Are you talking about Between 2003 and 2009?. The Bush White House “lost” 22 million emails.
http://www.newsweek.com/2016/09/23/george-w-bush-white-house-lost-22-million-emails-497373.html
Well, when caught using private servers for official government business the Bushies did turn over all the RNC servers and all the backup tapes to the National Archives so that they could determine which emails were official business and should be preserved, even though that gave the National Archives people access to all the RNC's political and personal emails on those servers. Compare that to Hillary Clinton who, when caught using a private server for ALL her official business, hired professionals to wipe the data and physically destroy the media, then gave printed versions of selected emails. Sometimes selectively edited selected emails. In honesty and accountability, the Bushies are head and shoulders above the Hildabeast.
Whelp, just heard it on ABC News radio;Trump has gone all in and says that it's a 'conspiracy by the media and bankers' to bring down his candidacy. Dog whistle ahoy!
Whelp, just heard it on ABC News radio;Trump has gone all in and says that it's a 'conspiracy by the media and bankers' to bring down his candidacy. Dog whistle ahoy!
And you don't think that is by design? Come on now, only simpletons think this was "just discovered" -- not saying you are one, just speaking in general terms about the American public. The media and/or the Clintons sat on this waiting to spring it. They could have dumped this earlier in the election cycle. Kind of like what is happening with Wikileaks now. It is by design that all of this garbage is dumped about both candidates this late.
And to address your last point, yes, Republicans could have dug up more dirt on Trump and probably should have. Still just as bad is that the DNC and the party in general lets Hillary run and get nominated when she has so much negative favorability. Seriously, they couldn't find anyone more likable and suited to do the job? Or is it just because "it is her turn"?
Just about anyone from either party would instantly be more electable if they went up against either of these two people that we have now.
And you don't think that is by design? Come on now, only simpletons think this was "just discovered" -- not saying you are one, just speaking in general terms about the American public. The media and/or the Clintons sat on this waiting to spring it. They could have dumped this earlier in the election cycle. Kind of like what is happening with Wikileaks now. It is by design that all of this garbage is dumped about both candidates this late.
And to address your last point, yes, Republicans could have dug up more dirt on Trump and probably should have. Still just as bad is that the DNC and the party in general lets Hillary run and get nominated when she has so much negative favorability. Seriously, they couldn't find anyone more likable and suited to do the job? Or is it just because "it is her turn"?
Just about anyone from either party would instantly be more electable if they went up against either of these two people that we have now.
And you don't think that is by design? Come on now, only simpletons think this was "just discovered" -- not saying you are one, just speaking in general terms about the American public. The media and/or the Clintons sat on this waiting to spring it. They could have dumped this earlier in the election cycle. Kind of like what is happening with Wikileaks now. It is by design that all of this garbage is dumped about both candidates this late.
And to address your last point, yes, Republicans could have dug up more dirt on Trump and probably should have. Still just as bad is that the DNC and the party in general lets Hillary run and get nominated when she has so much negative favorability. Seriously, they couldn't find anyone more likable and suited to do the job? Or is it just because "it is her turn"?
Just about anyone from either party would instantly be more electable if they went up against either of these two people that we have now.
And you don't think that is by design? Come on now, only simpletons think this was "just discovered" -- not saying you are one, just speaking in general terms about the American public. The media and/or the Clintons sat on this waiting to spring it. They could have dumped this earlier in the election cycle. Kind of like what is happening with Wikileaks now. It is by design that all of this garbage is dumped about both candidates this late.
And to address your last point, yes, Republicans could have dug up more dirt on Trump and probably should have. Still just as bad is that the DNC and the party in general lets Hillary run and get nominated when she has so much negative favorability. Seriously, they couldn't find anyone more likable and suited to do the job? Or is it just because "it is her turn"?
Just about anyone from either party would instantly be more electable if they went up against either of these two people that we have now.
Same every election - the liberal news outlets claim to have just received the negative material that has existed for decades. Not buying it.
That was my point, that (using your numbers) 20% of the population get right-slanted news from Fox News but 80% get left-slanted news from ABC/CBS/CNN/NBC/MSNBC. There is no point in claiming that Fox News is some sort of influence because in the overall scheme of things, they are simply preaching to the choir. I'm pretty conservative and even I don't watch it. (Although I would if I were available when Shep Smith or Brett Bair (sp?) were on, it's just that when I am available to consume TV news, Fox is all annoying echo chamber in pretty pole dancer packages.)
Only because you don't understand the concept of professionalism.
I understand human nature. You someone think that people can completely turn off their liberal bias.
I didn't actually say what you say that I said. You'd make a terrible journalist. I'm guessing you don't make a great professional either.I understand human nature. You someone think that people can completely turn off their liberal bias.
Glenn Greenwald wrote an excellent article about the DNC echo chamber. With absolutely no evidence of tampering, all of the wikileaks emails are thrown out as invalid.
https://theintercept.com/2016/10/11...nconvenient-truths-are-recast-as-putin-plots/
Please read that article before replying to me. If you still believe there's no conspiracy, there's nothing in the world that will change your mind.
Wait... you think this proves there's a conspiracy of what?Glenn Greenwald wrote an excellent article about the DNC echo chamber. With absolutely no evidence of tampering, all of the wikileaks emails are thrown out as invalid.
https://theintercept.com/2016/10/11...nconvenient-truths-are-recast-as-putin-plots/
Please read that article before replying to me. If you still believe there's no conspiracy, there's nothing in the world that will change your mind.
I read it and I will continue to treat Democratic claims the same way I treat Republican claims, verify.
Anyone who doesn't will more than likely be susceptible to propaganda. And yes, I already saw how the Clinton/Democrat camp was spinning these emails but I didn't think much of it as I haven't seen the talking point being parroted around here.
Regardless of how you feel about the candidates the media collusion with the Clinton campaign as evidenced by all of the recent email dumps should be worrisome for all of us. We rely on journalist to be our government watchdogs, and their independence is critical to a fully functioning democracy. There's been plenty come out that shows some of our leading news organizations being a bit too cozy with Clinton staffers, given this how can they adequately fulfill their role as watchdogs?
The entire fourth estate rallying behind one candidate, allowing that candidate to ghostwrite anything, and reporting allegation or confirmed falsehood as fact, potential harming our foreign relations and in documented cases actually conspiring isn't a small thing.Wait... you think this proves there's a conspiracy of what?
All this does is show that Dems are susceptible to the same poor thinking in which Rep's frequently take pride.
This is not news.
The entire fourth estate rallying behind one candidate, allowing that candidate to ghostwrite anything, and reporting allegation or confirmed falsehood as fact, potential harming our foreign relations and in documented cases actually conspiring isn't a small thing.
Fascinating that this is happening when Trump is being painted as the fascist.
Fascinating that anybody could believe any of that. It's pure conspiracy theory.
The entire fourth estate rallying behind one candidate, allowing that candidate to ghostwrite anything, and reporting allegation or confirmed falsehood as fact, potential harming our foreign relations and in documented cases actually conspiring isn't a small thing.
Fascinating that this is happening when Trump is being painted as the fascist.
The entire fourth estate rallying behind one candidate, allowing that candidate to ghostwrite anything, and reporting allegation or confirmed falsehood as fact, potential harming our foreign relations and in documented cases actually conspiring isn't a small thing.
Fascinating that this is happening when Trump is being painted as the fascist.
BAH HA HA HA ha ha ha ha ha ha.The entire fourth estate rallying behind one candidate, allowing that candidate to ghostwrite anything, and reporting allegation or confirmed falsehood as fact, potential harming our foreign relations and in documented cases actually conspiring isn't a small thing.
Fascinating that this is happening when Trump is being painted as the fascist.