Met my dreamgirl

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

TechBoyJK

Lifer
Oct 17, 2002
16,699
60
91
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
I added a new version of the song. I messed with the eq a bit. It isn't so edgy. It has a much warmer sound.

I listened to the new one. I liked it. Make a CD with similar stuff and I might buy it.

wow, thanks. I'm not in it for the money... I'll just post more as I make em....
 

Goosemaster

Lifer
Apr 10, 2001
48,775
3
81
Sounds good. The guitar solos are waay too messy.

syncopation is one thing, but they are WAAY too messy right now.
 

TechBoyJK

Lifer
Oct 17, 2002
16,699
60
91
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Sounds good. The guitar solos are waay too messy.

syncopation is one thing, but they are WAAY too messy right now.

well, i'll have try harder the next time on a different track, cause I like it. I was more concerened about nailing the melody in my head not nailing every note precisely. The guitar wasn't prewritten. I just jammed to the core track about 9 times and cut out the best of the best......

edit, .... thanks though, I know you have a good ear.....
 

OREOSpeedwagon

Diamond Member
May 30, 2001
8,485
1
81
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
I added a new version of the song. I messed with the eq a bit. It isn't so edgy. It has a much warmer sound.

I listened to the new one. I liked it. Make a CD with similar stuff and I might buy it.

wow, thanks. I'm not in it for the money... I'll just post more as I make em....

It sounds great on my HD497s. I'd definitely buy a CD of similar music if you made one.
 

TechBoyJK

Lifer
Oct 17, 2002
16,699
60
91
Originally posted by: OREOSpeedwagon
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
I added a new version of the song. I messed with the eq a bit. It isn't so edgy. It has a much warmer sound.

I listened to the new one. I liked it. Make a CD with similar stuff and I might buy it.

wow, thanks. I'm not in it for the money... I'll just post more as I make em....

It sounds great on my HD497s. I'd definitely buy a CD of similar music if you made one.

yea, if I im correct, those are pretty expensive right? how is the eq balance? Can you set your receiver's eq to flat and tell me what you think could be adjusted?? I'd really appreciate it....
 

Goosemaster

Lifer
Apr 10, 2001
48,775
3
81
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Sounds good. The guitar solos are waay too messy.

syncopation is one thing, but they are WAAY too messy right now.

well, i'll have try harder the next time on a different track, cause I like it. I was more concerened about nailing the melody in my head not nailing every note precisely. The guitar wasn't prewritten. I just jammed to the core track about 9 times and cut out the best of the best......

edit, .... thanks though, I know you have a good ear.....

The main melody is great though, don't get me wrong....

you just have to work on the improvisation...


Keep up the good work:beer:
 

OREOSpeedwagon

Diamond Member
May 30, 2001
8,485
1
81
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
Originally posted by: OREOSpeedwagon
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
I added a new version of the song. I messed with the eq a bit. It isn't so edgy. It has a much warmer sound.

I listened to the new one. I liked it. Make a CD with similar stuff and I might buy it.

wow, thanks. I'm not in it for the money... I'll just post more as I make em....

It sounds great on my HD497s. I'd definitely buy a CD of similar music if you made one.

yea, if I im correct, those are pretty expensive right? how is the eq balance? Can you set your receiver's eq to flat and tell me what you think could be adjusted?? I'd really appreciate it....

Nah, they're not very expensive (retail is around $50 I think). I don't have them hooked up to a receiver with an EQ right now and don't really know a whole lot about stuff like that, I just know it sounds really good
 

TechBoyJK

Lifer
Oct 17, 2002
16,699
60
91
Originally posted by: OREOSpeedwagon
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
Originally posted by: OREOSpeedwagon
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
I added a new version of the song. I messed with the eq a bit. It isn't so edgy. It has a much warmer sound.

I listened to the new one. I liked it. Make a CD with similar stuff and I might buy it.

wow, thanks. I'm not in it for the money... I'll just post more as I make em....

It sounds great on my HD497s. I'd definitely buy a CD of similar music if you made one.

yea, if I im correct, those are pretty expensive right? how is the eq balance? Can you set your receiver's eq to flat and tell me what you think could be adjusted?? I'd really appreciate it....

Nah, they're not very expensive (retail is around $50 I think). I don't have them hooked up to a receiver with an EQ right now and don't really know a whole lot about stuff like that, I just know it sounds really good

well, thats great cause things sound better on better speakers, and I hate mixing something down on my monitors ($800set) only to play it in my car and realize that there is waaaayyy to much treble or something. Actually, I have focal components, so I usually dont realize how off a mix might be until I play it in a $20 sound box or something....
 

Maximin

Senior member
Jan 23, 2001
651
0
0
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
Well, I met my dreamgirl. Unfortunately, she loves me not.

If you like Santana, 311, Joe Satriani, or Jason Mraz, you will like what she inspired to make. I made a song about my experience.

She Loves Me Not

its short and you can stream via the link, just lick and you'll find your way.


 

thomsbrain

Lifer
Dec 4, 2001
18,148
1
0
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
so, is the mix ok? like is the eq decent? I have good monitors and sometimes my mixes sound great in the monitors, but when they get played on the average stereo, they are too treblely or too bassy.

opinions?

where's the high end? it sounds like you low-passed it at 6K. also, if you compressed the mix (and i'm guessing you did), i'd use longer attack times to retain some of the punch, or else back off the limiter if that's what you used. but overall, the mix itself is well-done.

also, i'm not sure exactly what you were going for artistically regarding all the different guitars sort of coming in and out, but it seems like sometimes there's cool stuff going with guitars that aren't getting enough prominence. (though after listening to the entire song it makes more sense).

i do a lot of layered guitar stuff with my band, and when i have melodies and counter-melodies like you have, i will pan them at least a little left and right to aid seperation, especially on systems that don't sound super great. but you've done a good job using different sounds together to keep everything in its own space.

and i like the song and the guitar playing is tight and well-defined.
 

TechBoyJK

Lifer
Oct 17, 2002
16,699
60
91
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
so, is the mix ok? like is the eq decent? I have good monitors and sometimes my mixes sound great in the monitors, but when they get played on the average stereo, they are too treblely or too bassy.

opinions?

where's the high end? it sounds like you low-passed it at 6K. also, if you compressed the mix (and i'm guessing you did), i'd use longer attack times to retain some of the punch, or else back off the limiter if that's what you used. but overall, the mix itself is well-done.

also, i'm not sure exactly what you were going for artistically regarding all the different guitars sort of coming in and out, but it seems like sometimes there's cool stuff going with guitars that aren't getting enough prominence. (though after listening to the entire song it makes more sense).

i do a lot of layered guitar stuff with my band, and when i have melodies and counter-melodies like you have, i will pan them at least a little left and right to aid seperation, especially on systems that don't sound super great. but you've done a good job using different sounds together to keep everything in its own space.

and i like the song and the guitar playing is tight and well-defined.

its compressed at 128. I scooped out the high end around 12k. Instead of panning I used an effect called surround. I put one guitar in regular mode, the other in surround. Its a pretty effective way to let things share space without panning them out....

thanks for the good words.... I don't want it to sound toooo perfect, so it sounds just rough enough to be real.

 

OREOSpeedwagon

Diamond Member
May 30, 2001
8,485
1
81
TechBoyJK is there anywhere to download the mp3 of this (and other stuff similar to this if you've done any)? the download link in the myspace player doesn't seem to work.
 

thomsbrain

Lifer
Dec 4, 2001
18,148
1
0
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
so, is the mix ok? like is the eq decent? I have good monitors and sometimes my mixes sound great in the monitors, but when they get played on the average stereo, they are too treblely or too bassy.

opinions?

where's the high end? it sounds like you low-passed it at 6K. also, if you compressed the mix (and i'm guessing you did), i'd use longer attack times to retain some of the punch, or else back off the limiter if that's what you used. but overall, the mix itself is well-done.

also, i'm not sure exactly what you were going for artistically regarding all the different guitars sort of coming in and out, but it seems like sometimes there's cool stuff going with guitars that aren't getting enough prominence. (though after listening to the entire song it makes more sense).

i do a lot of layered guitar stuff with my band, and when i have melodies and counter-melodies like you have, i will pan them at least a little left and right to aid seperation, especially on systems that don't sound super great. but you've done a good job using different sounds together to keep everything in its own space.

and i like the song and the guitar playing is tight and well-defined.

its compressed at 128. I scooped out the high end around 12k. Instead of panning I used an effect called surround. I put one guitar in regular mode, the other in surround. Its a pretty effective way to let things share space without panning them out....

thanks for the good words.... I don't want it to sound toooo perfect, so it sounds just rough enough to be real.

i meant dynamic compression, not data compression. i did notice the surround effect. i usually just double the part (play it twice, pan left and right). but anyway, i'd bring the high end back. above 12K is where a lot of the "air" in a mix is, which can help it sound real.
 

TechBoyJK

Lifer
Oct 17, 2002
16,699
60
91
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
so, is the mix ok? like is the eq decent? I have good monitors and sometimes my mixes sound great in the monitors, but when they get played on the average stereo, they are too treblely or too bassy.

opinions?

where's the high end? it sounds like you low-passed it at 6K. also, if you compressed the mix (and i'm guessing you did), i'd use longer attack times to retain some of the punch, or else back off the limiter if that's what you used. but overall, the mix itself is well-done.

also, i'm not sure exactly what you were going for artistically regarding all the different guitars sort of coming in and out, but it seems like sometimes there's cool stuff going with guitars that aren't getting enough prominence. (though after listening to the entire song it makes more sense).

i do a lot of layered guitar stuff with my band, and when i have melodies and counter-melodies like you have, i will pan them at least a little left and right to aid seperation, especially on systems that don't sound super great. but you've done a good job using different sounds together to keep everything in its own space.

and i like the song and the guitar playing is tight and well-defined.

its compressed at 128. I scooped out the high end around 12k. Instead of panning I used an effect called surround. I put one guitar in regular mode, the other in surround. Its a pretty effective way to let things share space without panning them out....

thanks for the good words.... I don't want it to sound toooo perfect, so it sounds just rough enough to be real.

i meant dynamic compression, not data compression. i did notice the surround effect. i usually just double the part (play it twice, pan left and right). but anyway, i'd bring the high end back. above 12K is where a lot of the "air" in a mix is, which can help it sound real.


well, I did compress it like 3db from peak.... and I put a limiter on the whole track to help balance it out. I listened to both, and w/o the compression and limiter, it just seemed to edgy.... i'll take another listen to the master w/o the 12k range scooped out.
 

TechBoyJK

Lifer
Oct 17, 2002
16,699
60
91
Originally posted by: OREOSpeedwagon
TechBoyJK is there anywhere to download the mp3 of this (and other stuff similar to this if you've done any)? the download link in the myspace player doesn't seem to work.


crap, i just checked it. Its spitty an error for me. I think its because I uploaded them so recently....... cause the noondelite track has been up for a few days and it downloads.... I'm just going to wait it out and see if it starts to work eventually.
 

DainBramaged

Lifer
Jun 19, 2003
23,448
40
91
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
hmmm, thats weird..... for this mix, I actually turned up the mids (1500-3000hz) about 2db, and the highs (7500-10K) about 1.5db hmmmmmm any one else think the bass it too heavy??

Sounds really good to me.
 

TechBoyJK

Lifer
Oct 17, 2002
16,699
60
91
Originally posted by: DainBramaged
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
hmmm, thats weird..... for this mix, I actually turned up the mids (1500-3000hz) about 2db, and the highs (7500-10K) about 1.5db hmmmmmm any one else think the bass it too heavy??

Sounds really good to me.

thanks!
 

Netopia

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,793
4
81
METopia? METopia?

Ok... they owe me money! I'm sueing!

(Hey... if MS can try it with Lindows, who knows?)



Joe
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |