More Llano leaks (A8 APU extensively benchmarked)

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Gigantopithecus

Diamond Member
Dec 14, 2004
7,665
0
71
Don't mind him. He's always bashing AMD and praising Intel. This is the same person whose Pentium 4 "destroyed" any Athlon 64s in benchmarks.

This. Nemesis 1 is this forum's double-digit IQ drunk relative. No one's going to throw him out of the family function, but no one listens to his bullshit non-sense either.



1. No profanity in the tech forums.

2. No insults or personal attacks.

Please familiarize yourself with the following portions of the AnandTech Forum Guidelines:
1) No trolling, flaming or personally attacking members. Deftly attacking ideas and backing up arguments with facts is acceptable and encouraged. Attacking other members personally and purposefully causing trouble with no motive other than to upset the crowd is not allowed.
We want to give all our members as much freedom as possible while maintaining an environment that encourages productive discussion. It is our desire to encourage our members to share their knowledge and experiences in order to benefit the rest of the community, while also providing a place for people to come and just hang out.

We also intend to encourage respect and responsibility among members in order to maintain order and civility. Our social forums will have a relaxed atmosphere, but other forums will be expected to remain on-topic and posts should be helpful, relevant and professional.

We ask for respect and common decency towards your fellow forum members.
Idontcare
Super Mod
 
Last edited by a moderator:

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
Well, based on recent leaks.. It is within ~3% of phenom II

So it will continue to get smacked-around in performance by a SB-mobile system? The GPU will be 'less crappy' though, that is good. Gaming on either Intel or Llano will still be pretty poor. Give us another a year or two, and some solid advances, and these IGPs will be on-par with consoles, so that's a plus.

I know it sounds good, but you still are much better dropping $100 on a GPU to play even WoW. You can afford the monthly charge for WoW, why not pay a little and have the experience much better and look decent? These IGPs will get pretty slow in demanding areas...
 

Gigantopithecus

Diamond Member
Dec 14, 2004
7,665
0
71
You can afford the monthly charge for WoW, why not pay a little and have the experience much better and look decent?

Because you're playing on a 1333x768 monitor that isn't particularly demanding to push a good framerate on. Or, you're like the people I know who play WoW: non-enthusiasts. Of course my friends and acquaintances aren't a huge sample size, but none of them give a shit about graphics quality as long as it works and it doesn't slow down too much. Hell, two of my friends play WoW on a Radeon HD 4250 despite my offers to get them cards like 5570s for dirt cheap.
 

Vesku

Diamond Member
Aug 25, 2005
3,743
28
86
Even if it was closer to Athlon II than Phenom II, this is going to really up the cpu/gpu balance for low-mid range notebooks. Lowest SKU Llano has at least 4 times the shaders of the AMD 4250 IGP? Only thing that makes me a bit *meh* on this change is that this will not help the anti-flash crusade if it doesn't bog down the low end computers anymore. :S
 

podspi

Golden Member
Jan 11, 2011
1,982
102
106
So it will continue to get smacked-around in performance by a SB-mobile system? The GPU will be 'less crappy' though, that is good. Gaming on either Intel or Llano will still be pretty poor. Give us another a year or two, and some solid advances, and these IGPs will be on-par with consoles, so that's a plus.

I know it sounds good, but you still are much better dropping $100 on a GPU to play even WoW. You can afford the monthly charge for WoW, why not pay a little and have the experience much better and look decent? These IGPs will get pretty slow in demanding areas...


It's Stars at the core (I crack myself up) so yea, CPU performance will be nothing to write home about. But the beauty of Llano is that for most people that really no longer matters. The best part of all of this is that if you want to drop $100 on a GPU, as long as it is an AMD GPU you can hybrid crossfire it and get much better performance.


It will be interesting though. 2.6ghz Stars core really isn't enough to play SCII smoothly if the unit counts get too high, though. Honestly 1.9ghz ~ 2.6ghz is flirting with "fast enough" performance, especially when it comes to gaming.
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0


Can anyone understand this gibberish?

It wasn't meant for you only the person quoted . He asked me a question I replied NO YOU didn't . The rest was about hype . Its easy enough to go get the AT prerelease mini preview on bobcat or zacata if you preferr. When real world reviews were done the hype in the preview was debunked. This was when people were comparring zacata to SB .
 
Last edited:

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
There's really only one person who jumps in every AMD thread and tries to discredit their products before they are released...

Really! who would that be? I really haven't seen this person jump into review threads of real products out on the Market . I do see this person argueing against the OVER HYPE.

I RENEMBER THE INTEL RELEASE OF C2D and the very early bench marks and the hype against it in this forum . Saying intel was lieing this that and the other. You guys play real fair. NOT! DO a forum search on the subject of early intel c2d benchmarks and than look in mirror. Remove the log from of your own eye befor tring to remove a splinter from anothers
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
I imagine there'll be plenty of information that goes up at midnight. Hopefully Anand has put together a nice article. I've always enjoyed reading his pieces whenever a new architecture, etc. comes out.

Ya i suspect he will do a fine job , I am sure his praise will be high for the GPU part of the review. Not so good for the CPU part however. It will make a good product for AMD . Mobile should do well for them with people who buy notebooks to game on .
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
This. Nemesis 1 is this forum's double-digit IQ drunk relative. No one's going to throw him out of the family function, but no one listens to his bullshit non-sense either.


Hay I don't mind ya picking on me fact is I like it . But stop the insults I suspect my IQ is alot higher than yours . NOT a little . A lot!
 

pantsaregood

Senior member
Feb 13, 2011
993
37
91
Really! who would that be? I really haven't seen this person jump into review threads of real products out on the Market . I do see this person argueing against the OVER HYPE.

I RENEMBER THE INTEL RELEASE OF C2D and the very early bench marks and the hype against it in this forum . Saying intel was lieing this that and the other. You guys play real fair. NOT! DO a forum search on the subject of early intel c2d benchmarks and than look in mirror. Remove the log from of your own eye befor tring to remove a splinter from anothers

The 90s called. They want their catchphrase back.

No one cares about Llano's CPU performance, as we know exactly how it will perform. A combination of a "mainstream" CPU with a "mainstream" GPU for <$100 is something that anyone interested in games will into It also gives OEMs the ability to sell PCs with ridiculous taglines such as "gaming essentials on a budget."

Sandy Bridge makes Llano look like garbage as far as CPU performance goes. No one is denying that.
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,453
10,120
126
Because you're playing on a 1333x768 monitor that isn't particularly demanding to push a good framerate on. Or, you're like the people I know who play WoW: non-enthusiasts. Of course my friends and acquaintances aren't a huge sample size, but none of them give a shit about graphics quality as long as it works and it doesn't slow down too much. Hell, two of my friends play WoW on a Radeon HD 4250 despite my offers to get them cards like 5570s for dirt cheap.

I tried WoW on a 6150(SE?) NV onboard chipset, at 1680x1050, and it was downright awful.
 
Last edited:

Terzo

Platinum Member
Dec 13, 2005
2,589
27
91
From the Wall Street Journal...

(note the Anandtech reference)

AMD Tries to Close Gap in Chip Power Usage With Intel

By DON CLARK

Advanced Micro Devices Inc. may have at least temporarily thrown off a big burden in its struggle with Intel Corp., a longtime gap in power consumption between AMD chips and those of its larger rival.



AMD on Tuesday is unveiling its second product line that combines two once-separate classes of chip technology, this time targeting notebook PCs at mainstream price points. The new chips include graphics circuitry—good for chores like playing games and high-definition-movies—along with the microprocessor circuitry AMD has long offered for handling other computing chores.


Besides boosting performance, AMD says laptops using its new A-Series chips can run 3.5 hours more on a single charge than those using its prior technology.


"I think we're really going to surprise the industry with how much we've improved the battery life," Rick Bergman, senior vice president and general manager of AMD's products group.


AMD says the maximum battery life using the new chips now stands at up to 10.5 hours—measured when a computer is switched on but idle—and said they top comparable Intel products. AnandTech, a website that tests high-tech products, also found that the new AMD chips beat or matched Intel chips in some power-consumption tests that simulate typical usage, though Intel came out ahead in some tests, said Jarred Walton, a senior mobile editor for the site.


AMD still faces an uphill effort. The Sunnyvale, Calif., firm's chips accounted for just 13.2% of world-wide shipments of chips for portable PCs in the first quarter, compared with 86.5% for Intel, according to market tracker Mercury Research.


The AMD chips emulate power-saving techniques already adopted by Intel, and are the first by AMD to adopt a comparable production process after delays by manufacturing partner Globalfoundries. Some analysts believe Intel could regain a power-consumption edge next year with its next manufacturing process, which exploits a major shift in transistor design. AMD also has reported no progress in finding a permanent chief executive to succeed Dirk Meyer, who was forced out in January; that process was expected to take four to six months.


Both Intel and AMD, moreover, have yet to match the power-sipping chip designs of ARM Holdings PLC to play a major role in the fast-moving market for tablet-style computers. Still, AMD's new chips provide some evidence that its 2006 purchase of graphics specialist ATI Technologies is paying dividends.


AMD estimates say the A-Series chips, part of an effort it calls Fusion, will be used in more than 150 notebook PCs being designed by computer makers. Hewlett-Packard Co., for example, on Tuesday is expected to announce 11 portables with the technology, at starting prices ranging from $449 to $699.


"You are finally starting to see the benefits from the acquisition of years ago coming together," says Phil McKinney, vice president and chief technology officer for H-P's personal systems group. AMD has "a potential to carve out an interesting segment for themselves."


Intel earlier this year introduced its second-generation Core chip line—known by the code-name Sandy Bridge—that also built in graphics technology. "It's easy to make theoretical battery life claims," an Intel spokesman said in response to AMD's announcement. He added there are a "multitude" of laptops using the new Core technology that "deliver both great total performance and great battery life."


Nathan Brookwood, an analyst at the market-research firm Insight 64, said the two companies are likely to be able to point to different kinds of computing jobs where their chips are the fastest. Since AMD's performance on graphics is stronger, he said, the company needs to get developers to create programs that exploit those features.


So AMD this week is hosting an event for software developers in Bellevue, Wash., whose speakers are expected to include developers from Microsoft Corp. and ARM.
It's nice to hear AMD will be competitive in battery life, though how competitive remains to be seen. Why can Ananadtech tell Wall Street Journal but not us?
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,095
513
126
Competitive with what though? If they finally match Intel on battery life, or at least trade blows but at much lower performance whooopie do. Should be interesting to see what Anandtech shows.
 

Fox5

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
5,957
7
81
So it will continue to get smacked-around in performance by a SB-mobile system? The GPU will be 'less crappy' though, that is good. Gaming on either Intel or Llano will still be pretty poor. Give us another a year or two, and some solid advances, and these IGPs will be on-par with consoles, so that's a plus.

I know it sounds good, but you still are much better dropping $100 on a GPU to play even WoW. You can afford the monthly charge for WoW, why not pay a little and have the experience much better and look decent? These IGPs will get pretty slow in demanding areas...

In terms of processing power (but not memory bandwidth) llano beats the consoles. The 360 has 48 shaders, multiplied by 5 (since they're SIMD) for 240. Llano has 400 'shaders', which equates to either 80 or 100 SIMD shaders depending on architecture.
The ps3 gpu may fair even worse, 24 pixel shaders + 8 vertex shaders, although it sounds like the RSX had SIMD shaders as well, despite not being unified shaders.

There was a rumor that Llano '2' could make it into a console. Given that Nintendo's in the graphical ballpark of what I'd expect from a Llano 2 with the Wii U (if 4770-4870 gpu rumors are true), that seems like a stretch unless AMD can at least quadruple performance over Llano by then.
 

LOL_Wut_Axel

Diamond Member
Mar 26, 2011
4,310
8
81
What does DDR3-1600/DDR3L-1333 mean? What is the "L" for?

Low-voltage RAM. It typically runs at either 1.35V or 1.25V.

Competitive with what though? If they finally match Intel on battery life, or at least trade blows but at much lower performance whooopie do. Should be interesting to see what Anandtech shows.

It's pretty obvious, but if you haven't noticed, this competes with the Mobile Core i3 and the Core i5. It should be slower in single-threaded applications, but it should match them in multi-threaded ones because of 4 actual cores. Basically, this should deliver CPU performance comparable to the Mobile Core 2 Quads combined with GPU performance comparable to the Radeon HD 5570 or a bit higher. This translates to GPU performance that is 3-4x higher than the Intel HD 3000 and CPU performance that should be overall some 15-20&#37; lower.
 

Gigantopithecus

Diamond Member
Dec 14, 2004
7,665
0
71
It's pretty obvious, but if you haven't noticed, this competes with the Mobile Core i3 and the Core i5. It should be slower in single-threaded applications, but it should match them in multi-threaded ones because of 4 actual cores. Basically, this should deliver CPU performance comparable to the Mobile Core 2 Quads combined with GPU performance comparable to the Radeon HD 5570 or a bit higher. This translates to GPU performance that is 3-4x higher than the Intel HD 3000 and CPU performance that should be overall some 15-20&#37; lower.

And since the GPU is a much weaker link than the CPU in mobile computing, 3-4x on the graphics while sacrificing 20% on the central processor - and likely getting equal or better battery life - this is why this platform is going to be a hit. Hell, stores are still having trouble keeping the better Zacate notebooks in stock. I wouldn't be surprised if Llano notebooks are a bit harder to find as well as come back to school time.
 

Kevmanw430

Senior member
Mar 11, 2011
279
0
76
So, reading the article, we find what we expected. The CPU is much slower, but the IGP kicks intel to the curb. It gets even better with Xfire. They also only used a 6630M, when 6770M's may be used. I think an HP DV6 w/IGP Xfired w/a 6770M or 6750M would be VERY good for gaming, even at 1080p in some games, and definitely at 1366x768.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |