If they paid 15 dollars an hour i likely would not be able or willing to pay the outrageous prices needed to keep them in business, so it wouldnt matter.
No, if they paid $15 an hour they wouldn't need 20 people working there during rush. I've seen under 10 hold it down in a major way during a rush back in the 90's when I worked there as a teen. This is another logical fallacy people use to justify their copy and paste ideology.
You said that if you offer low wages, you get low quality people. You then equated some people with having value below the amount of money required to have a living wage.
If you believe that offering more money would bring in better people, then you believe those who make less are sub equal.
Also, that is pretty weak to accuse me of being an alt for someone. I'm not sure how I could verify that I'm not an alt, but its just really weak to make that accusation.
Some people are sub equal. Some people are not as smart, some not as fast, some not as imaginative. Why should we punish people for being born with lesser talents than others? Do you honestly think that paying these people a wage that makes their life unbearable is the answer? What does that say about you as a person?
The hilarious part is that Republicans don't even realize they've already lost this argument. Through welfare and other sources, these people learn they can earn more money by just breeding more. This creates more Dem voters because these kids grow up in poverty. You are fighting a battle you lost almost a hundred years ago, and you don't even realize it.
This is why I keep pushing for a guaranteed income for all. You can instantly do away with food stamps, welfare, social security, etc. while also encouraging the lesser people to have less children because more children now costs more money instead of making them more money.
As for the accusation, the tone and content of your post suggested that to be the case...I'm still on the fence given your retort.