You keep acting like this is a financial question when it is a moral one. You can't tell me a highly trained medical professional can't make a living without a corporation. You both sound a little condescending but, I don't hold that against you. Moral standards are tough.
I have no idea how you manage to get around with that massive chip on your shoulder.
You have absolutely no idea what it would entail to "go it alone" in medicine, yet you sit there on your high horse and claim it's a moral choice. That's truly absurd. Do you honestly believe you just hang a shingle and people come to see you and that's that?
I wouldn't take a pay cut starting my own practice, I would be massively in the red. How much do you know about health care law, regulations, insurance? It sounds like very little.
The closest thing to what you're describing these days are "concierge" practices where physicians often are in a "cash only" business and live by their own rules. Often times they actually do fairly well for themselves, but do you want to know why? Because the practices tend to have patient panels comprised of healthy wealthy people who can afford such a service. You know who gets left out? The poor and the sick. Moral choice, certainly! I'd rather get paid less and take care of those who others would not, which is exactly what I do now.
Our corporation has a program for the uninsured to provide service at low to no cost. This is utilized fairly frequently by patients in my clinic. These are people who would get 0 care in the "private" world. Are there massive problems with "corporate" medicine? Of course there are, but there are some benefits as well - like spreading out these losses.
Your brazen ignorance is impressive. I guess it's all about you.