form in capitalism unless backed by powers outside of the market. Monopolies that are long lasting are typically bad for society and should be dismantled when this happens. As mentioned, they usually cannot survive without the help of the state in capitalism.
Pointing is also done unconsciously when a person, say, a case study in the Dunning-Kruger effect, finds him or her self so often imagining he or she sees it in others. That would be pointing, alright, but now how you imagine.
It's no wonder you constantly run down psychological theories. Your lack of self awareness makes the subject opaque to you. Your half baked appeals to your superior reasoning skills fool only people similarly handicapped by contempt for what they can't understand.
And remember, I wouldn't waste my time telling you all of this were it not my intention to inform others that you are a fanatic and like all fanatics have ideas that if generally agreed upon would be dangerous for society, and particular the one I live in.
Monopolies always form without regulation and it's a natural outcome of pure capitalism.
Then again, there is only one example of a capitalist system in the history of mankind.
All successful (to the society) systems are based on mixed economies (a free market regulated by government).