zinfamous
No Lifer
- Jul 12, 2006
- 111,095
- 30,041
- 146
I'm going to respond to this again because I have new thoughts today. The more I thought about the move to bring Chapman into the game in the 7th, it just seems it was done not so much to win the series in 7 games, but rather more so to deflect criticism if game 6 were lost. If Chapman blows the game, Maddon always has the excuse that "I put my best guy out there."
Game 5 the Cubs had a 1-run lead and an off day before playing next. Extending Chapman made sense. With a 5-run lead and another critical elimination game tomorrow, different situation entirely. There is a reason why closers are 1-inning pitchers during the regular season and do not pitch in all 162 games.
I don't buy it because at that point, they had a 5 run cushion to at least get out of the 7th, unless they ended up with a 2-on, 1 out situation or whatever. I think Chapman should only be a desperate move at that point in the game, unless Maddon thought that giving him some reps in a more relaxed situation was somehow beneficial to his psyche. I don't know that dude's body or mind and frankly, neither do the rest of us, but it was ~70F at game time last night and I'm wondering if the trainers and Maddon felt that whatever the game conditions and situation were, it was probably a good place to at least bring him out and relax him going into game 7.
Now, the problem I have with my own argument there is that when you bring out Chapman, you expect him to end the game. An expected 2.3 innings with that lead? I don't see the strategy there if they thought it would "relax" him. That's just too many pitches...unless they wanted to get him comfortable with more reps thinking that they may have to go really long with him tonight.
Anyway, crazier things have happened in the world series and the playoffs. You just can't manage each game as if it were a regular season game. This is the last game of the year, and I think all options are on the table. Cubs need to come out patient, yet aggressive at the plate, if that makes any sense: No 1 pitch outs but no 3 or 4 pitch outs, either, against Kluber. I hope we see the first 3 batters take the first 1 or 2 pitches each. At least see what kind of stuff he has before you start swinging. But whether or not you get hits in the first inning, he has to work for those outs.
This game could go either way and I think it will be the best WS game in a very long time. This Indians team has been expertly managed like nothing I've seen before.
Oh, and please move Schwarber to 4th or 5th FFS.