I have two nForce 2 systems in my house. Both have been alright...no major problems, but I've had better. Even my Abit KR7A-RAID and it's VIA KT266A chipset made me happier.
The nForce 2 boards seem to be full of bugs. Even after the several revisions of some boards, problems still exist. Off the top of my head:
-MAJOR memory compatibility issues
-Prone to BIOS corruption/Failure to POST
-Incompatibility with some Western Digital hard drives
-IDE corruption
-Some boards have problems with the sound
If VIA had made this chipset, I really doubt it would be selling as well...there are too many people that bash them VIA, and this would just add fuel to the fire.
I am merely pleased with my nForce 2 boards. My old KT133A and KT266A boards seemed to be more solid and problem-free. I think one of the main reasons the nForce 2 has such great user feedback are the abundance of features. It's full of nice stuff. However, I don't care about any of that since there are so many problems! What good is a feature-rich board if it's buggy?
OH: Not only am I merely satisfied with my nForce 2, but I had a horrible experience with an nForce 1, too. I eventually got everything taken care of. So, here's my view:
nVidia Chipsets:
-Lots of Features
-Fast
-OC well
-BUGGY, full of problems
VIA chipsets:
-Not quite as feature rich or quick
-Fewer Issues, greater stability
At least that's how things have been for me. I have my Abit KR7A-RAID running in the other room, and it hasn't crashed since I rebuilt that rig (I had the KR7A in this rig before getting the nForce 2). That was months ago...I can't say that for my nForce 2 It's very stable, but it's not a rock like my KR7A.
The nForce 2 boards seem to be full of bugs. Even after the several revisions of some boards, problems still exist. Off the top of my head:
-MAJOR memory compatibility issues
-Prone to BIOS corruption/Failure to POST
-Incompatibility with some Western Digital hard drives
-IDE corruption
-Some boards have problems with the sound
If VIA had made this chipset, I really doubt it would be selling as well...there are too many people that bash them VIA, and this would just add fuel to the fire.
I am merely pleased with my nForce 2 boards. My old KT133A and KT266A boards seemed to be more solid and problem-free. I think one of the main reasons the nForce 2 has such great user feedback are the abundance of features. It's full of nice stuff. However, I don't care about any of that since there are so many problems! What good is a feature-rich board if it's buggy?
OH: Not only am I merely satisfied with my nForce 2, but I had a horrible experience with an nForce 1, too. I eventually got everything taken care of. So, here's my view:
nVidia Chipsets:
-Lots of Features
-Fast
-OC well
-BUGGY, full of problems
VIA chipsets:
-Not quite as feature rich or quick
-Fewer Issues, greater stability
At least that's how things have been for me. I have my Abit KR7A-RAID running in the other room, and it hasn't crashed since I rebuilt that rig (I had the KR7A in this rig before getting the nForce 2). That was months ago...I can't say that for my nForce 2 It's very stable, but it's not a rock like my KR7A.