Microsoft Caught using warez?

Viper GTS

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
38,107
433
136
They're definitely correct about the files containing that information, whether their interpretation is correct will be interesting to see.

Not like there's much MS could do though, I HIGHLY doubt they condone that sort of thing.

Viper GTS
 

Martin

Lifer
Jan 15, 2000
29,178
1
81
I doubt they did those in-house. They probably outsourced to a cheap place got what they paid for.
 

silverpig

Lifer
Jul 29, 2001
27,703
11
81
Yeah I saw this a little while ago too. Pretty funny.

Most likely what happened is it was some dude's job to do up some .wav files and he didn't want to have to wait for a legal purchase so he downloaded and cracked it.
 
Apr 21, 2004
118
0
0
it doesn't matter if it was done internally, outsourced, or whatever. The proof is pretty much infallable imo. One of the most commonly distributed piece of software worldwide, developed by the biggest backer of several anti-piracy organizations, just instantly made some random hacker crack infamous and a reference every IP lawyer will be sure to include in every case from here on. If MS isn't even immune to piracy in their own developement process, then what standard can you hold ...well...ANYone
 

RobCur

Banned
Oct 4, 2002
3,076
0
0
microsoft is the biggest thief since robin hood, steal from the poor and makes them even richer!!!

Their Java sucks, their IE sucks even more. constant crash and their OS are basically trash. even a mac or appleIIe ran better then this~!
 

etalns

Diamond Member
Dec 20, 2001
6,513
1
0
Originally posted by: GiggityGiggity
it doesn't matter if it was done internally, outsourced, or whatever. The proof is pretty much infallable imo. One of the most commonly distributed piece of software worldwide, developed by the biggest backer of several anti-piracy organizations, just instantly made some random hacker crack infamous and a reference every IP lawyer will be sure to include in every case from here on. If MS isn't even immune to piracy in their own developement process, then what standard can you hold ...well...ANYone

For once I agree with an obscurely named forum newbie. You've hit the nail on the head.
 

Yzzim

Lifer
Feb 13, 2000
11,990
1
76
Who would ever open up a wave file that came with windows media player....in notepad no less
 

AnitaPeterson

Diamond Member
Apr 24, 2001
5,962
456
126
I didn't know you can open wave files in Notepad... I guess it's time to try and look at mine, as well...
 

SSP

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
17,727
0
0
Originally posted by: Qosis
Originally posted by: GiggityGiggity
it doesn't matter if it was done internally, outsourced, or whatever. The proof is pretty much infallable imo. One of the most commonly distributed piece of software worldwide, developed by the biggest backer of several anti-piracy organizations, just instantly made some random hacker crack infamous and a reference every IP lawyer will be sure to include in every case from here on. If MS isn't even immune to piracy in their own developement process, then what standard can you hold ...well...ANYone

For once I agree with an obscurely named forum newbie. You've hit the nail on the head.

Do you expect MS to open up every outsourced wave file in note pad to check for warez? If anything, this just proves how ANAL some people are when it comes to going through MS's garbage. Why the hell would anyone open up a wave file to see who the registered user of the program was? :roll:

Yeah I know its not right bla bla, but if this was an outsourced job (most likely since they can buy a zillion copies of sound forge), then anyone who used their service has violated the same laws MS has.
 

etalns

Diamond Member
Dec 20, 2001
6,513
1
0
Originally posted by: SSP
Originally posted by: Qosis
Originally posted by: GiggityGiggity
it doesn't matter if it was done internally, outsourced, or whatever. The proof is pretty much infallable imo. One of the most commonly distributed piece of software worldwide, developed by the biggest backer of several anti-piracy organizations, just instantly made some random hacker crack infamous and a reference every IP lawyer will be sure to include in every case from here on. If MS isn't even immune to piracy in their own developement process, then what standard can you hold ...well...ANYone

For once I agree with an obscurely named forum newbie. You've hit the nail on the head.

Do you expect MS to open up every outsourced wave file in note pad to check for warez? If anything, this just proves how ANAL some people are when it comes to going through MS's garbage. Why the hell would anyone open up a wave file to see who the registered user of the program was? :roll:

Yeah I know its not right bla bla, but if this was an outsourced job (most likely since they can buy a zillion copies of sound forge), then anyone who used their service has violated the same laws MS has.

You act like this doesn't matter. It doesn't matter to you or I, but it does matter in court. If a company which so vehemently opposes piracy has work created using pirated software, it weakens their defense. I don't really care if they did use warez or not, but the legal implications are huge. Read a post, understand what the post says, then reply.

Also, don't assume right off the bat that the job was outsourced.
 

htmlmasterdave

Golden Member
Jul 13, 2001
1,309
0
0
Originally posted by: RobCur
microsoft is the biggest thief since robin hood, steal from the poor and makes them even richer!!!

Their Java sucks, their IE sucks even more. constant crash and their OS are basically trash. even a mac or appleIIe ran better then this~!

Why does everyone hate apple? (OS X is pretty good )

And I think this is huge as well, their stance on piracy is well known, being caught with using warez really doesn't help their image.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |