moshquerade
No Lifer
- Nov 1, 2001
- 61,504
- 12
- 56
Originally posted by: BlueFlamme
Originally posted by: DVK916
What is wrong with this topic. I posted a valid study.
You posted a website with 3 excerpts from studies performed in 1998 and 1999.
The "recent" studies of students were performed on samples sizes of 158 in 1980. Of "very high IQ group" was a sample size of 72 in 1968. It then picked out a select group of well known scientists.
What was the non-biased methods used to select these exact scientists?
It concluded with a 1995 Gallup poll which asked whether Religion was 1) very important in their life 2)answer all or most of today's problems. This poll can validly have someone who is not an Athiest answer in the negative based on the questions asked.
So OP please answer this, where is the validity in this so called study?
Some athiest probably did some basic googling, found a couple references that supported his hypothesis, and threw them together. Sound familiar to how your HS research papers went?
Originally posted by: Genx87
I see everybody else has noted the OPs closed mind so I wont pile it on.
But lets just say the OP wants to trade one religion for another.
Yup.Originally posted by: Genx87
But lets just say the OP wants to trade one religion for another.
Originally posted by: DVK916
Originally posted by: Genx87
I see everybody else has noted the OPs closed mind so I wont pile it on.
But lets just say the OP wants to trade one religion for another.
I am not close minded, if I was then I would be a theist.
Originally posted by: DVK916
Originally posted by: Genx87
I see everybody else has noted the OPs closed mind so I wont pile it on.
But lets just say the OP wants to trade one religion for another.
I am not close minded, if I was then I would be a theist.
Originally posted by: DVK916
Originally posted by: Genx87
I see everybody else has noted the OPs closed mind so I wont pile it on.
But lets just say the OP wants to trade one religion for another.
I am not close minded, if I was then I would be a theist.
Originally posted by: DVK916
Originally posted by: Genx87
I see everybody else has noted the OPs closed mind so I wont pile it on.
But lets just say the OP wants to trade one religion for another.
I am not close minded, if I was then I would be a theist.
No troll, you don't understand.Originally posted by: DVK916
Originally posted by: Genx87
I see everybody else has noted the OPs closed mind so I wont pile it on.
But lets just say the OP wants to trade one religion for another.
I am not close minded, if I was then I would be a theist.
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: DVK916
Originally posted by: Genx87
I see everybody else has noted the OPs closed mind so I wont pile it on.
But lets just say the OP wants to trade one religion for another.
I am not close minded, if I was then I would be a theist.
Trust us, you are closed minded.
Why dont you tells us about your grand idea that religion needs to be wiped off the face of the earth in order to build your Utopian communist society?
You are a great example of how far our university system has fallen.
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Originally posted by: DVK916
Originally posted by: Genx87
I see everybody else has noted the OPs closed mind so I wont pile it on.
But lets just say the OP wants to trade one religion for another.
I am not close minded, if I was then I would be a theist.
You don't sound old enough but I really must ask....did you eat paint chips as a small child?
Originally posted by: DVK916
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Originally posted by: DVK916
Originally posted by: Genx87
I see everybody else has noted the OPs closed mind so I wont pile it on.
But lets just say the OP wants to trade one religion for another.
I am not close minded, if I was then I would be a theist.
You don't sound old enough but I really must ask....did you eat paint chips as a small child?
Why do you insist on attacking me?
Originally posted by: DVK916
Why do you insist on attacking me?
oh snapOriginally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: DVK916
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Originally posted by: DVK916
Originally posted by: Genx87
I see everybody else has noted the OPs closed mind so I wont pile it on.
But lets just say the OP wants to trade one religion for another.
I am not close minded, if I was then I would be a theist.
You don't sound old enough but I really must ask....did you eat paint chips as a small child?
Why do you insist on attacking me?
Because you make it so damn easy! You post a thread about intelligence and you display none!
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: DVK916
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Originally posted by: DVK916
Originally posted by: Genx87
I see everybody else has noted the OPs closed mind so I wont pile it on.
But lets just say the OP wants to trade one religion for another.
I am not close minded, if I was then I would be a theist.
You don't sound old enough but I really must ask....did you eat paint chips as a small child?
Why do you insist on attacking me?
Because you make it so damn easy! You post a thread about intelligence and you display none!
Pr 11:2.Originally posted by: thecoolnessrune
I am a Christian and have had SAT scores posting PHS since the 6th grade. Couldn't say that about any other kids ive met.
Originally posted by: scottish144
Of course. This is exactly why ID was rejected by the scientific community. However, I believe that atheism is stupid. Skepticism (what I follow) is the belief of the POSSIBILITY that any number of gods may exist. God, Allah, Vishnu, and others may exist/co-exist/not exist. However, I consider the probability of their existance to be extremely low. In short: Stating that something has a low probability of existing is fine, but stating that something outright DOESN'T exist is stupid.
Originally posted by: DougK62
Originally posted by: scottish144
Of course. This is exactly why ID was rejected by the scientific community. However, I believe that atheism is stupid. Skepticism (what I follow) is the belief of the POSSIBILITY that any number of gods may exist. God, Allah, Vishnu, and others may exist/co-exist/not exist. However, I consider the probability of their existance to be extremely low. In short: Stating that something has a low probability of existing is fine, but stating that something outright DOESN'T exist is stupid.
So you're agnostic.
Originally posted by: Hacp
Not True. Harriet Meirs, the smartest person Bush knows, is very religous. PWNED!