My Prediction - Hillary

[TastesLikeChicken]

I have correctly predicted every single elected president since Nixon so my track record is solid in that regard. As a member of this forum my predictions for president have always come true (and you are welcome to check my posting history for those predictions, though they don't equate to my personal voting record since I never voted for GW Bush).

Hillary will win.

I can't stand her. I won't vote for her (or Trump). A woman that has a bigger dick than her husband is, to me personally, repugnant. But she will win for whatever that is worth because Trump is even a bigger schmuck than Billary.

You heard it here. Bank on it.

 

[yllus]

A woman that has a bigger dick than her husband is, to me personally, repugnant.

I'm curious as to what you mean by this. I believe that you consider yourself a conservative, but I think this kind of thinking/saying needs to be retired, even in right-leaning circles. Ms. Clinton might not be your ideal candidate for president, but there's nothing repugnant about a woman being as ambitious and (often) duplicitous as any male politician at that level.

 

[Moonbeam]

I'm curious as to what you mean by this. I believe that you consider yourself a conservative, but I think this kind of thinking/saying needs to be retired, even in right-leaning circles. Ms. Clinton might not be your ideal candidate for president, but there's nothing repugnant about a woman being as ambitious and (often) duplicitous as any male politician at that level.

What he means is that he is focused on dick size because he experiences feelings of sexual insecurity. Insecurity is an outward face of inward self hate and such aggression creates a hatred of women because, unconsciously, he experiences women as the cause of his insecurity. A powerful woman makes his dick shrink in his imagination. It's sad to see people suffer because they are emotionally ignorant of what motivates them.

 

[sportage]

Well then. Guess we can all just stay home.

 

[compuwiz1]

The convention should be interesting, since Wasserman-Shultz won't be allowed to speak.

 

[Sinsear]

No convention is interesting; the fact that they've gone into round the clock coverage of them is ridiculous.

 

[DrDoug]

I had to post to say that seeing this made me laugh...

My Prediction- Hillary
TastesLikeChicken

She does? :biggrin:

 

[compuwiz1]

I had to post to say that seeing this made me laugh...

My Prediction- Hillary
TastesLikeChicken

She does? :biggrin:

Thought the same thing! lol

 

[brycejones]

So from this we learned the op is really afraid of ambitious women. He needs his real America of 1945 back or he feels emasculated.

 

[Grooveriding]

This is an easy prediction to make. Trump won't be able to expand his base because of how narrowly he defined perceptions of him. If all he had to do was get the vote of insecure white men, he'd be good. But they are a minority, so his chances of winning are slim to none. Doesn't matter how many times he trots out his daughter to say the things he can't, because it would add to his list of flip flops and lies, people still will be voting for him and he's annexed himself into a hole.

 

[bshole]

I have correctly predicted every single elected president since Nixon so my track record is solid in that regard. As a member of this forum my predictions for president have always come true (and you are welcome to check my posting history for those predictions, though they don't equate to my personal voting record since I never voted for GW Bush).

Hillary will win.

I can't stand her. I won't vote for her (or Trump). A woman that has a bigger dick than her husband is, to me personally, repugnant. But she will win for whatever that is worth because Trump is even a bigger schmuck than Billary.

You heard it here. Bank on it.

That is a prediction? Jesus Christ. Everybody on the planet knows Trump has a 0% chance in this election. I am considering putting a huge bet on this election. Does anybody know a legit site that you can gamble on this? I would consider it the easiest money I ever made.

 

[Strk]

That is a prediction? Jesus Christ. Everybody on the planet knows Trump has a 0% chance in this election. I am considering putting a huge bet on this election. Does anybody know a legit site that you can gamble on this? I would consider it the easiest money I ever made.

Except he doesn't have a 0% chance. Both candidates have a majority disapproval rating. That is a formula for low turnout and increased third party votes. I see whomever wins, winning with a low percentage (40-43%)

 

[sontakke]

Both candidates have a majority disapproval rating.

I just don't get this talking point parroted by everybody. Both the candidates got record number of primary votes. Previous primary winners did NOT get these many votes.

 

[Kwatt]

I am not voting for either.

Of course Hillary will win. She has the most money backing. The "status quo" will be maintained.

Trump would be a disrupter. And probably not in a good way.

.

 

[Moonbeam]

That is a prediction? Jesus Christ. Everybody on the planet knows Trump has a 0% chance in this election. I am considering putting a huge bet on this election. Does anybody know a legit site that you can gamble on this? I would consider it the easiest money I ever made.

So true, just like he had zero chance to win the nomination. Does it never occur to you that you have a need to feel certain of everything in order not to feel pain. Millions of people are going to vote for Trump for the same reasons.

And remember, information about your inner state isn't an insult to make you hurt, but the door to freedom from it. Everything you fear has already happened. There is nothing there but the fear itself.

 

[FrankRamiro]

Well then. Guess we can all just stay home.

Luckily we don't have Communist party. otherwise who stays home votes for Communists,cause all the Communists go to vote.

 

[Blue_Max]

I predict she'll get 80-90% of the female vote because vagina. No other reason.

If men don't want this, they'll have to make extra effort to go to the polls.

 

[flexy]

Communist Party, say in the former Soviet Union or former Eastern Germany held "fake" elections where the nominee was already determined in advance.

So, how is this any different from the so called "Democratic" National Convention who CLEARLY (as pointed out for a long time already) favors one candidate over the other, and actually goes through efforts so that one candidate (Sanders) cannot win?

ANSWER: THIS IS NOT DIFFERENT AT ALL

But keep yourself in the comforting belief that we're in a "democracy" and that your vote counts.

 

[Moonbeam]

I predict she'll get 80-90% of the female vote because vagina. No other reason.

If men don't want this, they'll have to make extra effort to go to the polls.

Not men. Traumatized boys who project their own hate of their own testicles on women. Wish you had a loving Mother.

 

[Blue_Max]

Not men. Traumatized boys who project their own hate of their own testicles on women. Wish you had a loving Mother.

....aaaand that's the methodology of how she'll get her votes. In addition to the proven phenomenon of female own-group preference, if you don't vote for her you're "hating women" and "betraying women" and "evil male scum" etc.

Sony's Ghostbusters campaign all over again.

 

[Muse]

What he means is that he is focused on dick size because he experiences feelings of sexual insecurity. Insecurity is an outward face of inward self hate and such aggression creates a hatred of women because, unconsciously, he experiences women as the cause of his insecurity. A powerful woman makes his dick shrink in his imagination. It's sad to see people suffer because they are emotionally ignorant of what motivates them.

I approve of this message.

Not men. Traumatized boys who project their own hate of their own testicles on women. Wish you had a loving Mother.

And dig, a loving mother goes a long way in insuring your happiness in this world.

I know, we're getting OT here, but such ideas, though platitudinous, are quite worthy of repetition and emphasis.

 

[Moonbeam]

....aaaand that's the methodology of how she'll get her votes. In addition to the proven phenomenon of female own-group preference, if you don't vote for her you're "hating women" and "betraying women" and "evil male scum" etc.

Sony's Ghostbusters campaign all over again.

Hehehe. I have been saying I'm voting for Trump because the Democrats picked the wrong candidate, that they chose race and gender politics over saving the country from the wealthy. But the fact that the US, Democrats mostly, seems hell bent on electing a women in part just because she is a woman doesn't make my nuts fall off. People see the issues differently than I do. Who the fuck cares why people will vote for Clinton if she's better than Trump. Who the fuck cares if some men are emasculated. Your insane fear reaction to that reality screams that is what has happened to you, your tantrum like raging proof in the pudding. Have some god damned self respect. You have become a raging nut case.

So tell me, how do you feel about your Mother, or did your Dad maybe fear you're gay? Whatever happened doesn't matter because becoming conscious of your past will undefined you and set you free.

 

[feralkid]

Luckily we don't have Communist party. otherwise who stays home votes for Communists,cause all the Communists go to vote.

Very good, Louis.

 

[TheGardener]

Goldman Sachs knows who is going to win. And they are placing very large bets on the election.

 

[Blue_Max]

Your insane fear reaction to that reality screams that is what has happened to you, your tantrum like raging proof in the pudding. Have some god damned self respect. You have become a raging nut case.

So tell me, how do you feel about your Mother, or did your Dad maybe fear you're gay? Whatever happened doesn't matter because becoming conscious of your past will undefined you and set you free.

No fear. No tantrums. No raging. No lack of self-respect. No "nut case". No homosexuality (or fear therof). And my mother is none of your business.

You're simply wrong about me across the board and doing what progressives always do - smear with a personal attack rather than address the issue at hand.

I predict that the majority of women will vote for Clinton simply because she's a woman. Nothing more, nothing less. Not all, but the majority. Own-gender preference is a thing, sorry if science offends you.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15491274
http://www.apa.org/monitor/dec04/women.aspx

Now do you have a REAL rebuttal or just more personal insults about my testicles?