CZroe
Lifer
- Jun 24, 2001
- 24,195
- 856
- 126
I have no problem with this as an ideal. I note that you begin with agreeing that the injustice mostly has gone one way, and then introduce your own kind of but, when you say "however...." My opinion is that when you demand balance so far into the game, when one side has takes so much damage, you aren't asking for balance at all. You are asking for immunity from the consequences of the racism of the past while we still owe a great debt and millions have not healed. You don't kick people in the balls and then declare time out.
So, racial justice would be allowing the grandchildren of the oppressed to kick their opressor's grandchildren in the balls? Even if you think current generations owe a debt for past injustices, two wrongs don't make a right. Bad analogy.