That's how most people drive an automatic. You put it in "drive" rather than L or 2.
In your other scenario you should really have stuck the transmission in 2 if it was bothering you...
It's also worth noting that the act of changing gears is what wears out the clutches and burns the oil.
If you are changing gears properly you shouldn't be killing the clutch.
If it were up to me, it would stay locked in top gear.
If you labour/lug the engine you aren't doing it any favours... That's one of the best ways to ruin a modern engine...
When left up to the automatic transmission, it shifts gears around 20 times per minute. Imagine yourself driving a standard and while driving you are constantly pushing and releasing the clutch. That is exactly what an automatic does, and that's why the transmission is broken. My Ford Tempo had the exact same problem and most of the old people around me thought it was perfectly normal for an automatic to not have a clue what gear it should be in.
Considering that the Corolla would have a slush box that is exactly what it doesn't do...
Also that's like one shift every three seconds...
Absolutely. Even the US government agrees that automatic transmissions generate fuckloads of heat and are going to burn the oil just by using the car as a daily driver. Forget my autotragic corolla and look at my old 1992 Ford Tempo:
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/compx2008f.jsp?year=1992&make=Ford&model=Tempo&hiddenField=Findacar
18mpg automatic vs 21mpg manual. Where do you think that extra fuel goes? It's heat in the transmission. Forget about how hot your exhaust system is, consider how hot the transmission is when 14% of the energy (3mpg out of 21) heats the transmission. That is why the ATF turns into black tar and that's why I had to sell my Tempo after 1 year of owning it.
Well done... assume the whole difference in fuel economy ends up in the transmission.
/facepalm
The Crayola is the same story. Right in the first post of this thread I said it was burning 9.6L/100km in combination city/highway driving. When I first got it, it would burn about 7.6L/100km. Where is that extra 26% fuel consumption going? Heat into the transmission. It's a million degree blast furnace inside that transmission. No wonder the thing is fucking up. That's the energy equivalent of holding a blow torch to the transmission.
The difference is 2 L of gasoline per
Hundred kilometres...
So that is 0.02L per km.
Wiki puts gasoline at 114,100 BTU per US gallon, so that is
(114100/3.7854)= ~30142 BTU/l
Since we used 0.02 litres that would be -
30142 x 0.02 = 602.84 BTU
My propane blowtorch is rated at 7.7 kW, so convert BTU to kW -
(602.84/~3414) = ~0.176 kW or 2.3% of the energy in a burner, under the worst possible situation (that all extra energy ends up in the transmission).
In reality the inefficiencies of the ICE mean that 66% of the extra energy will likely go out the exhaust...
Which reduces the extra to ~0.05 kW/km or 0.76% of the power of the blowtorch.
For comparison sake, my manual transmission Honda Civic had the same 7.6L/100km city gas mileage for the entire time I drove it, which was 3 years. The only reason I no longer have that car is because some kid t-boned it. After 50,000 miles (80,000km) it still had the original brake pads too. Honda = good. Toyota = proof that 2 atomic bombs was not enough.
Shawn... Honda and Toyota are both Japanese...
Fuel economy doesn't tell you the whole story. Manuals for most people get fairly good gas mileage but not great because people (the AT garage) love to run the engine at super high rpm all the time and refuse to upshift.
The only person in ATG that I have seen recently taking about "super high rpm" was you, when you were comparing a gas engine at 5700 rpm to a diesel at 2000 rpm...
Surprisingly that weight in the trunk has almost no effect on gas mileage. The Civic didn't take a hit either. Of course that should be expected since a Corolla and a Camry get almost the same highway mileage despite one weighing 500 pounds more than the other in addition to having ~40% more horsepower.
Toyota: making it stop because the piece of shit automatic transmission doesn't work
about the weight thing:
Toyota Camry - 33mpg highway - 3263 pound car
Toyota Corolla - 35mpg highway - 2734 pound car
Oh noes!!! Adding 500 pounds of weight to the car drops the gas mileage by almost 6%!!! Shit! (35-33)/35 * 100 = 5.7%
You do realise why DBZ was laughing don't you?
By the way thanks for disproving your own point (bold).
This thread is awesome :thumbsup: