Originally posted by: Gillbot
I have no Q9450 to compare to but i'll say ANY quad is a pain to overclock unless you really like tweaking settings until you are blue faced.
^^ I'm with that. Lotsa patience needed for setting 1 of these up.
Larry
Originally posted by: Gillbot
I have no Q9450 to compare to but i'll say ANY quad is a pain to overclock unless you really like tweaking settings until you are blue faced.
Originally posted by: aigomorla
ROFL Gill.
Lar you know dave aka Movieman on XS?
Im gonna have a dual quad bash out with him soon. ROFL.
Gill i know i think i might have bite more then i can chew.
E0's Quads on 10x multi = My butt served on a red carpet.
:T
Originally posted by: Katiephil
Thought I would try a Q9450 today this is what i got:
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=407280
OCCT stable 4 hours
Originally posted by: Katiephil
Thought I would try a Q9450 today this is what i got:
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=407280
OCCT stable 4 hours
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
I just got done taking my 9450 to 3.4 GHz (I know, I know but I run a 780i board w/4x2 GB DIMMs... IMO I'm lucky to get that.). IntelBurnTest was most helpful in identifying voltage issues in a timely fashion (unlike Prime which takes forever). It could save you hours & hours of Prime time.
Viper GTS
Originally posted by: Gillbot
I'm afraid to run linpack. I don't wanna start at square one with a failed test.
Originally posted by: Big Lar
ps.. The guy who has the other chip like this is at 4ghz but not stable, think I got a lucky chip here.