dac7nco
Senior member
- Jun 7, 2009
- 756
- 0
- 0
OP, I game at just a bit over your resolution; I use 3x 1920x1200 in portrait, which is just ~.7MP larger. When ATI Cypress came out, I read Anandtech & HardOCP reviews and bought a pair of 5850s (I still have one). The 5850s worked well in a lot of games, but ATI/AMD (IMO) suffers from abysmally low minimum-FPS, especially when crossfired. I have a pair of nV cards now for Civ-5 and FSX (I don't play a lot of shooters, and I rarely have time to play anything), but they are MORE THAN enough to get by at close to 7MP. IMO nV has the better 3-monitor experience, but with AMD, you get it with 2-slots of real estate, instead of 4. This isn't said enough, but turning down IQ settings a bit in modern games doesn't really change the experience. If you're playing XXX on high vs. ultra, but on 3 monitors vs. 1, who's laughing now? If you can deal with the amateurish AMD drivers for (a small few) games, than AMD has the performance, price and memory crown. If you feel like paying 2/3ds of a month's rent for a pair of GTX580s, then there you go.
Daimon
As a side note, nV is a bastard when they design their low to mid-end cards. If you could tie together three mid-range GTS/GTX cards, this would be a moot point... I used to run GTX460SLI @ 2GB/Card, but I couldn't add a third... why wasn't there a second connector for Tri-SLI? - because that would've kept me away from buying 580SLI, at less cost (and more memory!).
Daimon
As a side note, nV is a bastard when they design their low to mid-end cards. If you could tie together three mid-range GTS/GTX cards, this would be a moot point... I used to run GTX460SLI @ 2GB/Card, but I couldn't add a third... why wasn't there a second connector for Tri-SLI? - because that would've kept me away from buying 580SLI, at less cost (and more memory!).