- Nov 11, 2004
- 12,571
- 4
- 81
Originally posted by: magomago
No offense but the ram options are sreally messed up What makes u think 160 megs of ram, but you skip 384?
it hsould have gone 32,64,128,192,256,384,512,768,1024,etc. etc.
not junk like 832 megabytes!?! That means you ned a 512 stick, a 256 stick, and a freaking 64 megabyte stick!!!
Maybe back <256 days 64 meg increase was something to note....
but considering that >512 is a phenomona of today, and pc3200 has been standard for HOW LONG now...i even doubt the fact that 64megs of pc3200 exists. if it does, its probably for embedded purposes and not general ram u can buy...
I made a mistake when creating the poll, 384 MB is there and is at the bottom of the Memory page.
Crucial used to have PC3200 32 and 64mb DDR sticks on their site, but there are still plenty of machines running SDRAM PC 66, 100, 133.
not junk like 832 megabytes!?! That means you ned a 512 stick, a 256 stick, and a freaking 64 megabyte stick!!!
Good job doing the math. It is a very good possibilty of someone runing 832MB, My thinking was some one who bought a 64 mb system later added 256 (i got a sitck of 256 crucial in 2000 for $12 at Best Buy after rebate), now that 512 is cheap, why not add it? (2.5-3 years ago I bought a 512 MB stick for $71@Crucial.com and now goes for over $100). It is a perfetly feasable number.
Also Look at the fact that there are older systems still in use like a few classic pentiums with 16mb!
512 MB is hardly a phenomona of today, more like yesterday.