More rebranding from AMD

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

zebrax2

Senior member
Nov 18, 2007
972
62
91
Pretty crappy move by AMD. I have no problems with renaming as long as they move them lower in the naming hierarchy.
 

Elfear

Diamond Member
May 30, 2004
7,115
690
126
Why "too harsh"? It is customer deception. As is when a laptop video module bears nearly the same name as a desktop video card but has drastically lower performance.

Wait, what? When has this not been true? The 5870M isn't nearly as powerful as the HD 5870. 580M vs GTX 580, 560M vs GTX 560, 6990M vs HD 6990, etc. etc.

Unless you get really angry every time a mobile GPU launches, this is pretty standard fare.
 

Flipped Gazelle

Diamond Member
Sep 5, 2004
6,666
3
81
Wait, what? When has this not been true? The 5870M isn't nearly as powerful as the HD 5870. 580M vs GTX 580, 560M vs GTX 560, 6990M vs HD 6990, etc. etc.

Unless you get really angry every time a mobile GPU launches, this is pretty standard fare.

I know, but I just don't like it, and just because it's "standard fare" doesn't mean it's right. It's deliberately deceptive advertising.
 

Flipped Gazelle

Diamond Member
Sep 5, 2004
6,666
3
81
How is it crappy for consumers who don't give a flip in the first place? You're upset but don't try to rationalize your opinion on some business practice on those of my mom who just buys a laptop and wants to play farmville and bejeweled.

Also, why are you going to waste your time trying to inform people who really don't care? I mean, really? Your gf or close family member, eh I guess. Even then though they don't give a crap and are accepting of your help because they're not going to want to tell you they don't give two shits about what really is the model number of their gpu. They'll feign interest at best. It's not some civic duty of yours to keep people from being deceived by the big bad OEMs. Learn to pick your fights.

You should hang out with different people, seriously. Or learn how to present what some people may consider to be "esoteric" information in an engaging and relatable way.

I - and many others - do consider it a civic duty to "keep people from being deceived by the big bad OEMs". It's part of being a good neighbor.
 

MrK6

Diamond Member
Aug 9, 2004
4,458
4
81
You should hang out with different people, seriously. Or learn how to present what some people may consider to be "esoteric" information in an engaging and relatable way.

I - and many others - do consider it a civic duty to "keep people from being deceived by the big bad OEMs". It's part of being a good neighbor.
Please explain how these people are being deceived.
 

Mistwalker

Senior member
Feb 9, 2007
343
0
71
Holy cow, marketing shoves decisions like this down the pipeline but...

"Nvidia does it too!"
"The customers buying these products won't know/care!"
"This is how it's always been done!"

...these are poor attempts to justify or forgive a crappy practice. All of these points could be true, it doesn't change the fact that it's crappy (unless you're not a consumer).
 

Flipped Gazelle

Diamond Member
Sep 5, 2004
6,666
3
81
Please explain how these people are being deceived.

Briefly... a few years ago I had a coworker who thought that he should pay an extra $50 (or something like that) for a system that had a 9800GT 512mb, rather than the 8800GT. He thought the 9800GT was newer tech and therefore better, despite the fact that it was merely a rebranded 8800GT. I call that deception.

edit: It might have been Cyberpower, but I'm not sure.

Also, and not-related to the "big bad OEMs", if I overhear someone getting the shuck-n-jive at Best Buy or wherever, I'll help 'em out.
 
Last edited:

Flipped Gazelle

Diamond Member
Sep 5, 2004
6,666
3
81
Holy cow, marketing shoves decisions like this down the pipeline but...

"Nvidia does it too!"
"The customers buying these products won't know/care!"
"This is how it's always been done!"

...these are poor attempts to justify or forgive a crappy practice. All of these points could be true, it doesn't change the fact that it's crappy (unless you're not a consumer).

Exactly. :thumbsup:
 

MrK6

Diamond Member
Aug 9, 2004
4,458
4
81
Briefly... a few years ago I had a coworker who thought that he should pay an extra $100 for a system that had a 9800GT, rather than the 8800GT. He thought the 9800GT was newer tech and therefore better, despite the fact that it was merely a rebranded 8800GT. I call that deception.

Also, and not-related to the "big bad OEMs", if I overhear someone getting the shuck-n-jive at Best Buy or wherever, I'll help 'em out.
But he wasn't deceived in that example. Unless there was an ad that said "Get the new, faster 9800GT!" associated with the PC or elsewhere, he made an erroneous assumption and you saved him from the consequences. Again, I'll use the car example and ask if any of the people that are so outraged here show the same outrage to auto manufacturers who use the same engine in next year's model? Responsible consumers learn about the products they're purchasing and don't make assumptions, especially when they're lacking info.

And I'm with you, I generally spend an hour doing a 15 minute errand in tech stores for the same reason.
 

dust

Golden Member
Oct 13, 2008
1,339
2
71
But he wasn't deceived in that example. Unless there was an ad that said "Get the new, faster 9800GT!" associated with the PC or elsewhere, he made an erroneous assumption and you saved him from the consequences. Again, I'll use the car example and ask if any of the people that are so outraged here show the same outrage to auto manufacturers who use the same engine in next year's model? Responsible consumers learn about the products they're purchasing and don't make assumptions, especially when they're lacking info.

And I'm with you, I generally spend an hour doing a 15 minute errand in tech stores for the same reason.

I think it was a fair assumption that the 9800gt should have been > than 8800gt given the new shiny name it got. Not everyone has time to do the proper research when purchasing a video card, for many of these customers these are just tools.

I think it's a wrong practice, no matter who's doing it, AMD and NVDA both suck!
 

max347

Platinum Member
Oct 16, 2007
2,334
6
81
How is it crappy for consumers who don't give a flip in the first place? You're upset but don't try to rationalize your opinion on some business practice on those of my mom who just buys a laptop and wants to play farmville and bejeweled.

Also, why are you going to waste your time trying to inform people who really don't care? I mean, really? Your gf or close family member, eh I guess. Even then though they don't give a crap and are accepting of your help because they're not going to want to tell you they don't give two shits about what really is the model number of their gpu. They'll feign interest at best. It's not some civic duty of yours to keep people from being deceived by the big bad OEMs. Learn to pick your fights.

This exactly. No one I help really cares- they'd be perfectly happy with a windows reinstall on a C2D system with an HD4350 gpu. ie, "brand new computer" to them.

Yeah, we all know its not a new card, but honestly I could give a dang less.

plus, I'm rooting for anything that makes AMD profit so they won't slip. Competition is great. I love my 2600k, but I dread what it would have cost if there wasn't the imminent BD release when I bought it ($260 shipped, bnib!)
 

Flipped Gazelle

Diamond Member
Sep 5, 2004
6,666
3
81
But he wasn't deceived in that example. Unless there was an ad that said "Get the new, faster 9800GT!" associated with the PC or elsewhere, he made an erroneous assumption and you saved him from the consequences. Again, I'll use the car example and ask if any of the people that are so outraged here show the same outrage to auto manufacturers who use the same engine in next year's model? Responsible consumers learn about the products they're purchasing and don't make assumptions, especially when they're lacking info.

And I'm with you, I generally spend an hour doing a 15 minute errand in tech stores for the same reason.

IMO, the rebranding of a video card in order to give it the appearance of moving up the ladder, or to associate it with it's higher-class but unrelated siblings, irks me. I consider it deceptive, but I'm a pretty straightforward person like that. I agree that people need to do their research, but I also think that companies prey on the laziness of people who don't.

re: automotive engines, as long as the carryover engine is not marketed as "new" then I don't have a problem with it. Also, engines are easier to quantify, because primary consumer-oriented metrics like fuel economy, HP and torque are both upfront and standardized measurements.
 

max347

Platinum Member
Oct 16, 2007
2,334
6
81
To the posters above, I don't think the 9800GT was a rebadge exactly. different fab (lower power), tri-sli support, and hdmi audio passthrough (maybe?)

Could be wrong tho
 

Flipped Gazelle

Diamond Member
Sep 5, 2004
6,666
3
81
To the posters above, I don't think the 9800GT was a rebadge exactly. different fab (lower power), tri-sli support, and hdmi audio passthrough (maybe?)

Could be wrong tho

I don't remember about the tri-sli & hdmi audio, but the 9800GT was initially on the same process as the 8800GT. There was a huge stink about it.

BTW, I should state that I don't know if Cyberpower (or whoever it was) was deliberately trying to deceive my coworker, it's entirely possible the PC he was looking at was old stock and not marked down.
 

MrK6

Diamond Member
Aug 9, 2004
4,458
4
81
I think it was a fair assumption that the 9800gt should have been > than 8800gt given the new shiny name it got. Not everyone has time to do the proper research when purchasing a video card, for many of these customers these are just tools.

I think it's a wrong practice, no matter who's doing it, AMD and NVDA both suck!
And that's my point, it's an assumption by the consumer that the part is newer, so it must be faster. Unless the claim is specifically made that this is so, the fault rests on the consumer. I'm not saying companies don't play into this either, for example, remember when many people erroneously assumed back in the day that their higher GHz Intel CPU's were faster than the lower clocked AMD's? In the end though, any fault rests on the consumer unless shown otherwise.
This exactly. No one I help really cares- they'd be perfectly happy with a windows reinstall on a C2D system with an HD4350 gpu. ie, "brand new computer" to them.

Yeah, we all know its not a new card, but honestly I could give a dang less.

plus, I'm rooting for anything that makes AMD profit so they won't slip. Competition is great. I love my 2600k, but I dread what it would have cost if there wasn't the imminent BD release when I bought it ($260 shipped, bnib!)
This is a whole other side to the argument, but I agree.
IMO, the rebranding of a video card in order to give it the appearance of moving up the ladder, or to associate it with it's higher-class but unrelated siblings, irks me. I consider it deceptive, but I'm a pretty straightforward person like that. I agree that people need to do their research, but I also think that companies prey on the laziness of people who don't.
And I agree, but you can't fault a company, which is there to make money, for using that to their advantage. As I said, if a current part fits within their performance range, they have already committed the R&D, and it is setup to run on a cheaper, larger process, they aren't going to throw away profit.
re: automotive engines, as long as the carryover engine is not marketed as "new" then I don't have a problem with it. Also, engines are easier to quantify, because primary consumer-oriented metrics like fuel economy, HP and torque are both upfront and standardized measurements.
But all car commercials say "the NEW 2012 Honda Accord" or whatever. My point is things get recycled. The 9800GT was a new card, it just used the same engine. :thumbsup:
 

VulgarDisplay

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2009
6,193
2
76
This is nothing new and it's not a big deal if you ask me. Anyone who isn't aware of this practice doesn't even know what a GPU is and could care less if the card they are getting in their $400 laptop can't run BF3.
 

Madcatatlas

Golden Member
Feb 22, 2010
1,155
0
0
This is the very low end. Wake me up when this is done like the 8600 to 9600, or like the 5770 to 6770
 

taltamir

Lifer
Mar 21, 2004
13,576
6
76
Maybe customer deception is a bit too harsh of a term to use, but this needs to stop.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/5291/amd-quietly-releases-the-oemonly-radeon-hd-7670-turks-rides-again

Its a legitimate and highly effective business strategy and good for AMD for respecting their shareholders enough to implement it. Although AFAIK they have ALWAYS had it in place. I know intel, AMD, and nVidia have been rebranding for at least a decade.

Although I have to admit I dislike it; I would have done the same.
 
Last edited:

GaiaHunter

Diamond Member
Jul 13, 2008
3,634
180
106
How is it crappy for consumers who don't give a flip in the first place? You're upset but don't try to rationalize your opinion on some business practice on those of my mom who just buys a laptop and wants to play farmville and bejeweled.

Also, why are you going to waste your time trying to inform people who really don't care? I mean, really? Your gf or close family member, eh I guess. Even then though they don't give a crap and are accepting of your help because they're not going to want to tell you they don't give two shits about what really is the model number of their gpu. They'll feign interest at best. It's not some civic duty of yours to keep people from being deceived by the big bad OEMs. Learn to pick your fights.

What are you talking about?

All this rebadge stuff is nuisance from everyone - the only interested are the stores that want to have stuff saying "New Model".

If I see someone choosing between pieces of hardware that are absolutely equal and one is more expensive than the other because it is new, I'll tell them buy the cheaper since it is the same.

Likewise if I see someone asking about a 6770, I'll point to "look for the 5770 and see it is cheaper".

If that is a strenuous civic fight...
 

pw38

Senior member
Apr 21, 2010
294
0
0
What are you talking about?

All this rebadge stuff is nuisance from everyone - the only interested are the stores that want to have stuff saying "New Model".

If I see someone choosing between pieces of hardware that are absolutely equal and one is more expensive than the other because it is new, I'll tell them buy the cheaper since it is the same.

Likewise if I see someone asking about a 6770, I'll point to "look for the 5770 and see it is cheaper".

If that is a strenuous civic fight...

All this rebadge stuff is a nuisance for you not for everyone. Your worldview on the situation is skewed because of your interest in it. I can respect your desire to help your fellow gamer but eh I just don't care that much. If you're purchasing a product, research it first. This happens across so many industries. I guess I don't really get into the whole Robin Hood mentality.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |