MSNBC poll - 86% want impeachment

[novon]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10562904/

 

[kogase]

MSNBC open online poll...

 

[Engineer]

Originally posted by: kogase
MSNBC open online poll...

Online polls are pretty much meaningless (I don't mean poll results shown online, I mean polls that are "taken" online).

 

[Tab]

I'd agree with it, I'd say there is substainal evidence for some kind of investigation of somesort... Which could then lead to a possible impeachment.

 

[DickFnTracy]

The only honest answer to that poll is, "I don't know."

 

[Harvey]

Originally posted by: DickFnTracy
The only honest answer to that poll is, "I don't know."

WRONG! The only honest answer is, "HELL YES!"

 

[CKent]

Only 86%?

 

[xeemzor]

The only problem with impeaching Bush is that Cheney becomes the President.

 

[Harvey]

Originally posted by: xeemzor
The only problem with impeaching Bush is that Cheney becomes the President.

Which is why, during the early Nixon administration, there were bumper stickers that said, Get Spiro first..

Bush and Cheney are both up to thier eyeballs in the same crimes. We have to nail this entire administration of sicko liars, preferably while we still have some of the Constitution still in force.

 

[xeemzor]

If both of them resigned/were impeached then Dennis Hastert would become the president. Does anyone know anything about Dennis? He is relativly unkown to me. Ironically, after Hastert in the order of presidential succession, it's Ted Steves.

 

[judasmachine]

Originally posted by: xeemzor
The only problem with impeaching Bush is that Cheney becomes the President.

That's my fear too. I bet we could tie some of these charges to him, since he prolly gave the orders in the first place.

 

[Engineer]

Originally posted by: xeemzor
If both of them resigned/were impeached then Dennis Hastert would become the president. Does anyone know anything about Dennis? He is relativly unkown to me. Ironically, after Hastert in the order of presidential succession, it's Ted Steves.

Hastert is second only to Tom Delay in taking special interest vacations and perks (at the special interest expense). He's another corporate fondling douchebag (well, they all are....some more than others).

 

[Darkhawk28]

Originally posted by: Engineer

Originally posted by: xeemzor
If both of them resigned/were impeached then Dennis Hastert would become the president. Does anyone know anything about Dennis? He is relativly unkown to me. Ironically, after Hastert in the order of presidential succession, it's Ted Steves.

Hastert is second only to Tom Delay in taking special interest vacations and perks (at the special interest expense). He's another corporate fondling douchebag (well, they all are....some more than others).

Hastert takes dirty Turkish monies while Delay takes dirty Russian money.

As for these polls, I found it quite funny that MSNBC never mentioned the results of this poll on the TV like they normally do with the rest of them.

 

[MadRat]

Nobody need replace an impeached President unless that person was also removed.

I'm thinking that Congress appoints a removed President. Impeachment can mean censureship, not necessarily removal.

 

[Thug Esquire]

Originally posted by: Harvey

Originally posted by: DickFnTracy
The only honest answer to that poll is, "I don't know."

WRONG! The only honest answer is, "HELL YES!"

AMEN RIGHT ON MY BROTHA'!!

 

[TallBill]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

As for these polls, I found it quite funny that MSNBC never mentioned the results of this poll on the TV like they normally do with the rest of them.

Because its not a scientific poll. Only the people that feel heated enough to vote will vote in a non-random poll. I'm sure the poll is spreading like wildfire on anti-bush websites and blogs.

 

[Darkhawk28]

Originally posted by: TallBill

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

As for these polls, I found it quite funny that MSNBC never mentioned the results of this poll on the TV like they normally do with the rest of them.

Because its not a scientific poll. Only the people that feel heated enough to vote will vote in a non-random poll. I'm sure the poll is spreading like wildfire on anti-bush websites and blogs.

They broadcast their online polls ALL THE TIME, not just the scientific ones.

 

[JustAnAverageGuy]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
As for these polls, I found it quite funny that MSNBC never mentioned the results of this poll on the TV like they normally do with the rest of them.

More than likely, because common sense would dictate that the results probably aren't accurate. That and the questions are loaded.

 

[TallBill]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
They broadcast their online polls ALL THE TIME, not just the scientific ones.

Gotcha, I dont watch the show so I didn't realize that. Its pretty pathetic that the news even does non-scientific polls to begin with. Since 90% of people dont understand the difference.

 

[XZeroII]

I could write a script that would bring that No category right up. That is why it is not a true poll.

 

[Darkhawk28]

Originally posted by: XZeroII
I could write a script that would bring that No category right up. That is why it is not a true poll.

I don't think anybody ever claimed it was a REAL poll. Although, I'm not sure what Novon's take on this was, because he didn't post any of his own input in the thread.

 

[MadRat]

Write a script that says "Yes". Its more PC.

 

[Bowfinger]

Originally posted by: XZeroII
I could write a script that would bring that No category right up. That is why it is not a true poll.

Yeah, I suspect that's where the 8% "No, the man has done absolutely nothing wrong." came from (as opposed to the other "No" option which acknowledges some "missteps", but nothing rising to impeachable). Surely no thinking human being can sincerely believe Bush has done "absolutely nothing" wrong. Therefore, the votes must have come from bots, either scripted, or from rallying the human drones.

Also note that the "Yes" option doesn't say Bush should be removed from office, merely that he should be tried. If the Bush faithful truly believe in his innocence, shouldn't they welcome a fair trial to clear the air and exonerate him?

 

[GroundedSailor]

Originally posted by: Bowfinger

Originally posted by: XZeroII
I could write a script that would bring that No category right up. That is why it is not a true poll.

Yeah, I suspect that's where the 8% "No, the man has done absolutely nothing wrong." came from (as opposed to the other "No" option which acknowledges some "missteps", but nothing rising to impeachable). Surely no thinking human being can sincerely believe Bush has done "absolutely nothing" wrong. Therefore, the votes must have come from bots, either scripted, or from rallying the human drones.

Also note that the "Yes" option doesn't say Bush should be removed from office, merely that he should be tried. If the Bush faithful truly believe in his innocence, shouldn't they welcome a fair trial to clear the air and exonerate him?

You used the keywords, "thinking human being". The bush faithful are basically that, faithful, because they don't think for themselves.

 

[Al Neri]

My poll says 94% of polls are slighted or biast.