I'm actually more surprised at the Z28 doing so well. Has a circa 2006 engine, transmission and platform. GM threw a ton of expensive components into it which did do wonders.
The question is, will GM try to compete with the GT350R or actually focus on the higher selling trim levels. I would wager that more people would want something like the 1LE package on a lightly optioned SS. Why waste millions in R&D on a limited run model?
You really shouldn't be. It and the Viper ACR show that when it comes to the track, big engine, big sticky tires, big aero, big brakes, and decent suspension is just a recipe for success.
I wouldn't say more people would want, but more people could afford. But its a bragging situation. I doubt they spent millions on just the Z/28. A lot of what went into it had already been developed with the Z06/ZR1 Vettes and the rest shouldn't have taken that much money.
Will be interesting to see what Chevy does, as the Z/28 was a last hurrah for the previous car so curious if it'll be similar or if they'll introduce one earlier, and/or tweak it so that it is more affordable and has more mainstream appeal.
I'm shocked that Ford put in the effort and cost to do the flat plane V-8 for the GT350. But it's very appealing. It has extra cachet for enthusiasts, and it is definitely wowing people and the press so it seems like it can be worth it. I expect we'll see Chevy step up their game. I just hope they don't make a fuss over something stupid like the pass through bowtie like they did with the previous gen Z/28.
Another Mustang derivative. How many versions of it do they have for sale now?
Wait, are you complaining? This is common in the industry (actually in a lot of industries), so I'm not really sure why anyone would take issue with this.
There's really only 3 main models. The base Mustang which can have 3 different engines and two body styles (fastback or convertible), the GT350 which has a special version, and then the GT500 at some point.
I think he's talking about how you can easily tell that the actual diameter of the exhaust is nowhere near the size of the tips. I kinda get his point, and here, it looks weird because they have the beveled lips that they normally use to give the look of a larger exhaust without it actually being that large and looks nice, but they also have the thing that bugs me where you can tell the actual exhaust because there's a visible gap between the tip and the actual exhaust. Normally they'd bevel it all the way. But on cars now the exhaust tips are integrated into the fascia so they come off all as one piece so they don't have a perfect fit. Couple that with all the fake plastic mesh grille work that's getting added (not just to the front either) and it kinda bugs me. It looks ok, but when you can easily tell the actual grille opening size it just looks kinda bleh.