- Jan 26, 2000
- 50,879
- 4,266
- 126
http://abc7news.com/politics/michae...amendment-in-collusion-investigation/2022591/
Well there's a shocker.
Well there's a shocker.
Here's another shocker
Here's another shocker
TrumpCriticizesTrump is one of my favorite subreddits these daysIt's almost as if there's a drumpf quote from the past to directly contradict what he or his cronies are currently involved in/doing. What a maroon.
It's too easy for my like. He's been on both sides of literally every issue forcefully and it means nothing to the faithful. They only have to listen to whichever one fits their ideals.TrumpCriticizesTrump is one of my favorite subreddits these days
And it's such bad advice to boot.TrumpCriticizesTrump is one of my favorite subreddits these days
It's too easy for my like. He's been on both sides of literally every issue forcefully and it means nothing to the faithful. They only have to listen to whichever one fits their ideals.
TrumpCriticizesTrump is one of my favorite subreddits these days
They only have to listen to whichever one fits their ideals.
Another anonymous source.
Well there's a shocker.
Is that English?Here's another shocker
No, the teeth are too straight.Is that English?
Another anonymous source.
Well there's a shocker.
It isn't the Fox News way. Fox hires the sources their journalists quote so you know they're fair and balanced sources.did you guys encounter journalism for the first time this year, or something? shocking
you understand there's a distinct difference between anonymous source and disreputable source, right? I'm gonna guess not.Another anonymous source.
Well there's a shocker.
I wonder how globally he will take the fifth. If he answers some questions and not others, it gives us a lot more information to speculate from.
I wonder how globally he will take the fifth. If he answers some questions and not others, it gives us a lot more information to speculate from.
“The context in which the Committee has called for General Flynn’s testimonial production of documents makes it clear that he has more than a reasonable apprehension that any testimony he provides could be used against him,” Flynn’s attorneys wrote in a letter they sent to the committee’s chairman, Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.), and Sen. Mark R. Warner (D-Va.), its top Democrat, on Monday.
The committee issued a subpoena to Flynn for documents this month after he failed to produce records of contacts he had with Russian officials that the committee requested he provide voluntarily.
Flynn is the only witness for whom the committee has issued a subpoena.
Another anonymous source.
Well there's a shocker.
Confirmed: https://www.washingtonpost.com/powe...8_story.html?tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.ea86fc8833e3
His lawyers sent a letter for him. I think Flynn will be the first one to be arrested by the FBI.
Looks like those anonymous sources have proved to be more reliable than your president Dump, yet again.