pinion9, you are correct on one thing. I have been quite condescending to you. And you know what, you're right, I do owe you an apology for that. So I do apologize for not being the nicest person.
Let me tell you though what the problem is that you have. You are correct in the fact that this topic is not about your religion, but about ours. However, you are quoting your opinion and beliefs about it. Therefore, your character, your understanding, and your beliefs do become important.
Given that, I will show you one of my questions, lest you feel you can get away from it. This is one of your comments, found on page 11 (at 40 post per page).
So you are saying that the Mormon religion has teachings that are conditional? If something is wrong, it is always wrong. You don't say "well there were extenuating circumstances, so I'll allow it." It can't be both ways. Either polygamy is wrong or it isn't.
Now, it is quite obvious from the scriptures that men such as Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob had multiple wives. So as you say, polygamy is either wrong or it isn't. With that in mind, what's the answer? Let me break it down for you.
1) It's wrong.
If that is indeed true, then those men previously listed stand under the condemnation of God. However, the Bible tells that those men were commanded by God to do what they did. So if this is true, either God is a liar, or the Bible is completely false.
2) It's right.
This would imply that you have no problem with what the Mormons did and with polygamy in their church. We know this can't be the answer because you wouldn't have brought it up if it was.
3) It can be right and wrong, given specific times.
If this is true, then your whole foundation just crumbled.
Can you see now where your understanding comes into question.
Now, let's look at your character. Again, another quote from you.
11 million members?!?! HAHAHAHA! Don't make me laugh. Even inactive members, such as my wife who has attended church in 5 or 6 years, is considered a member. See, what you people do is you get someone to join, but when they leave, it is a difficult process to get your name off the list and you still consider them a member. The fact of the matter is, the Mormon religion is a very small religion.
Now, there have been several post on here claiming that we excommunicate members for marrying non-members, for not paying their tithing, things such as this. You, however, claim that you are married to a non-active member of the church, but who is still a member. Why did you not come forth and state that such allogations were indeed false when you are living proof that they're not true? You claim you wife is still a member, so she couldn't have been excommunicated for marrying you, who are not a member (correct me if I'm wrong). Since she's also inactive, I'm going to guess she hasn't been paying tithing either, yet she hasn't been excommunicated for that either.
This is where I run into a problem with your character. You are not willing to address inaccuracies in the church, but only discriminating things that help you feel better about hating the church. This presents a very bad image on your character.
Considering all of this, why should anyone, anyone, belief your interpretations and understanding when they shine through as so much less than perfect in examples such as these?
There are some questions you can't claim you can't find. Answer them.