- Mar 10, 2002
- 1,995
- 0
- 0
I'm a contract administrator for a small enterprise HW/SW reseller. I currently manage a multi-million dollar contract with one of the largest companies in the country to provide maintenance on their enterprise hardware.
At the onset of the contract, the owners of our company and our customer agreed that we would issue credits pursuant to the contract exactly as we received them from our supply chain, meaning we would keep our original margin on those moneys and would return our cost.
So far this year, we've removed around $600k (our cost) worth of services from the contract, and they should be receiving that amount in whole. When the owners of our company noticed how much money was being transferred, they asked me to facilitate an additional "cut" of 17.5%, or around $100k.
Based on the verbiage of the contract alone this "cut" is illegal, and I feel that I could be made an accessory if we were to ever be audited.
I'm considering telling our management that I don't want to be a part of it, but I'm fairly certain I'll end up getting fired, and the money will end up in our owners' pockets either way.
Opinions?
EDIT: I should mention that the amount of money our customer is expecting is based on earlier "estimates," which one of the owners had me low ball to begin with. We basically found that we would be getting much more, and that we could take the 17.5% cut without them ever knowing (unless they decided to audit the contract, of course).
At the onset of the contract, the owners of our company and our customer agreed that we would issue credits pursuant to the contract exactly as we received them from our supply chain, meaning we would keep our original margin on those moneys and would return our cost.
So far this year, we've removed around $600k (our cost) worth of services from the contract, and they should be receiving that amount in whole. When the owners of our company noticed how much money was being transferred, they asked me to facilitate an additional "cut" of 17.5%, or around $100k.
Based on the verbiage of the contract alone this "cut" is illegal, and I feel that I could be made an accessory if we were to ever be audited.
I'm considering telling our management that I don't want to be a part of it, but I'm fairly certain I'll end up getting fired, and the money will end up in our owners' pockets either way.
Opinions?
EDIT: I should mention that the amount of money our customer is expecting is based on earlier "estimates," which one of the owners had me low ball to begin with. We basically found that we would be getting much more, and that we could take the 17.5% cut without them ever knowing (unless they decided to audit the contract, of course).