Monsanto GMO corn favorite food for bugs

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Uhhh.. what!? So are we to believe that unless cows are fed a "natural diet" they are "abused"? What is a "natural diet" to you? Any limits on vaccines? What is "treated well" to a cow?
BTW, I've been to "organic" farms where the cows roam free and are drug free, etc, etc... The milk is no different than the milk from the cows from the neighbor's farm. Both were graded the same and from what I could tell, the taste was no different(yes, I happen to love raw milk but haven't drank it in years).

The quality of the food determined by the farm not the actual ingredients produced by the farm? Are you serious?

Wow, some of you people need to get out and live some reality... Yes yes, I know some of you are still in school, just realize that there is much reality out there outside of the academia bubble you love.

I like how he said the small quantities and heirloom strains would have less disease. I got a hearty LOL outta that one which is why I urge him to grow his own.
 

hellod9

Senior member
Sep 16, 2007
249
0
0
Here's what my experience is based on: the amazing 'minimally treated' peaches I've been eating all summer from Hapworth Farms. Or the grass fed milk from Natural by Nature. (The best damn milk I've ever had. Better than most raw milk, in my experience.) Also, the eggs I get are from a farm cooperative. The address of the farm is usually hand-addressed on the egg carton by the farmer. And YES, there is a big difference between farms, even when they are 'pastured hens.'

There was a chicken I roasted, when I first started getting 'good quality' food. Sure, the chicken was more expensive than your 'standard' 99 cent a pound chicken, but the quality difference was stark: The white meat was as rich as the dark meat. Now, that was unexpected. But so wonderful!

Last night I had tiny, bruised, pears from a local farm. They were ugly. But, they tasted really damn good. Just like the lettuce I had a few weeks ago that was so delicious it tasted like butter. That was a weird experience. I never expected lettuce to taste like butter.

I've gotten so used to eating good eggs, that the last time I had 'standard' non-organic eggs, I couldn't finish them. Compared to the standard I'm used to, they were disgusting.

I'm in the unusual situation of being able to get my groceries from a grocery store that sources as much as it can from local, small farms. This has really changed my perspective on farming and food in general. I admit, I'm a bit spoiled to have the quality of food that I get to enjoy. Maybe that's why I wish my taxes would stop paying for large quantities of corn and maybe, just maybe, start supporting small farms that create good quality food.
 

AyashiKaibutsu

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2004
9,306
3
81
Here's what my experience is based on: the amazing 'minimally treated' peaches I've been eating all summer from Hapworth Farms. Or the grass fed milk from Natural by Nature. (The best damn milk I've ever had. Better than most raw milk, in my experience.) Also, the eggs I get are from a farm cooperative. The address of the farm is usually hand-addressed on the egg carton by the farmer. And YES, there is a big difference between farms, even when they are 'pastured hens.'

That has more to do with the care given to raising the food than them being organic.

Unforntunately for your average person that will forever be out of reach due to either the price or distance from cheap sources.
 

hellod9

Senior member
Sep 16, 2007
249
0
0
That has more to do with the care given to raising the food than them being organic.

Unforntunately for your average person that will forever be out of reach due to either the price or distance from cheap sources.

Exactly! "Organic" has long been just another marketing term. The real difference comes from the care given to raising the food. The quality of the farm. I guess I find it really sad that our taxes continually subsidize large industrial farms, instead of small farms that produce this type of food. As Spidey pointed out in an earlier post, large farms that produce industrial quanities of food are more profitable. My dream is that our taxes support farmers that care about their food, instead of corporations that are already profitable.

BTW, these big farms are only going to be profitable as long as they have topsoil to destroy:
http://boingboing.net/2011/05/04/visualizing-iowas-to.html
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Here's what my experience is based on: the amazing 'minimally treated' peaches I've been eating all summer from Hapworth Farms. Or the grass fed milk from Natural by Nature. (The best damn milk I've ever had. Better than most raw milk, in my experience.) Also, the eggs I get are from a farm cooperative. The address of the farm is usually hand-addressed on the egg carton by the farmer. And YES, there is a big difference between farms, even when they are 'pastured hens.'

There was a chicken I roasted, when I first started getting 'good quality' food. Sure, the chicken was more expensive than your 'standard' 99 cent a pound chicken, but the quality difference was stark: The white meat was as rich as the dark meat. Now, that was unexpected. But so wonderful!

Last night I had tiny, bruised, pears from a local farm. They were ugly. But, they tasted really damn good. Just like the lettuce I had a few weeks ago that was so delicious it tasted like butter. That was a weird experience. I never expected lettuce to taste like butter.

I've gotten so used to eating good eggs, that the last time I had 'standard' non-organic eggs, I couldn't finish them. Compared to the standard I'm used to, they were disgusting.

I'm in the unusual situation of being able to get my groceries from a grocery store that sources as much as it can from local, small farms. This has really changed my perspective on farming and food in general. I admit, I'm a bit spoiled to have the quality of food that I get to enjoy. Maybe that's why I wish my taxes would stop paying for large quantities of corn and maybe, just maybe, start supporting small farms that create good quality food.

That's all good and fine but it doesn't really support what you were saying before nor answer the questions I asked in response to your post.

You like grass fed milk. good for you. It's not exactly the best for the cow to only graze(grass fed) but it works and will give a good consistent product if the pasture is maintained.
But anyway... all this hype about "organic" is just that - hype. It's not enough to feed the masses, isn't easily transported long distances, nor is it regulated much. There have been attempts to bring some standards into "organic" but there are many "organic" places that cut just as many corners as people claim the big mass producers do.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Exactly! "Organic" has long been just another marketing term. The real difference comes from the care given to raising the food. The quality of the farm. I guess I find it really sad that our taxes continually subsidize large industrial farms, instead of small farms that produce this type of food. As Spidey pointed out in an earlier post, large farms that produce industrial quanities of food are more profitable. My dream is that our taxes support farmers that care about their food, instead of corporations that are already profitable.

BTW, these big farms are only going to be profitable as long as they have topsoil to destroy:
http://boingboing.net/2011/05/04/visualizing-iowas-to.html

yawn... same old tripe with little fact but a whole lot of emotion.

The FACT is, topsoil has been being lost ever since the glaciers dropped it there. The FACT is farmers have been taking better and better care of their land to prevent erosion, runoff, etc. Keep whining about them "destroying" it though - it makes you look like an out of touch eco-nut that know jack shit about the realities of farming(well... even more than you already come across as)

BTW, if you see my sig - click on the hemp link. Hemp could help with many of the farming issues you raise but... well just read it.
 
Last edited:

ShawnD1

Lifer
May 24, 2003
15,987
2
81
lol @ those who love to hate GMO and/or Monsanto.
It's mostly because Monsanto is an evil company. They're like Rambus but a million times worse.

Article is stupid. Warns farmers that bugs adapt to these new crops? No shit. That's called evolution. Bugs evolve to survive when their conditions changed. That has been going on for billions of years.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Well said! Lets start trading insults. K?

Stop with the BS and there won't be any reason to call you out like that. There are better ways to go about this discussion but to claim the BIG farms are "destroying" something and others aren't means you have no clue and have likely been indoctrinated to parrot the eco-kook BS. I know big farmers, I know small farmers - the operations aren't much different other than scale and efficiency.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Thanks for the continued insults. I appreciate it.

Hellod9, you've got the right idea. Local farms are great and they produce good food mainly because it doesn't have to be shipped so far. I've got a local guy up the street I get veggies from and my grocery does it's best to use local produce (hey, less shipping, better quality, etc).

But I also grow a lot of my veggies so understand what it takes to keep them happy and bug/disease free (there are many veggies you simply MUST use pesticides on, any of the entire cabbage family for example). My own get TLC that can only be done in a home garden and therefore my stuff really is the best over all. You simply can't put that much attention on any production kind of scale even for a local farmer trying to supply his product. There's a HUGE difference between caring for 100 plants vs 10s acres of a small farm.

Small and local doesn't mean better, it just means small and local and frequently higher priced. It really does sound like you've bought into the propaganda without any real knowledge. Many folks that insist on local goods suffer from "it costs more, so it must taste better" placebo effect.

It does help that I can go 5 minutes from my house and see row after huge rows of corn and tobacco though. Remember, corn isn't just for corn syrup, the bulk of it is for feed.
 
Last edited:

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
And if this corn was producing BT, then that is pretty fucking awesome. I use that on all my cabbage family for worms, works great, interrupts their lifecycle. Maters as well.
 
May 11, 2008
20,058
1,291
126
Stop with the BS and there won't be any reason to call you out like that. There are better ways to go about this discussion but to claim the BIG farms are "destroying" something and others aren't means you have no clue and have likely been indoctrinated to parrot the eco-kook BS. I know big farmers, I know small farmers - the operations aren't much different other than scale and efficiency.

Unfortunately for you, hellod9 is right.

It is all about efficiency. When you look at it from a larger perspective, what hellod9 is writing, is exactly what the US economy need. I have seen the effects of enlarging scales in agriculture and stock breeding in other countries. It does not work. In time the food does degrade when thinking of quality. And the prices rise again.

Intermezzo :
only decades later people starting to understand the link between the food they have been consuming for decades and diseases. I know a lot of psychologists need to make money and invent diseases that do not exist. I also know a lot of auto immune diseases seem to pop up more and more. It is environment related( and this also mean the food you consume). And you will not notice it until your offspring or the offspring of your offspring. Epi-genetics. It is real. The human body is influenced by the trillions of bacteria that live in us and on our skin.
End intermezzo :

The best way for the US economy and for the US mentality to change and US citizens to become united again is to let people work on the land themselves. There will be the same amount of food to eat. There will be less to waste away and there will be less to over consume. This will force a different mentality for the people, but in the end, the US will emerge stronger from it if. That is if these policies would be taken. You have to understand, that a lot of people already are receiving support through social pay or food stamps. Let them work for it. As that they not get bored or depressed but feel they are still contributing to society, with as result lowering the amount of misconducts and crime. Small scale local agriculture is exactly what you need. Greenhouse technologies are prevalent to solve local weather issues.

When the mentality is just and united, people can solve any problem. The strength is diversity. Not just biologically. But also when it comes of putting the minds of several people together to come up with solutions. It is nature, it is a hidden means of your god if you choose it to be. Greed will only cause suffering. Altruism and working together is the solution.


If you do not, the US will go down in history exactly the same way as ancient Rome did. Look at the dark ages of Europe what was inevitably the result of the collapse which happened because of corruption, because of greed, because of vanity, because of ignorance and arrogance !



As a side note.
If the US wants to survive, then invest in new technologies that improve overall efficiency and quality of human life. That means turning into an electric nation and stop being an oil nation. If you stick with oil, you will perish. Right now, it is all about consumption and entertainment where investor see money. This must be changed. The US can make it happen only if views are regained similar as Frederick Terman. Let the government work together with investors to invest in new technologies discovered by young students and their groups. Universities is where the money always have been found. Nowhere else.
 
Last edited:

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Unfortunately for you, hellod9 is right.

It is all about efficiency. When you look at it from a larger perspective, what hellod9 is writing, is exactly what the US economy need. I have seen the effects of enlarging scales in agriculture and stock breeding in other countries. It does not work. In time the food does degrade when thinking of quality. And the prices rise again.

Intermezzo :
only decades later people starting to understand the link between the food they have been consuming for decades and diseases. I know a lot of psychologists need to make money and invent diseases that do not exist. I also know a lot of auto immune diseases seem to pop up more and more. It is environment related( and this also mean the food you consume). And you will not notice it until your offspring or the offspring of your offspring. Epi-genetics. It is real. The human body is influenced by the trillions of bacteria that live in us and on our skin.
End intermezzo :

The best way for the US economy and for the US mentality to change and US citizens to become united again is to let people work on the land themselves. There will be the same amount of food to eat. There will be less to waste away and there will be less to over consume. This will force a different mentality for the people, but in the end, the US will emerge stronger from it if. That is if these policies would be taken. You have to understand, that a lot of people already are receiving support through social pay or food stamps. Let them work for it. As that they not get bored or depressed but feel they are still contributing to society, with as result lowering the amount of misconducts and crime. Small scale local agriculture is exactly what you need. Greenhouse technologies are prevalent to solve local weather issues.

When the mentality is just and united, people can solve any problem. The strength is diversity. Not just biologically. But also when it comes of putting the minds of several people together to come up with solutions. It is nature, it is a hidden means of your god if you choose it to be. Greed will only cause suffering. Altruism and working together is the solution.


If you do not, the US will go down in history exactly the same way as ancient Rome did. Look at the dark ages of Europe what was inevitably the result of the collapse which happened because of corruption, because of greed, because of vanity, because of ignorance and arrogance !



As a side note.
If the US wants to survive, then invest in new technologies that improve overall efficiency and quality of human life. That means turning into an electric nation and stop being an oil nation. If you stick with oil, you will perish. Right now, it is all about consumption and entertainment where investor see money. This must be changed. The US can make it happen only if views are regained similar as Frederick Terman. Let the government work together with investors to invest in new technologies discovered by young students and their groups. Universities is where the money always have been found. Nowhere else.

This is the mind of the liberal. Look, this how what they truly believe. It's disgusting. Normally they try to hide it, but in this post it's on full display, the mind of a liberal.
 

sm625

Diamond Member
May 6, 2011
8,172
137
106
Binary crop rotation is almost useless. You're supposed to rotate 5 different crops with a 6th year off.
 

HendrixFan

Diamond Member
Oct 18, 2001
4,648
0
71
But anyway... all this hype about "organic" is just that - hype. It's not enough to feed the masses, isn't easily transported long distances, nor is it regulated much. There have been attempts to bring some standards into "organic" but there are many "organic" places that cut just as many corners as people claim the big mass producers do.

That simply isn't true, the USDA sets a standard for organic foods. Here in Texas this past winter, the extreme cold we had impacted organic and "cage free" farms moreso than farms where animals were pinned up and unable to walk due to overcrowding. The result was a huge shortage of organic milk, cage free eggs, organic eggs (always cage free), and organic yogurts (made from said organic milk). Retailers in Texas were reaching up as far as Kansas for supply, and typically we stay Texas only as a selling point. Because of the shortage the prices spiked on the seller's market and much of the organics were sold at break even, or at a loss, if retailers were even able to get it in.

The market couldn't step up and provide new organic farms to meet demand right away. Part of the USDA certification for organic is a 7 year process to ensure that everything that goes into the farm (feed, animals, etc) are all organic. The rising demand for organic food won't be met with better supply for years, unless it turns out to be just some sort of fad.

Whatever corners are cut in the organic process have to be minimal in order to maintain the strict certification.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Unfortunately for you, hellod9 is right.

It is all about efficiency. When you look at it from a larger perspective, what hellod9 is writing, is exactly what the US economy need. I have seen the effects of enlarging scales in agriculture and stock breeding in other countries. It does not work. In time the food does degrade when thinking of quality. And the prices rise again.

Nothing you posted supports your contention that hellod9 is right.
Having and using local supplies is fine and useful but it doesn't mean it's better or that anything but local is evil or "destroying" things.
 

HendrixFan

Diamond Member
Oct 18, 2001
4,648
0
71
This is the mind of the liberal. Look, this how what they truly believe. It's disgusting. Normally they try to hide it, but in this post it's on full display, the mind of a liberal.

His post is essentially "you can't beat nature". The core of what he says is certainly true.

Your posts in here show a much more disturbed mind, not limited to, but including dismissing the excessive corn farming as "the bulk of it is for feed". When you take any animal and feed it something that was not part of its diet through the course of its existence, and make it their primary, if not sole source of food you will run into problems.

Not only is corn in everything we eat (unless you spend tons of time reading labels and paying more), from corn syrup as a sweetener to corn starch and other corn fillers, but even when we eat beef or chicken it is corn based because of "feed". Have you ever seen corn come through on the other side? Our bodies don't digest it properly, it just passes through. Corn itself has very little nutrients and there are many many other vegetables that should be eaten in its place.

Part of the expansion of corn in our food is because if its rare "useless" nutritional quality. You eat the food but it doesn't fill you up. So you eat more.

Do we know the extent of the problems created by making a corn centric food ecosystem? Probably not yet. But what we do know isn't good.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
That simply isn't true, the USDA sets a standard for organic foods. Here in Texas this past winter, the extreme cold we had impacted organic and "cage free" farms moreso than farms where animals were pinned up and unable to walk due to overcrowding. The result was a huge shortage of organic milk, cage free eggs, organic eggs (always cage free), and organic yogurts (made from said organic milk). Retailers in Texas were reaching up as far as Kansas for supply, and typically we stay Texas only as a selling point. Because of the shortage the prices spiked on the seller's market and much of the organics were sold at break even, or at a loss, if retailers were even able to get it in.

The market couldn't step up and provide new organic farms to meet demand right away. Part of the USDA certification for organic is a 7 year process to ensure that everything that goes into the farm (feed, animals, etc) are all organic. The rising demand for organic food won't be met with better supply for years, unless it turns out to be just some sort of fad.

Whatever corners are cut in the organic process have to be minimal in order to maintain the strict certification.

Ah yes, the claims of the USDA standards. Have you looked into them? Have you actually looked at what is still allowed to be considered organic? There are many groups working on setting and policing the "organic" industry and getting it all written into law. However the very fact these groups exist is because "organic" doesn't necessarily mean "organic". Unless your state has actually passed some recent laws on "organic" labels then there is no "strict certification". I'm not up on what Texas may have done recently but if they actually do have strict certifications and policing of the "organic" label then kudos to them.
 

airdata

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2010
4,987
0
0
It sucks that you have to be wealthy in order to completely avoid GMO foods.

If I went and bought groceries @ whole foods, I'd have to make twice what I make now just to pay for groceries.
 
May 11, 2008
20,058
1,291
126
This is the mind of the liberal. Look, this how what they truly believe. It's disgusting. Normally they try to hide it, but in this post it's on full display, the mind of a liberal.

As usual you are only able to spout vile. Come back with alternative solutions that triumph the solutions and explanations i came up with. Then you are becoming useful for once.
 

HendrixFan

Diamond Member
Oct 18, 2001
4,648
0
71
Ah yes, the claims of the USDA standards. Have you looked into them? Have you actually looked at what is still allowed to be considered organic? There are many groups working on setting and policing the "organic" industry and getting it all written into law. However the very fact these groups exist is because "organic" doesn't necessarily mean "organic". Unless your state has actually passed some recent laws on "organic" labels then there is no "strict certification". I'm not up on what Texas may have done recently but if they actually do have strict certifications and policing of the "organic" label then kudos to them.

A 7 year minimum of chemical free fertilizer, no insecticides or herbicides, no antibiotics or hormones, and organic feed (also meets the 7 year requirement). The policing is done mostly on the end of the retailers (Whole Foods, Central Market, etc) as they are keen to keep their high dollar organic selection up to snuff.

What do you consider organic that these requirements fail to meet?
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
As usual you are only able to spout vile. Come back with alternative solutions that triumph the solutions and explanations i came up with. Then you are becoming useful for once.

You're point of view, the mind of a liberal, is that we have a dire food problem in the US. That is false and as such needs no "solution".

Now go back to watching your food,inc propoganda and wishing we lived in rock caves eating organic mud.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |