- Mar 9, 2005
- 16,048
- 4,807
- 136
Things are heating up at GA Tech.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/18/us/georgia-tech-protest-slain-student/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/18/us/georgia-tech-protest-slain-student/index.html
They shouldn't be.Things are heating up at GA Tech.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/18/us/georgia-tech-protest-slain-student/index.html
- Police are trained that they could die at any second, from flick of a wrist to pull a gun or knife on them. Their training involves videos of when such events have occurred in the past. It is beat into their heads that death is coming for them.
- 21 foot rule.
- If they lose control of a physical altercation, they are trained that their gun is at risk. Makes them treat any contact as a life or death struggle. They are required to gain control, to use any threat or use of force to gain control.
- They are trained to pursue if someone flees, again, as part of maintaining control but in that case to protect third parties. To prevent their suspect from interacting with or harming anyone else.
This is what we have. Not perfect, but better than nothing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Investigations_Unit
That is not something I would mind, so long as it would not be accountable to the same higher-ups that the police report to. In theory, this is something that the FBI could easily do.
These brain dead retards are seriously protesting the shooting of Schultz and claiming more needs to be done to "protect LGBTQ?"
What the actual fuck is wrong with these people? This was obviously suicide by cop and has NOTHING to do with the person's gender identity or sexual orientation.
FBI agents are federal cops, having cops investigate other cops is just not viable.
SIU reports to AG, but it is fully independent.
That does not make sense. FBI are federal agents, but they are for investigations. Cops also have investigators so if you are saying the FBI agents are cops, then all investigators are cops even the SIU. Further, here in the US the AG is the top of law enforcement so again it would be a "cop" by definition.
FBI agents are not really cops.
Do cops when they confront folks on a bridge trying to commit suicide oblige them and push them over? We need to change our culture so that the gun is not the solution to every difficult situation. Maybe get over ourselves and our arrogance and learn a little from other countries who don't have this problem.
They enforce federal laws, how are they not cops? You have local, state and federal police officers. We have the same.
Then by that standard, your AG also is a cop no?
AG generally speaking do not go out and arrest people. But they tend to be known as the jurisdiction's top cop, whatever the jurisdiction is.
Your AG wears many hats, but by your definition, the AG is a cop. So...?
Sigh, SIU has to report to someone. They are by definition not police officers. But they do report to AG in an arms length manner.
So by definition the FBI is not police. The investigate and arrest, but so does the SIU from what I can tell. If your worry is cops investigating cops then it appears you have some work to do at home.
Whatever floats your boat.
Whatever happened to the cop that shot the unarmed australian woman justine damond? She called the cops to report a potential crime and when they arrived one of them shot her through the closed door of the police car. Did the cop get prosecuted for that? If that happened in australia he would be strung up by his balls.
I remember the cops defending him too. Is it standard operating procedure for cops in the US to execute unarmed civilians?
Like a judge dredd kind of thing? It just seems odd that a cop can shoot an unarmed woman through a car door and then have the full support of the police department as if he hasn't done anything wrong. I have read that she had a phone in her hand. I wonder....and this is just a theory I am working on... if the ready availability of high powered firearms in the US forces the police to just assume everyone is armed. So suddenly a phone becomes a gun.
And the woman dressed in her pajamas in a well lit laneway in an affluent neighbourhood is a mortal danger. Or maybe the guy was just poorly trained and for the cops in the US their go to option is lethal force. Or maybe the phone rang the cop got startled and had no choice but to open fire. So many excuses....
I'm just confused as to why you think the FBI could not do what we are talking about. You label them cops, but then your own group that you advocate for would also be cops. So why would it be a problem for the FBI and not for your group?
Pretty much every other civilised country doesn't do this and they don't have a problem with lots of police officers being killed, they don't have a problem with lots of members of the public being shot by police either.
I bring this up to the cop worshippers around here. They have a mental convulsion trying to defend why 1100 a year are killed in this country by cops. And thousands more are shot when a country like Germany can have under 100 total police shootings for the entire year. Chicago probably has that many police involved shootings in a month or less.
Do people trying to commit suicide on a bridge attempt to grab the cops and then jump?
False equivalency much?
They shouldn't be.
Mentally ill student with a history of depression and an attempted suicide calls police and reports himself as a suspicious person with knife and possibly gun.
Police respond assuming they will meet an armed person.
Police encounter said person, who is acting erratically. If anything, were the police to profile, the victim in this case actually fits the profile of a campus shooter.
Seems like suicide by police to me.
Do cops when they confront folks on a bridge trying to commit suicide oblige them and push them over? We need to change our culture so that the gun is not the solution to every difficult situation. Maybe get over ourselves and our arrogance and learn a little from other countries who don't have this problem.