Media Repression in a ?Liberated? Land -

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0

Media Repression in a ?Liberated? Land

by Dahr Jamail

published by Voices in the Wilderness

Media Repression in a ?Liberated? Land

Journalists are increasingly being detained and threatened by the U.S.-installed interim government in Iraq. Media have been stopped particularly from covering recent horrific events in Fallujah.

The ?100 Orders? penned by former U.S. administrator in Iraq L. Paul Bremer include Order 65 passed March 20 to establish an Iraqi communications and media commission. This commission has powers to control the media because it has complete control over licensing and regulating telecommunications, broadcasting, information services and all other media establishments.

On June 28 when the United States handed over power to a ?sovereign? Iraqi interim government, Bremer simply passed on the authority to Ayad Allawi, the U.S.-installed interim prime minister who has had longstanding ties with the British intelligence service MI6 and the CIA.

A glaring instance is the curbs placed on the Qatar-based TV channel al-Jazeera.

Within days of the ?handover? of power to an interim Iraqi government last summer, the Baghdad office of al-Jazeera was raided and closed by security forces from the interim government. The network was accused of inaccurate reporting and banned initially for one month from reporting out of Iraq.

The ban was then extended ?indefinitely.? On Tuesday this week the interim government announced that any al-Jazeera journalist found reporting in Iraq would be detained.

The al-Jazeera office in Baghdad had been bombed by a U.S. warplane during the invasion of March last year. The TV channel had given their exact coordinates to the Pentagon to avoid such an occurrence. One of their journalists was killed in the bombing.

Al-Jazeera now broadcasts a daily apology ?because we cannot cover Iraq news well since our offices have been closed for over three months by orders from the interim government.?

Other instances of political repression abound. The media commission sent out an order recently asking news organisations to ?stick to the government line on the U.S.-led offensive in Fallujah or face legal action.? The warning was sent on the letterhead of Allawi.

The letter also asked media to ?set aside space in your news coverage to make the position of the Iraqi government, which expresses the aspirations of most Iraqis, clear.?

Last week a journalist for the al-Arabiya network was detained by U.S. forces outside Fallujah when he attempted to enter the besieged city.

Citing another al-Arabiya correspondent as its source, the U.S.-based Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) said the Arabic satellite station had lost contact with Abdel Kader Saadi, a reporter and photographer living and working in the Sunni Muslim city, on Nov. 11.

French freelance photographer Corentin Fleury was detained by the U.S. military with his interpreter, 28 year-old Bahktiyar Abdulla Hadad when they were leaving Fallujah just before the siege of the city began.

They had worked in the city for nine days leading up to the siege, and were held for five days in a military detention facility outside the city.

?They were very nervous and they asked us what we saw, and looked over all my photos, asking me questions about them,? Fleury told IPS. ?They asked where the weapons were, what the neighborhoods were like, all of this.?

Fleury said he had photographed homes destroyed by U.S. warplanes, and life in the city leading up to the siege.

?They wanted information from me regarding the situation in Fallujah, but they have yet to release my translator,? he said. ?I made a silly photo of him holding a sniper rifle, and I think this is why they are holding him. I?ve been trying to get information for the last five days on him, and the French embassy has been trying to get him out, different journalists he?s worked with are sending letters, but there has been no luck so far.?

 

0marTheZealot

Golden Member
Apr 5, 2004
1,692
0
0
^
Actually, from what I've read on Al Jareeza, they actually do portray the news fairly well.

They had an interview with Kenneth Deffreyes and Matthew Simmons that I found rather impressive.
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
Originally posted by: BAMAVOO
al-Jazeera = the suck

why should they be able to broadcast?

Uh, because of something called 'freedom of the press'.

Look it up. It's one of the basic rights guaranteed in our Constitution and, after the WMD thing didn't work out, Bush's excuse for the bloodbath in Iraq switched to this 'freedom and democracy' thing. You can't have freedom and democracy without freedom of the press. Whether you, Bush, Bremer, or Allawi agree with the press or not.

 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: BAMAVOO
al-Jazeera = the suck

why should they be able to broadcast?

Uh, because of something called 'freedom of the press'.

Look it up. It's one of the basic rights guaranteed in our Constitution and, after the WMD thing didn't work out, Bush's excuse for the bloodbath in Iraq switched to this 'freedom and democracy' thing. You can't have freedom and democracy without freedom of the press. Whether you, Bush, Bremer, or Allawi agree with the press or not.
The US Constitution does not apply in Iraq.

Nor does freedom of the press include the freedom to incite violence, here or elsewhere. If Dan Rather got on TV and urged everything to begin killing fundamentalist Christians or Republicans (and I'm sure he'd love to be able to do that) he and CBS would be shutdown in a heartbeat, so let's stop with the pretenses about freedoms and all that jazz. Freedom does not and never had meant you are free to do whatever the fvck you please, in a democracy or anywhere else.
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: BAMAVOO
al-Jazeera = the suck

why should they be able to broadcast?

Uh, because of something called 'freedom of the press'.

Look it up. It's one of the basic rights guaranteed in our Constitution and, after the WMD thing didn't work out, Bush's excuse for the bloodbath in Iraq switched to this 'freedom and democracy' thing. You can't have freedom and democracy without freedom of the press. Whether you, Bush, Bremer, or Allawi agree with the press or not.
The US Constitution does not apply in Iraq.

Nor does freedom of the press include the freedom to incite violence, here or elsewhere. If Dan Rather got on TV and urged everything to begin killing fundamentalist Christians or Republicans (and I'm sure he'd love to be able to do that) he and CBS would be shutdown in a heartbeat, so let's stop with the pretenses about freedoms and all that jazz. Freedom does not and never had meant you are free to do whatever the fvck you please, in a democracy or anywhere else.

And just who are you referring to? Who is doing whatever they please? Who is inciting violence by reporting the news?

And if the U.S. Constitution doesn't apply in Iraq, then is the 'freedom and democracy' excuse for Bush's invasion as much a lie as the WMD excuse?

 

SarcasticDwarf

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2001
9,574
1
76
Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
^
Actually, from what I've read on Al Jareeza, they actually do portray the news fairly well.


Read between the lines on their website. The reporting is actually worse than CNN.
Also, their English written news is much, much different than their broadcast news that I have seen.
 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
Originally posted by: SarcasticDwarf
Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
^
Actually, from what I've read on Al Jareeza, they actually do portray the news fairly well.


Read between the lines on their website. The reporting is actually worse than CNN.
Also, their English written news is much, much different than their broadcast news that I have seen.

LOL did you just accuse CNN of bias? Hilarity. If you want innaccurate reporting just check out Faux News.
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
This isn't about one news outlet. This is about the interim PM of Iraq telling newspapers what they must include in their coverage and threatening them with legal action if they fail to follow orders.

This is by no stretch of the imagination 'free press'. There is no WMD in Iraq. There is no freedom and democracy in Iraq. What exactly is Bush's excuse for conducting naked aggression against Iraq?

 

Tylanner

Diamond Member
Sep 18, 2004
5,481
2
81
Real source of this document, Quality News :roll:

"...American soldiers the opportunity to avenge dead friends by taking a life was a moment of sheer exhilaration."

An Affiliate of the source

"Fallujah and Mosul are under attack. Over a dozen other Iraqi towns are under the threat of further major assault by US forces. JNV supports those organising activities to try to halt these assaults and prevent further massive attacks"
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: BAMAVOO
al-Jazeera = the suck

why should they be able to broadcast?

Uh, because of something called 'freedom of the press'.

Look it up. It's one of the basic rights guaranteed in our Constitution and, after the WMD thing didn't work out, Bush's excuse for the bloodbath in Iraq switched to this 'freedom and democracy' thing. You can't have freedom and democracy without freedom of the press. Whether you, Bush, Bremer, or Allawi agree with the press or not.
The US Constitution does not apply in Iraq.

Nor does freedom of the press include the freedom to incite violence, here or elsewhere. If Dan Rather got on TV and urged everything to begin killing fundamentalist Christians or Republicans (and I'm sure he'd love to be able to do that) he and CBS would be shutdown in a heartbeat, so let's stop with the pretenses about freedoms and all that jazz. Freedom does not and never had meant you are free to do whatever the fvck you please, in a democracy or anywhere else.

And just who are you referring to? Who is doing whatever they please? Who is inciting violence by reporting the news?
AJ was inciting violence according to Allawi. It was his call to make and he did.

And if the U.S. Constitution doesn't apply in Iraq, then is the 'freedom and democracy' excuse for Bush's invasion as much a lie as the WMD excuse?
Need more straw for that man you're building?
 

arsbanned

Banned
Dec 12, 2003
4,853
0
0
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: BAMAVOO
al-Jazeera = the suck

why should they be able to broadcast?

Uh, because of something called 'freedom of the press'.

Look it up. It's one of the basic rights guaranteed in our Constitution and, after the WMD thing didn't work out, Bush's excuse for the bloodbath in Iraq switched to this 'freedom and democracy' thing. You can't have freedom and democracy without freedom of the press. Whether you, Bush, Bremer, or Allawi agree with the press or not.
The US Constitution does not apply in Iraq.

Nor does freedom of the press include the freedom to incite violence, here or elsewhere. If Dan Rather got on TV and urged everything to begin killing fundamentalist Christians or Republicans (and I'm sure he'd love to be able to do that) he and CBS would be shutdown in a heartbeat, so let's stop with the pretenses about freedoms and all that jazz. Freedom does not and never had meant you are free to do whatever the fvck you please, in a democracy or anywhere else.

Oh yes Dan Rather would certainly like to murder Republicans. Evidence abounds....
You sound like a wacked out foaming at the mouth right-winger. Oh wait.
 

AFB

Lifer
Jan 10, 2004
10,718
3
0
Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
^
Actually, from what I've read on Al Jareeza, they actually do portray the news fairly well.

They had an interview with Kenneth Deffreyes and Matthew Simmons that I found rather impressive.

See sig. Most of their stuff is pretty balanced(Atleast the Engrish versions).
 

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: BAMAVOO
al-Jazeera = the suck

why should they be able to broadcast?

Uh, because of something called 'freedom of the press'.

Look it up. It's one of the basic rights guaranteed in our Constitution and, after the WMD thing didn't work out, Bush's excuse for the bloodbath in Iraq switched to this 'freedom and democracy' thing. You can't have freedom and democracy without freedom of the press. Whether you, Bush, Bremer, or Allawi agree with the press or not.

Can you show me where it says "freedom of the press" in the Constitution?
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Originally posted by: arsbanned
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: BAMAVOO
al-Jazeera = the suck

why should they be able to broadcast?

Uh, because of something called 'freedom of the press'.

Look it up. It's one of the basic rights guaranteed in our Constitution and, after the WMD thing didn't work out, Bush's excuse for the bloodbath in Iraq switched to this 'freedom and democracy' thing. You can't have freedom and democracy without freedom of the press. Whether you, Bush, Bremer, or Allawi agree with the press or not.
The US Constitution does not apply in Iraq.

Nor does freedom of the press include the freedom to incite violence, here or elsewhere. If Dan Rather got on TV and urged everything to begin killing fundamentalist Christians or Republicans (and I'm sure he'd love to be able to do that) he and CBS would be shutdown in a heartbeat, so let's stop with the pretenses about freedoms and all that jazz. Freedom does not and never had meant you are free to do whatever the fvck you please, in a democracy or anywhere else.

Oh yes Dan Rather would certainly like to murder Republicans. Evidence abounds....
You sound like a wacked out foaming at the mouth right-winger. Oh wait.
Or maybe I sound like the mirror of a whacked out liberal fruitcake.

Assumptive...check.

Hyperbolic...check.

Speculative...check.

See, I am a liberal.

:laugh:
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

 

imported_Aelius

Golden Member
Apr 25, 2004
1,988
0
0
Originally posted by: BBond
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

U.S. Constitution: First Amendment
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Originally posted by: Aelius
Originally posted by: BBond
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

U.S. Constitution: First Amendment
What's the Iraqi Constitution say?

 

Tylanner

Diamond Member
Sep 18, 2004
5,481
2
81
Originally posted by: BBond
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Nice to see you are finally concerned about the freedoms of the Iraqi people.

Welcome, I'm proud of you. :roll:
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: Aelius
Originally posted by: BBond
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

U.S. Constitution: First Amendment
What's the Iraqi Constitution say?

LAW OF ADMINISTRATION FOR THE STATE OF IRAQ FOR THE TRANSITIONAL PERIOD

CHAPTER ONE ? FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES

Article 3.

(A) This Law is the Supreme Law of the land and shall be binding in all parts of Iraq without exception. No amendment to this Law may be made except by a three-fourths majority of the members of the National Assembly and the unanimous approval of the Presidency Council. Likewise, no amendment may be made that could abridge in any way the rights of the Iraqi people cited in Chapter Two; extend the transitional period beyond the timeframe cited in this Law; delay the holding of elections to a new assembly; reduce the powers of the regions or governorates; or affect Islam, or any other religions or sects and their rites.

(B) Any legal provision that conflicts with this Law is null and void.

(C) This Law shall cease to have effect upon the formation of an elected government pursuant to a permanent constitution.

Article 6.

The Iraqi Transitional Government shall take effective steps to end the vestiges of the oppressive acts of the previous regime arising from forced displacement, deprivation of citizenship, expropriation of financial assets and property, and dismissal from government employment for political, racial, or sectarian reasons.

CHAPTER TWO ? FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

Article 10.

As an expression of the free will and sovereignty of the Iraqi people, their representatives shall form the governmental structures of the State of Iraq. The Iraqi Transitional Government and the governments of the regions, governorates, municipalities, and local administrations shall respect the rights of the Iraqi people, including those rights cited in this Chapter.

Article 11.

(A) Anyone who carries Iraqi nationality shall be deemed an Iraqi citizen. His citizenship shall grant him all the rights and duties stipulated in this Law and shall be the basis of his relation to the homeland and the State.

(B) No Iraqi may have his Iraqi citizenship withdrawn or be exiled unless he is a naturalized citizen who, in his application for citizenship, as established in a court of law, made material falsifications on the basis of which citizenship was granted.

(C) Each Iraqi shall have the right to carry more than one citizenship. Any Iraqi whose citizenship was withdrawn because he acquired another citizenship shall be deemed an Iraqi.

(D) Any Iraqi whose Iraqi citizenship was withdrawn for political, religious, racial, or sectarian reasons has the right to reclaim his Iraqi citizenship.

(E) Decision Number 666 (1980) of the dissolved Revolutionary Command Council is annuled, and anyone whose citizenship was withdrawn on the basis of this decree shall be deemed an Iraqi.

(F) The National Assembly must issue laws pertaining to citizenship and naturalization consistent with the provisions of this Law

(G) The Courts shall examine all disputes airising from the application of the provisions relating to citizenship.

Article 12.

All Iraqis are equal in their rights without regard to gender, sect, opinion, belief, nationality, religion, or origin, and they are equal before the law. Discrimination against an Iraqi citizen on the basis of his gender, nationality, religion, or origin is prohibited. Everyone has the right to life, liberty, and the security of his person. No one may be deprived of his life or liberty, except in accordance with legal procedures. All are equal before the courts.

Article 13.

(A) Public and private freedoms shall be protected.

(B) The right of free expression shall be protected.

(C) The right of free peaceable assembly and the right to join associations freely, as well as the right to form and join unions and political parties freely, in accordance with the law, shall be guaranteed.

(D) Each Iraqi has the right of free movement in all parts of Iraq and the right to travel abroad and return freely.

(E) Each Iraqi has the right to demonstrate and strike peaceably in accordance with the law.

(F) Each Iraqi has the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religious belief and practice. Coercion in such matters shall be prohibited.

(G) Slavery, the slave trade, forced labor, and involuntary servitude with or without pay, shall be forbidden.

(H) Each Iraqi has the right to privacy.



Article 14.

The individual has the right to security, education, health care, and social security. The Iraqi State and its governmental units, including the federal government, the regions, governorates, municipalities, and local administrations, within the limits of their resources and with due regard to other vital needs, shall strive to provide prosperity and employment opportunities to the people.

Article 15.

(A) No civil law shall have retroactive effect unless the law so stipulates. There shall be neither a crime, nor punishment, except by law in effect at the time the crime is committed.

(B) Police, investigators, or other governmental authorities may not violate the sanctity of private residences, whether these authorities belong to the federal or regional governments, governorates, municipalities, or local administrations, unless a judge or investigating magistrate has issued a search warrant in accordance with applicable law on the basis of information provided by a sworn individual who knew that bearing false witness would render him liable to punishment. Extreme exigent circumstances, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, may justify a warrantless search, but such exigencies shall be narrowly construed. In the event that a warrantless search is carried out in the absence of an extreme exigent circumstance, the evidence so seized, and any other evidence found derivatively from such search, shall be inadmissible in connection with a criminal charge, unless the court determines that the person who carried out the warrantless search believed reasonably and in good faith that the search was in accordance with the law.

(C) No one may be unlawfully arrested or detained, and no one may be detained by reason of political or religious beliefs.

(D) All persons shall be guaranteed the right to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, regardless of whether the proceeding is civil or criminal. Notice of the proceeding and its legal basis must be provided to the accused without delay.

(E) The accused is innocent until proven guilty pursuant to law, and he likewise has the right to engage independent and competent counsel, to remain silent in response to questions addressed to him with no compulsion to testify for any reason, to participate in preparing his defense, and to summon and examine witnesses or to ask the judge to do so. At the time a person is arrested, he must be notified of these rights.

(F) The right to a fair, speedy, and open trial shall be guaranteed.

(G) Every person deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall have the right of recourse to a court to determine the legality of his arrest or detention without delay and to order his release if this occurred in an illegal manner.

(H) After being found innocent of a charge, an accused may not be tried once again on the same charge.

(I) Civilians may not be tried before a military tribunal. Special or exceptional courts may not be established.

(J) Torture in all its forms, physical or mental, shall be prohibited under all circumstances, as shall be cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment. No confession made under compulsion, torture, or threat thereof shall be relied upon or admitted into evidence for any reason in any proceeding, whether criminal or otherwise.

Article 16.

(A) Public property is sacrosanct, and its protection is the duty of every citizen.

(B) The right to private property shall be protected, and no one may be prevented from disposing of his property except within the limits of law. No one shall be deprived of his property except by eminent domain, in circumstances and in the manner set forth in law, and on condition that he is paid just and timely compensation.

(C) Each Iraqi citizen shall have the full and unfettered right to own real property in all parts of Iraq without restriction.

Article 17.

It shall not be permitted to possess, bear, buy, or sell arms except on licensure issued in accordance with the law.



Article 18.

There shall be no taxation or fee except by law.

Article 19.

No political refugee who has been granted asylum pursuant to applicable law may be surrendered or returned forcibly to the country from which he fled.

Article 20.

(A) Every Iraqi who fulfills the conditions stipulated in the electoral law has the right to stand for election and cast his ballot secretly in free, open, fair, competitive, and periodic elections.

(B) No Iraqi may be discriminated against for purposes of voting in elections on the basis of gender, religion, sect, race, belief, ethnic origin, language, wealth, or literacy.

Article 21.

Neither the Iraqi Transitional Government nor the governments and administrations of the regions, governorates, and municipalities, nor local administrations may interfere with the right of the Iraqi people to develop the institutions of civil society, whether in cooperation with international civil society organizations or otherwise.

Article 22.

If, in the course of his work, an official of any government office, whether in the federal government, the regional governments, the governorate and municipal administrations, or the local administrations, deprives an individual or a group of the rights guaranteed by this Law or any other Iraqi laws in force, this individual or group shall have the right to maintain a cause of action against that employee to seek compensation for the damages caused by such deprivation, to vindicate his rights, and to seek any other legal measure. If the court decides that the official had acted with a sufficient degree of good faith and in the belief that his actions were consistent with the law, then he is not required to pay compensation.

Article 23.

The enumeration of the foregoing rights must not be interpreted to mean that they are the only rights enjoyed by the Iraqi people. They enjoy all the rights that befit a free people possessed of their human dignity, including the rights stipulated in international treaties and agreements, other instruments of international law that Iraq has signed and to which it has acceded, and others that are deemed binding upon it, and in the law of nations. Non-Iraqis within Iraq shall enjoy all human rights not inconsistent with their status as non-citizens.


 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
So there is no freedom of the press stipulated in Iraqi law.

Yet, somehow there are multiples more press currently in Iraq than during the times of that secular-sultan Saddam.

How does that work?
 

BBond

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
8,363
0
0
Oh, really?

Chapter 1

Article 6.

The Iraqi Transitional Government shall take effective steps to end the vestiges of the oppressive acts of the previous regime arising from forced displacement, deprivation of citizenship, expropriation of financial assets and property, and dismissal from government employment for political, racial, or sectarian reasons.

Chapter 2

Article 23.

The enumeration of the foregoing rights must not be interpreted to mean that they are the only rights enjoyed by the Iraqi people. They enjoy all the rights that befit a free people possessed of their human dignity, including the rights stipulated in international treaties and agreements, other instruments of international law that Iraq has signed and to which it has acceded, and others that are deemed binding upon it, and in the law of nations. Non-Iraqis within Iraq shall enjoy all human rights not inconsistent with their status as non-citizens.

 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Originally posted by: BBond
Oh, really?

Chapter 1

Article 6.

The Iraqi Transitional Government shall take effective steps to end the vestiges of the oppressive acts of the previous regime arising from forced displacement, deprivation of citizenship, expropriation of financial assets and property, and dismissal from government employment for political, racial, or sectarian reasons.

Chapter 2

Article 23.

The enumeration of the foregoing rights must not be interpreted to mean that they are the only rights enjoyed by the Iraqi people. They enjoy all the rights that befit a free people possessed of their human dignity, including the rights stipulated in international treaties and agreements, other instruments of international law that Iraq has signed and to which it has acceded, and others that are deemed binding upon it, and in the law of nations. Non-Iraqis within Iraq shall enjoy all human rights not inconsistent with their status as non-citizens.
And?

I still see no "freedom of the press" specifically stated therein.

 

CQuinn

Golden Member
May 31, 2000
1,656
0
0
I still see no "freedom of the press" specifically stated therein

Chapter 2: Article 13(B); freedom of expression carries as implicit both freedom of speech and written word.

Chapter 2: Article 23 expands upon the stated right to include the interpretation of
practices and principles already in common usage in other constitutional governments.

The U.S. Constitution is relevant to this discussion, as it was (claimed as) the primary documentary
source for the U.S. to aid Irag in creation of thier own constitutional government. As such, all the
enumerated (and many of the implied) rights accorded by the source document(s) can and should be regarded when interpreting the statements of the Iragi document.







 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |