I don't feel like riding the clutch as it gets exhausting and tiring.
A motorcycle will be different.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...
*breathes*
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...
OK, back under control now. I've been riding motorcycles for the better part of two decades now. Even on bikes with "easy" clutches it gets really tiring really fast if you're in a traffic jam. It's nothing that can't be put up with, but it's certainly no easier than the extremely light clutch in an econobox like your Civic.
If I'm in a traffic jam on my motorcycles for a long time (>15 minutes) my hand will start to cramp up a little because there just aren't a lot of situations where you have to hold a fist for 15 minutes straight. In all honesty, the stiff clutch in my 944 Turbo is less hassle than the light clutch on my old Honda motorcycle in heavy traffic.
With the car I can at least usually idle along in 1st without riding the clutch at all in between times I have to stop. The motorcycle, with much less low-end torque, needs revs and slipping the clutch so the clutch hand never gets a break.
You're making bad assumptions here because you're not experienced with motorcycles.
When the repairs are more than the value of the car fully repaired, it ain't worth it.
Wrong. Just ridiculously wrong.
When the repairs are more than the cost of a reliable equivalent replacement vehicle, they're not worth it.
As long as the repairs are cheaper than buying an equivalent (but reliable) replacement vehicle, it is better to do the repairs.
Clean retail for a 2000 Civic EX Sedan with a manual transmission and 188,000 miles is $3,900 according to NADA, so you should be able to buy a reliable version of your same car for $3,900. Subtract $100 for the coupe's value. Assuming that bringing everything (including A/C) back into working order will cost less than about $3,800, it makes more financial sense to do the repairs.
ZV