MS: Kinect no longer required

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,027
5,912
126
To be fair, I'm not entirely certain why a Kinect is needed for a set top box either. Personally it's refreshing to see all the 180's Microsoft is doing, finally listening to consumers instead of shoving crap down their throats.

i think that is one of the major worries about kinect that a lot of people have. they are (were) shoving it down our throats as this awesome device, but they have yet to really show us WHY it is necessary, both in features and games. so far all they've really shown with kinect is it can do stuff that you could already do with controllers, for the most part. there are some neat things, such as auto syncing based on where you are sitting in the room, changing controls to the personal preferences based on the face, and a few little things like that. but nothing that really screams "MUST HAVE/NEED THIS!"

then we have games ... they haven't showed us 1 game where it uses kinect for anything new gameplay wise. at least nothing that is memorable or to get excited about.

i'm also glad it's not required because my setup is not logistically set up for a kinect, unless it has like a 25ft wire that i can run from my a/v closet to in front of my screen. it would annoying to have to put it away after every use too. of course i could have kept it sitting in my dark closet connected, but this makes it easier.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,377
126
Hear, hear! Well said sir.

I do hope they come up with something amazing that makes it something we DO really want. I just don't see it yet for the core gaming crowd as yet. Skype, gesturing, etc, sure kinda cool. But legit gaming? Show me
 
Oct 19, 2000
17,860
4
81
To be fair, I'm not entirely certain why a Kinect is needed for a set top box either. Personally it's refreshing to see all the 180's Microsoft is doing, finally listening to consumers instead of shoving crap down their throats.

They're not listening to consumers, they're doing damage control because of the loud ass 1% on the internet, which have caused such an uproar because consoles are life and death, ya know.

I miss the days when you see a product that's being offered and if you don't like it, you just say "pass". Nope, it has to be an all out war of attrition with these consoles for some reason. I'm getting to the point where I don't ever want a PS4 just to spite all the idiotic bullshit over the past 2 months.
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
They're not listening to consumers, they're doing damage control because of the loud ass 1% on the internet, which have caused such an uproar because consoles are life and death, ya know.

I miss the days when you see a product that's being offered and if you don't like it, you just say "pass". Nope, it has to be an all out war of attrition with these consoles for some reason. I'm getting to the point where I don't ever want a PS4 just to spite all the idiotic bullshit over the past 2 months.

Haha...don't be butthurt cause people don't worship Microsoft and called them on their bs. Every bit of the kinect is required, 24 hour check in, DRM locked games etc was utter garbage. They got called on it and instead of losing a ton of sales, decided to drop these things. Its a win, win situation now.
 
Last edited:

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,377
126
Haha...don't be butthurt cause people don't worship Microsoft and called them on their bs. Every bit of the kinect is required, 24 hour check in, DRM locked games etc was utter garbage. They got called on it and instead of losing a ton of sales, decided to drop these things. Its a win, win situation now.

Yep. Not to mention the 'loud' folks that probably include me, also dissed the idiotic $599 pricing of the PS3.

I swear some people just can't stand hearing honest opinions. You can always tell a Sony fanboy when they say things like "The PS3 was a bargain for $599!", and you can always tell the Xbox fanboys from their not being totally stunned at the initial BS Microsoft tried to pull with the whole online/Kinect required/etc.

These companies don't give a crap about us. They just want our money. Don't be a fanboy. Either corp is jam packed with people who would burn children alive if there were profit in it.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
Yep. Not to mention the 'loud' folks that probably include me, also dissed the idiotic $599 pricing of the PS3.

I swear some people just can't stand hearing honest opinions. You can always tell a Sony fanboy when they say things like "The PS3 was a bargain for $599!", and you can always tell the Xbox fanboys from their not being totally stunned at the initial BS Microsoft tried to pull with the whole online/Kinect required/etc.

These companies don't give a crap about us. They just want our money. Don't be a fanboy. Either corp is jam packed with people who would burn children alive if there were profit in it.

You're right! A person living in a first world country that has already experienced the "outrage" over the DD stuff in 2003/2004 when Steam was released is a total Xbox Fanboy! It doesn't matter that they aren't effected the shift in distribution and software licenses. It also doesn't matter when the person has also openly stated they are getting both consoles.
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
You're right! A person living in a first world country that has already experienced the "outrage" over the DD stuff in 2003/2004 when Steam was released is a total Xbox Fanboy! It doesn't matter that they aren't effected the shift in distribution and software licenses. It also doesn't matter when the person has also openly stated they are getting both consoles.

What you forget is that you weren't just locked in if you bought digital. Hat is expected, but if you buy the disk you are locked in as well. The PC is a different animal, I don't think the consoles were ready for it especially not when your closest competitor is not doing it.
 

blackened23

Diamond Member
Jul 26, 2011
8,548
2
0
Even if MS is dead set on including kinect, they haven't made any appreciable effort into showing the masses what the benefits are. Sure, it can listen to voice commands and obey hand gestures while i'm watching netflix or using skype, but do I *really* want that? MS needs to sell this feature if they're charging so much for it, and they just haven't done an adequate job of it.

I feel like the XB1 will be a fine console, but I really do prefer the option of going without kinect - that is, unless MS shows me something absolutely mind blowing in terms of a game that uses it. They have not done so thus far - the set top box features are nice, but in the end my primary reason for purchase is gaming. I'm a huge multiplayer fighting/FPS game aficionado and I quite enjoy the fact that consoles have a huge playerbase for such titles, that is why I want a console. The set top box features (which ties in with the kinect voice commands) are nice but aren't a primary purchase consideration.

I've said it before and i'll say it again, I feel like XBLG is a superior experience to PSN online currently, and that is why I want the XB1 to be a viable contender. I want to like it, because I like the 360. MS needs to sell (eg show us the benefits) this feature to us. If they don't, then they should make it optional. If they don't make it optional and don't show us the benefits, they can count on an appreciable amounts of folks turning towards the PS4, instead..
 
Last edited:

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
Even if MS is dead set on including kinect, they haven't made any appreciable effort into showing the masses what the benefits are. Sure, it can listen voice commands while i'm watching netflix, but do I *really* want that? MS needs to sell this feature if they're charging so much for it, and they just haven't done an adequate job of it.

I feel like the XB1 will be a fine console, but I really do prefer the option of going without kinect - that is, unless MS shows me something absolutely mind blowing in terms of a game that uses it. They have not done so thus far - the set top box features are nice, but in the end my primary reason for purchase is gaming. I'm a huge multiplayer fighting/FPS game aficionado and I quite enjoy the fact that consoles have a huge playerbase for such titles, that is why I want a console. The set top box features (which ties in with the kinect voice commands) are nice but aren't a primary purchase consideration.

I've said it before and i'll say it again, I feel like XBLG is a superior experience to PSN online currently, and that is why I want the XB1 to be a viable contender. I want to like it, because I like the 360. MS needs to sell (eg show us the benefits) this feature to us. If they don't, then they should make it optional. If they don't, they can count on an appreciable amounts of folks turning towards the PS4, instead..

Yeah they seem to be playing the game of "you'll see why it is great" but not really having anything to show, hoping some developer does something with it.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
What you forget is that you weren't just locked in if you bought digital. Hat is expected, but if you buy the disk you are locked in as well. The PC is a different animal, I don't think the consoles were ready for it especially not when your closest competitor is not doing it.

I understand most console gamers aren't ready for it, I think if they had it forced on them, they'd come around pretty quickly. 99% of Steam users forget how much PC gamers kicked and screamed over it, despite the industry alternatives ruining your OS install or messing up your CD burner.

I still firmly believe making the disc worthless other than data transfer is the way to go. Especially, if there was some automatic authentication that can be done. No CD keys or anything. Just sign into your Xbox Live account, pop in the disc, throw the disc away after install.

Maybe the next console iteration. =(
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
If I could put a SSD in there for faster loading or a TB class HDD for having more games installed at once I guess I would be able to deal with that. Even using USB it would hamper ssd performance. This is assuming it could take advantage of an ssd which I believe it could.
 

ImpulsE69

Lifer
Jan 8, 2010
14,946
1,077
126
It's because the people who are touting it really have no clue what it does. They are being told by the engineers who created it why it is so great. Same thing that happens in every other business. The non-technical people get all starry-eyed by the "magic" that is being sold to them. Just like the "cloud" buzzword, it sounds amazing when you have no idea how it works in practice and that it doesn't suit every scenario.

I have no doubts there are probably some very cool things that can be done with the Kinect/Eyetoy, but honestly, those things are better suited to PC's than consoles. The things that are happening on the PC side with them are amazing. I'm currently expermenting with head tracking in 3D pinball simulations (I didn't do it, someone else did), and it's pretty damn cool.

If you are going to design a system around a mandatory piece of equipment that jacks the price up, you very well better have a very intriguing demo to show it off, and they just haven't done it...and considering there was little to show that was worthwhile with the first gen of them, people aren't expecting much with the new gen.

As for the Steam comparisons, as usual, Steam exploded with the large discounts, well and Half Life / TF franchise. If it weren't for that, it'd be much like Origin at this point...maybe not struggling, but not nearly as huge.
 
Last edited:

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,377
126
Yeah they seem to be playing the game of "you'll see why it is great" but not really having anything to show, hoping some developer does something with it.

After all the gimmicky garbage gamers have seen shoveled at us over the years :

Wii balance board
Wii motion shake controller
Kinect1
Move
etc

I think people are starting to get fed up with this stuff that doesn't really add appreciably to the gameplay. Some of it is 'sort of cool' to mess around with for a few hours, but gets old pretty darned fast compared to just sitting down and playing a game traditionally, which is how every single AAA title functions. Do you think COD would sell millions if you had to shake your controller like a moron in order to reload? Or madden where the only way to move around the field was to lean around on the balance board? I think not.
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
After all the gimmicky garbage gamers have seen shoveled at us over the years :

Wii balance board
Wii motion shake controller
Kinect1
Move
etc

I think people are starting to get fed up with this stuff that doesn't really add appreciably to the gameplay. Some of it is 'sort of cool' to mess around with for a few hours, but gets old pretty darned fast compared to just sitting down and playing a game traditionally, which is how every single AAA title functions. Do you think COD would sell millions if you had to shake your controller like a moron in order to reload? Or madden where the only way to move around the field was to lean around on the balance board? I think not.

No but a cod battle simulator with a kinect tracking your movements and an oculas rift displaying a 3d image in 1080p and no lag may sell. That just is going to be too expensive and niche though.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
After all the gimmicky garbage gamers have seen shoveled at us over the years :

Wii balance board
Wii motion shake controller
Kinect1
Move
etc

I think people are starting to get fed up with this stuff that doesn't really add appreciably to the gameplay. Some of it is 'sort of cool' to mess around with for a few hours, but gets old pretty darned fast compared to just sitting down and playing a game traditionally, which is how every single AAA title functions. Do you think COD would sell millions if you had to shake your controller like a moron in order to reload? Or madden where the only way to move around the field was to lean around on the balance board? I think not.
Madden started to incorporate some of the Kinect stuff into the game. Using the mic on it to allow you to shout audibles. Paul Rudd and Ray Lewis had a commercial featuring it.

Developers just haven't figured out how to use it properly for games. It suffers the same problem phones have with games. They either try to emulate (very poorly) current control schemes or go with the "one big button" approach and it is terrible. Angry birds actually used the touch controls very well IMO, despite not being an incredibly great game (again IMO). The Kinect needs an app that does that.
 

Keeper

Senior member
Mar 9, 2005
905
0
71
Man... I must be old...... I dont understand the furor over this.
I upgraded my DVD player a year ago. Went Blue Ray/ Paid 40 bucks more and got a WIFI one. DIDNT spend the 65 more to get wireless and a USB port (WTF is that for? Photos? Porn?)
Wireless, I thought, that had potential.

Now, I watch Netflix all the time. YOU tube on the big screen is friggin funny as hell. I can cheer myself up just searchinng EPIC fail and I feel better about my life.
Do PEOPLE really buy consoles with Netflix and or Hulu etc. as a decsion driver?

Quick, someone get me my shawl and cane.. And get those damn kids off my lawn.

I have not followed MS since their horrid release on this unit. Its GOOD to see them reversing positions.
PS4 will be for me. I have always wanted to try "The Show" and I will watch to see if they are making a version of "The Last Of Us". As both those have always had my interest.
GLTA
 

Keeper

Senior member
Mar 9, 2005
905
0
71
After all the gimmicky garbage gamers have seen shoveled at us over the years :

Wii balance board
Wii motion shake controller
Kinect1
Move
etc

I think people are starting to get fed up with this stuff that doesn't really add appreciably to the gameplay. Some of it is 'sort of cool' to mess around with for a few hours, but gets old pretty darned fast compared to just sitting down and playing a game traditionally, which is how every single AAA title functions. Do you think COD would sell millions if you had to shake your controller like a moron in order to reload? Or madden where the only way to move around the field was to lean around on the balance board? I think not.


LOL the WII trransition in my house was rapid. the first two months, we were exhausted from playing bowling, baseball, tennis etc... Month 3 We figured out how to do 90% with just wrist motions.

That being said I agree with all your points. I almost bought the Kinect for ME3. Glad I didnt. Looked cool, but I looked at my gaming. I fumble with the buttons enough as is. In a tight spot I could ONLY imagine what audible screw-ups I would do. And as a lot of my gaming is late night, wifey would not be happy with me screaming Weapon Switch; Pistol.... NO Pistol.... Damn, not Med kit..... PISTOL" :\
 
Last edited:

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,377
126
Nope, I don't think Netflix on console is a decision driver at all. It's dumb of MS to paywall it for no good reason, but overall it's a big fat zero in terms of 'does this matter'?

In fact, none of the media portions of consoles really matter worth a damn. All those PS3s sold simply to be HTPC-like devices and bluray players typically never sold games, which is how they make their real money. The more someone uses the console to do something OTHER than gaming, the companies aren't banking. After all, paying for XBL or PS+ is an annoyance, but it's not really very much money in the big picture. They make their real cash on that guy who buys 5-10 games a month.
 

tential

Diamond Member
May 13, 2008
7,348
642
121
Once again us real gamers helped get the fanbois a better product. You're welcome. ( And you two know who you are.)

I really despise this sentiment. Who CARES if the Kinect had to be connected all the time. IT STILL comes with the Xbox One. You might as well have it connected. There are many features that probably won't ever be touched because of this.

"Real Gamers" Have essentially bullied companies into not doing any innovation, and sticking with the same phucking model of "Graphics graphics graphics." This isn't what the majority of gamers want, it's just what gamers who are "nerdy" enough to follow a consoles development and complain.

I had no problem with the Kinect, the graphics of the Xbox One, the Used Game thing, or ANYTHING actually. The only problem I had was with MS's explanation of why I should want their product. They showed no good implementations of the Kinect, Showed no good use of the cloud, and didn't explain the fact that you could share games among family members. The just marketed the thing terribly so people hated it.

"Real Gamers" and "Real Hardware Enthusiasts" can really be short sighted. I'm happy that at least Intel doesn't listen to "Real Hardware Enthusiasts" otherwise we'd have no interest in tablets/notebooks and instead 200-300W TDP parts being pushed onto people who simply want to do Facebook on their PC.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,377
126
LOL the WII trransition i my house was rapid. the first two months, we were exhausted from playing bowling, baseball, tennis etc... Month 3 We figured out how to do 90% with just wrist motions.

That being said I agree with all your points. I almost bought the Kinect for ME3. Glad I didnt. Looked cool, but I looked at my gaming. I fumble with the buttons enough as is. In a tight spot I could ONLY imagine what audible screw-ups I would do. And as a lot of my gaming is late night, wifey would not be happy with me screaming Weapon Switch; Pistol.... NO Pistol.... Damn, not Med kit..... PISTOL" :\

LOL yeah. Yelling at my console is not appealing to me in the least.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,377
126
I really despise this sentiment. Who CARES if the Kinect had to be connected all the time. IT STILL comes with the Xbox One. You might as well have it connected. There are many features that probably won't ever be touched because of this.

"Real Gamers" Have essentially bullied companies into not doing any innovation, and sticking with the same phucking model of "Graphics graphics graphics." This isn't what the majority of gamers want, it's just what gamers who are "nerdy" enough to follow a consoles development and complain.

I had no problem with the Kinect, the graphics of the Xbox One, the Used Game thing, or ANYTHING actually. The only problem I had was with MS's explanation of why I should want their product. They showed no good implementations of the Kinect, Showed no good use of the cloud, and didn't explain the fact that you could share games among family members. The just marketed the thing terribly so people hated it.

"Real Gamers" and "Real Hardware Enthusiasts" can really be short sighted. I'm happy that at least Intel doesn't listen to "Real Hardware Enthusiasts" otherwise we'd have no interest in tablets/notebooks and instead 200-300W TDP parts being pushed onto people who simply want to do Facebook on their PC.

Eh, what really was the innovation in terms of actual gaming? That may be your point here I suppose.

We got :

Online requirement
Used game / rental game lockouts
Ability to yell at your console
Bundled Kinect, which was already seen as a silly gimmick device
Watch TV?

We could already watch TV just fine, and the rest of it just seemed silly and adding nothing to actual gaming. I think that's what they failed to show us as you say. It was all 'bleh, what the hell'? Instead of 'wow that's cool!'.

I mean seriously, were we supposed to be amazed that we could watch TV? We've only been watching TV for decades with no trouble. Amazed that we could do fantasy football? I can do that on my smartphone and take it with me. I'm still not sure what they were thinking with the reveal.

That said, they've REALLY come a long way, and I think XB1 will be fantastic. There's nothing stopping 'innovation' other than MS themselves.

Build something great, and they will sell it by the truckload.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
I really despise this sentiment. Who CARES if the Kinect had to be connected all the time. IT STILL comes with the Xbox One. You might as well have it connected. There are many features that probably won't ever be touched because of this.

"Real Gamers" Have essentially bullied companies into not doing any innovation, and sticking with the same phucking model of "Graphics graphics graphics." This isn't what the majority of gamers want, it's just what gamers who are "nerdy" enough to follow a consoles development and complain.

I had no problem with the Kinect, the graphics of the Xbox One, the Used Game thing, or ANYTHING actually. The only problem I had was with MS's explanation of why I should want their product. They showed no good implementations of the Kinect, Showed no good use of the cloud, and didn't explain the fact that you could share games among family members. The just marketed the thing terribly so people hated it.

"Real Gamers" and "Real Hardware Enthusiasts" can really be short sighted. I'm happy that at least Intel doesn't listen to "Real Hardware Enthusiasts" otherwise we'd have no interest in tablets/notebooks and instead 200-300W TDP parts being pushed onto people who simply want to do Facebook on their PC.
I agree they were marketing failures on most points. The complaint about the used games was valid to a point, but I felt the pros of the DD model outweighed the cons for not being able to sell your games outside of the official channels MS was proposing.
 
Oct 19, 2000
17,860
4
81
Haha...don't be butthurt cause people don't worship Microsoft and called them on their bs. Every bit of the kinect is required, 24 hour check in, DRM locked games etc was utter garbage. They got called on it and instead of losing a ton of sales, decided to drop these things. Its a win, win situation now.

You call it BS, I don't. Again, what happened to just saying "pass" on a product? You hop on here and blah blah blah blah blah bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch. That's all I see anymore. Are you not done blabbing about the "utter garbage"?

Don't get all butthurt because Microsoft doesn't share your vision of what a console should be.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |