- Oct 9, 1999
- 46,271
- 9,352
- 146
Look up the definition of trilingual: ability to speak 3 languages fluently.
Look up the percentage of the world's population that is trilingual: 13%.
Or maybe the people who determined that 13% of people are trilingual aren't fluent enough in English to understand what trilingual means.
http://ilanguages.org/bilingual.php
I've lived in the same domicile with trilingual and multilingual people. LIVED WITH THEM. And we have had extensive conversations about the depth of their abilities to be simultaneously fluent in more than one language.
Every single one, without exception, admitted that while being simultaneously fluent in two languages was easily possible in the right circumstances, being truly fluent in three or more simultaneously was far, far more of a stretch.
Sure, they could seem fluent for bursts of 4-5 minutes or so, they would say, and could carry on convos of a certain level all day long, getting better as they went, but that it really was a kind of "use it or lose (some of) it" proposition as to true fluency . . . like muscles.
They ALL said the ability was latent and could be recovered in time, but that if you hadn't been using a language for awhile, it really wasn't all there, in true depth and on the tip of your tongue, from the get go.
Analogy alert: Suppose you were an Olympic swimmer and a professional basketball player, "fluent" in both. Suppose it's off season for the NBA. Sure, you could go dazzle at a local court, but it takes any athlete time to get into game shape. And sure, you could beat all the others at the local pool, but if not in current training, you'd never be at peak form.
Now, add a third sport in there, DrPizza. How simultaneously proficient would you be?
This is what I'm saying, and what other people who spoke multiple languages have told me, in depth, as we discussed that difficulty.