News Mueller Day - Thursday 4.18.19

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,481
8,341
126
Well my 20 minutes of state sanctioned propaganda have been met for the day. Time for POTUS and Fox to meme away.
 

VRAMdemon

Diamond Member
Aug 16, 2012
6,974
8,490
136
Did the AG really explain that the obstruction was justified because the president's feelings were hurt?

So the AG has been working with Donald's lawyers all the while. What a shock. Sad that Barr throws what until now had been a bipartisan good reputation and throws it right in the shitter.

If it’s "lightly" redacted, why did it take so long to release? Did they need to get Putin's blessing?

Personally, I'll just skip the press conference, unless there are reports that Rosenstein decided to fall on his sword and start walking through the list of open investigations on national TV, just to get tackled by secret service.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,520
15,401
136
Well my 20 minutes of state sanctioned propaganda have been met for the day. Time for POTUS and Fox to meme away.

Apparently Chris wallace even said Barr was the president's defense attorney today and not the people's attorney general.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,481
8,341
126
Did the AG really explain that the obstruction was justified because the president's feelings were hurt?

So the AG has been working with Donald's lawyers all the while. What a shock. Sad that Barr throws what until now had been a bipartisan good reputation and throws it right in the shitter.

If it’s "lightly" redacted, why did it take so long to release? Did they need to get Putin's blessing?

Personally, I'll just skip the press conference, unless there are reports that Rosenstein decided to fall on his sword and start walking through the list of open investigations on national TV, just to get tackled by secret service.

It was 20 minutes of this. You could have had a cardboard standup there and no one would have known.



 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
15,237
13,514
146
Intent matters a lot in basically all crimes. If you drop an anvil off a building because you're clumsy and it kills someone that's a lot different than dropping an anvil off a building for the purpose of killing someone.

What I think is incredible is that Barr is arguing that if Trump sincerely believed the investigation was meritless then it wouldn't be illegal for him to obstruct it. That's comically, laughably wrong.
If you're caught speeding with intent, that's probably reckless endangerment or exhibition of speed. No intent, it's still speeding.

If you kill someone with intent, it's one of the various murders. Without, it's still manslaughter.

I cannot really think of a single crime that you just get off scot free without intent, unless someone's just being lenient. Punishments exist for crimes without intent specifically to keep people aware that they are crimes, so people don't do them.
 
Reactions: Younigue

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,533
50,706
136
If you're caught speeding with intent, that's probably reckless endangerment or exhibition of speed. No intent, it's still speeding.

Speeding is a civil infraction, not a criminal statute. Intent is not required for civil infractions but it is required for criminal statutes.

If you kill someone with intent, it's one of the various murders. Without, it's still manslaughter.

I cannot really think of a single crime that you just get off scot free without intent, unless someone's just being lenient. Punishments exist for crimes without intent specifically to keep people aware that they are crimes, so people don't do them.

Murder is a crime you get off for without intent. Manslaughter still requires gross negligence and intent to commit the grossly negligent act. Basically every criminal statute requires intent.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mens_rea
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
15,237
13,514
146
Speeding is a civil infraction, not a criminal statute. Intent is not required for civil infractions but it is required for criminal statutes.



Murder is a crime you get off for without intent. Manslaughter still requires gross negligence and intent to commit the grossly negligent act. Basically every criminal statute requires intent.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mens_rea
My mistake. I still think it's unlikely that you can state that he didn't have intent given that he was never interviewed. IMO it should still be considered an open investigation :|
 

VRAMdemon

Diamond Member
Aug 16, 2012
6,974
8,490
136
Ok..I caught the video of the presser..

He said "No collusion" several times and said no obstruction because Trump was sad about the investigation.

Barr, paraphrased: "If any obstruction occurred, it's only because the president was frustrated by all those big meanies demanding a lawful investigation..."

Even though I pretty much knew something like this was coming, the utter shamelessness of Barr's public fellation of the President is a fucking travesty

How did Barr maintain such clear diction without breaking liplock with the president's anus?
 
Reactions: DarthKyrie

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,533
50,706
136
My mistake. I still think it's unlikely that you can state that he didn't have intent given that he was never interviewed. IMO it should still be considered an open investigation :|

I 100% agree with you! I also think that even if we accept Barr's interpretation of Trump's intent it doesn't hold up. He's basically trying to argue that because Trump was mad about Mueller's investigation he was entitled to obstruct it. This is laughably false.
 
Reactions: [DHT]Osiris

thilanliyan

Lifer
Jun 21, 2005
11,944
2,172
126
I don't understand why these people think that Trump won't get to see the full unredacted report whether or not it ever gets released to Congress or the public. Hell, I'd be surprised if Barr didn't give a copy to the WH before he even started reading it himself.
Yeah, but will he read passed the cover page?
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/barr-press-conference

"Attorney General William Barr on Thursday affirmed that Special Counsel Robert Mueller found no evidence of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians during the 2016 presidential election, addressing reporters shortly before he is expected to release Mueller's report to Congress and to the public."


This needs to be put to rest already. It was a political witch hunt, no question about it. It was always built on the everybody gets a trophy crowd not being able to handle not getting their way. You lefties should apologize.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,200
16,657
136
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/barr-press-conference

"Attorney General William Barr on Thursday affirmed that Special Counsel Robert Mueller found no evidence of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians during the 2016 presidential election, addressing reporters shortly before he is expected to release Mueller's report to Congress and to the public."


This needs to be put to rest already. It was a political witch hunt, no question about it. It was always built on the everybody gets a trophy crowd not being able to handle not getting their way. You lefties should apologize.

Release the full report, let subject matter experts review it and come to the same or at least similar conclusion and I’ll agree.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,533
50,706
136
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/barr-press-conference

"Attorney General William Barr on Thursday affirmed that Special Counsel Robert Mueller found no evidence of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians during the 2016 presidential election, addressing reporters shortly before he is expected to release Mueller's report to Congress and to the public."

This needs to be put to rest already. It was a political witch hunt, no question about it. It was always built on the everybody gets a trophy crowd not being able to handle not getting their way.

This was built on an Australian ambassador alerting US counterintelligence forces that members of Trump's campaign appeared to be agents of a hostile foreign power.

America should investigate that 100% of the time and anyone arguing otherwise is bordering on treason. If you weren't so emotionally invested in Trump and instead thought about this logically you would agree.

You lefties should apologize.

We are still waiting for Trump to apologize for years of racist lies about Obama. Any ETA on that? You do agree he owes Obama and the country an apology for his shameful behavior, right?
 

VRAMdemon

Diamond Member
Aug 16, 2012
6,974
8,490
136
Barr no longer presents even the slightest pretense of not acting as White House defense counsel. This press conference probably makes the Congress's legal argument that they should see the full report much, much stronger. We'll see in the courts.

Even Foxnews agrees (Chris Wallace this morning): "The Attorney General seemed almost to be acting as the counselor for the defense, for the counselor for the president, rather than the Attorney General" ...
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,533
50,706
136
Barr no longer presents even the slightest pretense of not acting as White House defense counsel. This press conference probably makes the Congress's legal argument that they should see the full report much, much stronger. We'll see in the courts.

Even Foxnews agrees (Chris Wallace this morning): "The Attorney General seemed almost to be acting as the counselor for the defense, for the counselor for the president, rather than the Attorney General .

Congress has a slam dunk legal case for seeing the entire report. The Constitution empowers Congress to investigate and impeach the president for misconduct while in office. Therefore, Congress has the absolute right to all information relevant to making the determination if the president has engaged in misconduct and the executive branch has no power to withhold it.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,200
16,657
136
Barr no longer presents even the slightest pretense of not acting as White House defense counsel. This press conference probably makes the Congress's legal argument that they should see the full report much, much stronger. We'll see in the courts.

Even Foxnews agrees (Chris Wallace this morning): "The Attorney General seemed almost to be acting as the counselor for the defense, for the counselor for the president, rather than the Attorney General" ...

Chris Wallace is not the typical Fox guy. He attempts old school reporting.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
28,634
39,965
136
Barr is a damn disgrace, what a choad. He came into this having already forfeited his credibility, and since then has repeatedly given us cause to doubt his impartial position by echoing both partisan talking points and pure Trumpshit. This guy has no credibility.

Wtf is Mueller, isn't he supposed to be there?? This reeks to high heaven. Oh if only republicans could care about their democracy as much as they do what a gay, black Jewish actor did for pity and to increase his PR exposure. Sick republicans have no shame and an abundance of malignant hypocrisy.

I want to know what Adam Schiff thinks of the unredacted report. If he agrees with Barr, then I have no issues and eagerly await all the fun from SDNY to begin.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
24,918
9,177
136
I 100% agree with you! I also think that even if we accept Barr's interpretation of Trump's intent it doesn't hold up. He's basically trying to argue that because Trump was mad about Mueller's investigation he was entitled to obstruct it. This is laughably false.

He's also inserting his own judgement based on...what? What Trump/Giuliani told Barr? Where is the testimony related to Trump's feels? How would Mueller determine intent (or feels) based on a written response to questions?
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,333
136
The report that we're not allowed to see, which details the investigation that led to the conviction and imprisonment of the President's campaign chairman, clearly exonerates the President. Why can't these libtards see the obvious!
 

dyna

Senior member
Oct 20, 2006
813
61
91
Congress has a slam dunk legal case for seeing the entire report. The Constitution empowers Congress to investigate and impeach the president for misconduct while in office. Therefore, Congress has the absolute right to all information relevant to making the determination if the president has engaged in misconduct and the executive branch has no power to withhold it.

He is releasing a special version of the report to congress which is unredacted except for the grand jury info that he cannot legally release. So everybody should be happy.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
24,918
9,177
136
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/barr-press-conference

"Attorney General William Barr on Thursday affirmed that Special Counsel Robert Mueller found no evidence of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians during the 2016 presidential election, addressing reporters shortly before he is expected to release Mueller's report to Congress and to the public."


This needs to be put to rest already. It was a political witch hunt, no question about it. It was always built on the everybody gets a trophy crowd not being able to handle not getting their way. You lefties should apologize.

You're the perfect bootlicker...I see an AG job in your future.
 
Reactions: esquared
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |