[MMO] World of Tanks

Page 151 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Elcs

Diamond Member
Apr 27, 2002
6,278
6
81
The Matchmaker fails again?





HELL NO!

Good gameplay beats Wolfpacks of single players.
 
Last edited:

eLiu

Diamond Member
Jun 4, 2001
6,407
1
0
The Matchmaker fails again?





HELL NO!

Good gameplay beats Wolfpacks of single players.

Yeah but it's hard to get the team into any semblance of organization. The kind of dumb shit where half the group is held up by 1 peekaboo-ing tank is all too common. Like last night I held an IS-3, Pershing, KV-13, and T-29 back with my M6 on Swamp. They were trying to cross the bridge and I was peeking from behind the rocks. They let the IS-3 lead which meant I only had to peek out far enough to shoot his tracks and side armor.

I actually don't think the M6 is that bad. I mean it's absolutely unbearable if there are T10s in the match but otherwise it's ok as a support tank. The 90mm gun is fantastic. I wish the Shermans could mount it!

I'm still not over my 11535xp game from last night, haha. Man what an epic match.

edit: ooh or once on Erlenberg, 4 of us were trying to cross a bridge being attacked by SU-152. M6 (me), Panther II, and Sherman E8 and Sherman E2. The E8 was in front and as soon as he sees the 152, he STOPS and TURNS his front armor to face it. Ok genius, your paper armor isn't stopping a 152, ever. Worse his angling prevented anyone else from moving forward! The PantherII TK'd that fuckwit and pushes his carcass aside, hahaha

edit2: when I quoted your post, I didn't see the pictures (so I was kinda confused lol). But now, holy fuck! 9 type 59s? I've never seen that many on one team before.
 
Last edited:

Binky

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,046
4
81
Lol, by my count there were 12 Type 59's in that battle. Out of 30 players, that's 40%! Seriously, how can people not say that they aren't currently OP?

They have favorable MM preference (nerf incoming, yay) and they bounce far more often than other tanks. When I'm in my T32 or T34, I shouldn't be more concerned about a 59 than other tier 8's like other T32's, or a Lowe, but I am. They are just very hard to kill when they are facing you. Sure, blast the sides or the back of the turret and they go boom, but how often does somebody show the back of their turret in a 1v1 encounter? Since the patch, I'm also bouncing a lot more off their tracks (not specific to 59's though).

Oh, and they make boatloads of credits too.

The majority of the comments saying that they aren't OP appear to be from people that own one. Does anybody really believe that they are played this much because they are not OP, or is it more likely that they generate credits very well, AND they are very effective (e.g. OP), and therefore more enjoyable to play than the Lowe. There have to be more Lowe's owned by current players than the 59's, but the number of Lowe's in battles is about 20% of the number of 59's.

/rant
 

Visaoni

Senior member
May 15, 2008
213
0
0
Already missing that x5 daily. One more win with it would probably get me out of that miserable A-20.
 

stag3

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2005
3,623
0
76
Just had a game where we split unevenly into two teams. It was me(M4E8) + IS + Tiger + E75 while the other side had the rest of our heavies and mediums. We managed to roll down our side killing a Lowe, E75, 2xT34-85s, Tiger II, Tiger, SU-152, A-20, and an IS. The other side got stuck on the train tracks because a single Type 59 was on the hill shooting at them. I was telling them to get going. And it took until our side cleared out and moved in on their side and shooting the Type 59 from behind before they would leave the safety of the raised rail tracks. All the most vocal coward would say was "Mediums needed to take hill". I responded with "A single Type 59 shouldnt hold up all of you". Just unbelievable.

the best is when i'm trolling in my 704, and i hold of an entire flank cuz nobody wants to take that 800 damage. all tanks can survive a 704 shot. then just kill me. simple.
i definitely am not scared of 704's or ISU152's with the BL10. i take the initial hit, then sidehug them until they die.
 

stag3

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2005
3,623
0
76
w00t

Victory!
Battle: Arctic Region Tuesday, December 27, 2011 3:31:38 PM
Vehicle: VK 4502 (P) Ausf. B
Experience received: 1,890
Credits received: 71,155
Battle Achievements: Master Gunner

from reading the forums i thought i would absolutely HATE this tank. but with the stupid turret placement, it forces you to play smart.
i took on an IS-7, IS-4, T34, and LOWE and survived barely.
they came at me 1 at a time.
 
Last edited:

eLiu

Diamond Member
Jun 4, 2001
6,407
1
0
I swear my Tiger I turns faster & feels more nimble than the upgraded (except for last engine) VK3001P. I thought going from 420->600hp would make this fucker less crappy, but nooo. It's still unbearably slow. How can anyone call this tank a flanker? The 55kph top speed is a joke! Last engine is 670hp so I doubt that'll make a noticeable difference, *sigh*

Stock, this tank was godawful. God. Awful. Now even w/most upgrades (all but last engine) it's STILL bad. Sometimes it reaches up to "meh" levels.

Edit: though somehow my stats are pretty good?? In 30 games I have a 68% win rate. Color me surprised...
 
Last edited:

eLiu

Diamond Member
Jun 4, 2001
6,407
1
0
LOL I just killed an undetected enemy. I was getting set up in my KV on himmelsdorf. I sneezed and clicked: "He's gone!" One-shotted a Stug III. ahahaha awesome luck.
 

PowerYoga

Diamond Member
Nov 6, 2001
4,603
0
0
The tiger and tiger II are very nimble for their weight. I actually relocate far more in my tiger II than I do in any other heavy tanks... it fulfills the sniper position very well.
 

stag3

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2005
3,623
0
76
I swear my Tiger I turns faster & feels more nimble than the upgraded (except for last engine) VK3001P. I thought going from 420->600hp would make this fucker less crappy, but nooo. It's still unbearably slow. How can anyone call this tank a flanker? The 55kph top speed is a joke! Last engine is 670hp so I doubt that'll make a noticeable difference, *sigh*

Stock, this tank was godawful. God. Awful. Now even w/most upgrades (all but last engine) it's STILL bad. Sometimes it reaches up to "meh" levels.

Edit: though somehow my stats are pretty good?? In 30 games I have a 68% win rate. Color me surprised...

3001p is hands down the worst german tank along with the ausf A III thing at tier 3/4 ish.
 

Skott

Diamond Member
Oct 4, 2005
5,730
1
76
3001p is hands down the worst german tank along with the ausf A III thing at tier 3/4 ish.

I sold mine as soon as I got the Tiger P last night. Definitely one of the worse, if not the worse, in the entire game. Haven't hated a tank so much since the Lee. And I had to play the 3001P twice. First time before the tier change back before the E series came in and this last week again so I could get to the Maus side of heavies. Luckily I only had to grind the 41k to get to the Tiger P research done.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Lol, by my count there were 12 Type 59's in that battle. Out of 30 players, that's 40%! Seriously, how can people not say that they aren't currently OP?

They have favorable MM preference (nerf incoming, yay) and they bounce far more often than other tanks. When I'm in my T32 or T34, I shouldn't be more concerned about a 59 than other tier 8's like other T32's, or a Lowe, but I am. They are just very hard to kill when they are facing you. Sure, blast the sides or the back of the turret and they go boom, but how often does somebody show the back of their turret in a 1v1 encounter? Since the patch, I'm also bouncing a lot more off their tracks (not specific to 59's though).

Oh, and they make boatloads of credits too.

The majority of the comments saying that they aren't OP appear to be from people that own one. Does anybody really believe that they are played this much because they are not OP, or is it more likely that they generate credits very well, AND they are very effective (e.g. OP), and therefore more enjoyable to play than the Lowe. There have to be more Lowe's owned by current players than the 59's, but the number of Lowe's in battles is about 20% of the number of 59's.

/rant

The Type 59 was a terrible design decision by the makers of the game. Of all the wallet warrior tanks, this one has a lot going for it. It is bouncy, has a decent gun, very manueverable,and is put into favorable matches. Personally I dont get the decision to include it in the game. The era of the game runs from the mid 30s into the korean war. This tank was mass produced in 1959. Of course it should smoke anything in the game.
 

Maximilian

Lifer
Feb 8, 2004
12,604
15
81
I dont think the type 59 is OP at all, lowes are far more dangerous IMO. Type 59 gun is rubbish and its easy enough to hurt just watch the angles and don't hit the turret.

I know the MM piles them all onto the same team but it does that with every tank usually. If your team is at least semi good they will know to play defensively and wait for the typically suicidal idiot type 59s to come to them and thin out their numbers.
 

PowerYoga

Diamond Member
Nov 6, 2001
4,603
0
0
in 7.2 type 59s get fixed so they have the same MM as every other tier 8 medium. That will hopefully alleviate the whole whining. The whole problem is that they're constantly fighting little tanks and this will fix it so they don't fight PIVs 90% of the time.

the 100mm is terrible at tier 8. Godly at tier 5. Their threat is a non-issue for tier 8 and 9s but they're the most dangerous tanks for a bunch of tier 6s to face off. This thing can rip through low tiers and come out with 100% hp because of its bounciness.
 

Binky

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,046
4
81
In any MMO, the most simple and accurate measure of OP or not OP is generally class/vehicle/whatever played as a percentage of the total population. If one unit is played far more than the others...umm....duh.

It's even worse when that unit costs $30 of real money. If anybody here doesn't think that Type 59's are over-represented, as compared to the other tanks in the game, you are very very bad at math.

Even the credit making part of the equation is mostly meaningless (IMO), since the Lowe is about as good in that respect and it's numbers per game are FAR lower than the 59. I have no actual evidence to back this up (i.e. I'm assuming that the lowe population is greater than or equal to the 59 population).
 

Maximilian

Lifer
Feb 8, 2004
12,604
15
81
In any MMO, the most simple and accurate measure of OP or not OP is generally class/vehicle/whatever played as a percentage of the total population. If one unit is played far more than the others...umm....duh.

It's even worse when that unit costs $30 of real money. If anybody here doesn't think that Type 59's are over-represented, as compared to the other tanks in the game, you are very very bad at math.

Even the credit making part of the equation is mostly meaningless (IMO), since the Lowe is about as good in that respect and it's numbers per game are FAR lower than the 59. I have no actual evidence to back this up (i.e. I'm assuming that the lowe population is greater than or equal to the 59 population).

Lowe and type 59 arent really comparable.

Lowe is a rip off at 12500 gold, type 59 is only 7500.

Some people find the lowe shit boring to play because it is so slow, type 59 is different.

The credit making is pretty much the only reason anyone plays the lowe or type 59, they are the games best credit makers so naturally you will see a lot of them.

Its a shame this hasent been updated: https://spreadsheets.google.com/spr...GFXWmJPT2NPazdqaWloczEtWF9aUWc&hl=en_US&gid=8

It would be interesting to see if the amount of type 59's surpassed lowes or not.
 

Skott

Diamond Member
Oct 4, 2005
5,730
1
76
It will be interesting to see what the next set of gold tanks bring to the game. I don't think the tier changes in p7.2 will change the number of T-59 players. Its a good tank even when grouped into higher tier tank action although I will admit bigger guns will be able to deal with it easier. Assuming you can get the team to organize into a effective defensive team against the T-59 wolf packs. That is the key to beating them. I have seen a team of six T-59s get wasted by a good organized defensive team.
 

Binky

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,046
4
81
Lowe and type 59 arent really comparable.

Lowe is a rip off at 12500 gold, type 59 is only 7500.

Some people find the lowe shit boring to play because it is so slow, type 59 is different.
I'm assuming that the current purchases of Lowe's dropped to crap once the 59 came out - BUT, that doesn't eliminate the large number of Lowes that were already purchased and available for play. I see 500%-1,000% more 59's than lowes in games. If we assume that the population is equal (yeah..no evidence) then there are two possibilities - the lowe is less fun to play and/or the lowe is not as effective as the 59. Being effective in a game makes the game more fun to play. Nobody want to be in that shit tank that isn't useful at all and is a drag on your team (e.g. stock U.S. T34!).

My vote - the lowe is not as effective. I think others are voting the same way, by playing the 59 a LOT more than the Lowe.
 

Skott

Diamond Member
Oct 4, 2005
5,730
1
76
Originally the Lowe was 7500 gold too. It took them a while before they increased the price. I'd say most Lowe players bought it back when it was at the cheaper price.
 
Last edited:

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
I dont think the type 59 is OP at all, lowes are far more dangerous IMO. Type 59 gun is rubbish and its easy enough to hurt just watch the angles and don't hit the turret.

I know the MM piles them all onto the same team but it does that with every tank usually. If your team is at least semi good they will know to play defensively and wait for the typically suicidal idiot type 59s to come to them and thin out their numbers.

In the tiers it gets placed it is deadly. If it were constantly fighting higher tier tanks that had guns that can reliable penetrate them I agree, it isnt that great of a tank. But when they are put up against tier 6 and below good luck. Guns are not reliable against them and they are faster and can hit harder.
 

clok1966

Golden Member
Jul 6, 2004
1,395
13
76
wow we went a few days without Arty is OP comments.. The 59 is BS and the only people who say it inst are the ones useing it or.. have some mental block on seeing waht is actually happening in the game. YES, they can be killed, YES, its not even that dang hard (with the correct tank) but so often they are paired with tanks that cant pentrate the turrent.. and sadly so many players still havent figured out aiming.. as I'm sure most of you who enjoy a tank with his side or butt to you front in one on one battles know. The are so low profile that a even a Avg player can use them fairly effectively with its combo of speed, low profile and HARD turrent.. the avg player will have fits killing it and the avg player can have better then avg success in it. I like ot grip a bit about it myslef (this being a time).. but its in the game, i deal with it. But man im sick of all the arty crying.... I dont like playing arty, and I DONT ever die to it (well almost ever).. the only people who cry are the people who drive the bricks and sit.. If you dont travel in PERFECTLY straight line, if you dont sit and CAMP 24/7.. (shoot and scoot) if you use terrian (this one is so dang important on any map).. you dont die to them.. I have seen so many "good" players in enouhg armour to stop a DERP (exageration) that just sit and snipe (cus they can) and then when arty picks um off they cry a river.. In 95% of all "battle" matchs if a fast tank waits about 60 second, he can go right up the middle of most maps (where arty is deadly, non city maps) and can kill most arty before he dies.. yet nobody does it.. 2-4 arty kills is not good enouhg.. they want to sit safe in some bush till its them againt 4 others and die that way with no kills.

I love the game but its so dam frustrating.. not the game, the people.. sombody said it earlier.. 1 little shitty tank can hold up 3-4 much better tanks cuz they cant figure out they can just kill him and keep moving if they could get by the 'cant get hit' feeling.. the in and out of cover pot shots for 5 minutes 1 vs 4 is a classic reason your team wont win.. I see it all the time and feel like suciding.. no win for sure.. so instead of 5-700 Exp even if i kill 3-4 tanks i will get maybe 200 or so.. I could care less if live or die but I would like to supprt my team and win. its also lovely te see 10 tanks go one way and 2 anotehr.. unless those 10 push really hard and cap.. its an insta loss.. and those 10 wont.. they will sit and gun dule with 3-4 behind cover as there evenly deplyed tanks mop up the other 2 and cap...DOES anybody watch the radar? 4-5 tanks movin in on your base for a cap.. with a single defender .. why does nobody support that guy ever.. they just keep trying to get kills. so sad.
 

Maximilian

Lifer
Feb 8, 2004
12,604
15
81
I'm assuming that the current purchases of Lowe's dropped to crap once the 59 came out - BUT, that doesn't eliminate the large number of Lowes that were already purchased and available for play. I see 500%-1,000% more 59's than lowes in games. If we assume that the population is equal (yeah..no evidence) then there are two possibilities - the lowe is less fun to play and/or the lowe is not as effective as the 59. Being effective in a game makes the game more fun to play. Nobody want to be in that shit tank that isn't useful at all and is a drag on your team (e.g. stock U.S. T34!).

My vote - the lowe is not as effective. I think others are voting the same way, by playing the 59 a LOT more than the Lowe.

I would say the lowe is the better cash maker as damage = credits and the lowe puts out more damage than the type 59. Type 59's gun isnt terrible but it dosent compare to the lowes which can reliably damage higher tiers for even greater credit income.

I think theres more type 59's because people are finding them more fun to play than the lowe. Sitting sniping gets pretty boring after a while. With a type 59 you can rush in and maybe die maybe get a few kills, either way its fun and didnt drain your credits any. I dont own a type 59 but if i want some quick suicidey action ill jump in my panzer II, i imagine a lot of type 59 players have a similar mentality.

In the tiers it gets placed it is deadly. If it were constantly fighting higher tier tanks that had guns that can reliable penetrate them I agree, it isnt that great of a tank. But when they are put up against tier 6 and below good luck. Guns are not reliable against them and they are faster and can hit harder.

Well ive ground through the american heavy tree whilst there were many type 59s and i will be going for the 2nd german heavy tree soon and i haven't had any trouble with the 59's. Im not saying i kill them easily they can be tough nuts to crack and in a tier 6 i obviously cant solo them but in a tier 6 tank you shouldn't be gunning for the 59's, i never do, the other tier 8's on your team should be trying to kill them. Tier 6 tanks would have just as much trouble fighting a KT or IS3.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Well ive ground through the american heavy tree whilst there were many type 59s and i will be going for the 2nd german heavy tree soon and i haven't had any trouble with the 59's. Im not saying i kill them easily they can be tough nuts to crack and in a tier 6 i obviously cant solo them but in a tier 6 tank you shouldn't be gunning for the 59's, i never do, the other tier 8's on your team should be trying to kill them. Tier 6 tanks would have just as much trouble fighting a KT or IS3.

I dont gun for Tpe 59s. The problem is they come after you there isnt much you can do in that tier range except take it in the cheeks. And with the MM placing 3-4 and yes I have seen 7 of them on the opposing team they will find you. At least with an IS3 or KT you can avoid them as they are slow. Type 59s are fast and close in on you. Once that happens nothing you can do except hope help arrives or die bouncing rounds off them.
 

Elcs

Diamond Member
Apr 27, 2002
6,278
6
81
Lowe Vs. Type 59

Type 59 earns more credits (profit) hands down every single day of the week. The Lowe has much higher ammo and repair costs. Even if I run my Type 59 with the 5% Horsepower Oil, I'll run more profit (and exp generally) than I will with my Lowe.

As it stands, if the Lowe is 12,500 gold then Type 59 should be around 20,000 gold.

I don't play my Type 59 because it's OP or because it's more fun than what I have. I play it because it's different (didn't want to go for the Russian meds but enjoy their playstyle) and because it earns me the most credits in the quickest amount of time.

Lowe with Stab, EGLD and Rammer is a great tank which doesn't miss much and pokes holes easily in anything Tier 8 and below, and does a decent job with Tier 9 and 10 with me penetrating the Maus from the front on more than one occasion.

BUT
the Lowe is slow, unwieldy, has weak armour, is very prone to engine damage and engine fires (moreso than any other German Heavy I've played imo) and the ammo costs a bomb. 1k per shell isn't much but factor in the cost of shells to the amount of credits you end up with after a match and you can easily throw 10-15k credits per match out of the window straight away.
 

Skott

Diamond Member
Oct 4, 2005
5,730
1
76
Funny thing is that with my T-59 the best score I had as far as creds go is 94k. Never have gotten to that magical 100k mark yet. Now with my Lowe I can break 100k. I've done it quite a few times since I have had the tank. I think my best is around 120k or so. Their coefficient pay out is the same modifier, as is the KV-5, but their gun damage is different. The Lowe's gun does more dps (damage per shot) than the T-59's. The T-59 has the lower dps but can fire faster. So in theory they probably should work out about the same but you are not always constantly shooting so its not exactly apples to apples. That is gun damage though. Other things come into play when comparing the two tanks. Armor, weak spots, speed, etc., As mentioned above the t-59 gets put into a different line up than the Lowe which greatly helps it so that is another factor.

It won't bother me if they change it's tier line up. Its still a fun tank to play and it will still make good money credit wise(which is the #1 reason I bought it). I wonder if that will make the Lowe more attractive to play in since it can do more damage per shot?

Don't even get me started on arty issues... evil, evil things when playing in a slow big ass tank. LOL
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |