dank69
Lifer
- Oct 6, 2009
- 35,921
- 30,022
- 136
That is way too common sense for people here.my views are that unless it harms someone else you should be able to do whatever you want.
That is way too common sense for people here.my views are that unless it harms someone else you should be able to do whatever you want.
You should just jerk off instead of thinking about nonsense such as this.
I'm not just being a dismissive asshole, either. Take your "Christian" morals and shove them. We don't need your approval to do anything. But even if you ignore that angle, your "solution" makes zero sense. You won't get "Christian" buy in, for starters. "Christians" aren't going to all of a sudden accept fags just because you make divorce laws more strict.
I mean, FFS morals aren't a fucking negotiation. If you think they are you are doing it wrong.
my views are that unless it harms someone else you should be able to do whatever you want.
That is way too common sense for people here.
I'm addressing the OP, not your twisted misogynistic ramblings.So your argument is that only Christians believe marriage is anything beyond a means to extort benefits from the government?
I'm addressing the OP, not your twisted misogynistic ramblings.
How does it hurt you? The fraction of a cent of your taxes that goes to feed her kids? Grow the fuck up.Funny that when I try to apply this to poor single mothers having kids they cannot feed everyone gets all butt hurt about it.
Why do you lack common sense?
How does it hurt you? The fraction of a cent of your taxes that goes to feed her kids? Grow the fuck up.
I'm talking about the fraction of a cent that goes to her specifically. This is way off topic anyway, but keep beating the dead horse.You are full of crap
Food stamps alone I believe is around ~75b/3500b budget. Which means that 2% of all federal income tax goes to food stamps alone. And that is understating it because I am too lazy to back out SS and medicare.
Not to mention that even you admit I am harmed. We are just debating the extent of the harm
And we have no started discussing the increased crime rate of children from poor single mothers.
Or the harm caused to the children of women choosing to have a child without a father.
I'm talking about the fraction of a cent that goes to her specifically. This is way off topic anyway, but keep beating the dead horse.
You approve of people doing whatever they want so long as it fits with your ideology.
Banks are people, my friend.Well by your retarded argument bank robbery should be legal.
After all no one is really harmed. They only get fractions of a cent from everyone.
The only difference is that single mothers are women and bank robbers are men.
Which is the real truth. You approve of people doing whatever they want so long as it fits with your ideology.
.. says the pot to the kettle.
How is that any different than liberals?
I assume every group wants to pass laws consistent with their values/ideology. Why are liberals always so shocked by this?
Banks are people, my friend.
I think I already addressed that.
Only if you include yourself. You referenced groups of people, and addressed your comment (the one I quoted) to a specific person. Unless you're including yourself.. as another specific person.. you're not addressing anything.
Our planet and our country. Happens thousands of times a day(week?)
To those opposed to my very well though out plan (while I was washing out my coffee pot at 4 am): What is your definition of marriage? If its not the joining of two people into one, then what is it?
I have no problem with passing laws limiting people's behavior consistent with my ideology/values.
Why don't you just come up with your own prenups instead of forcing your morality on everyone else?
If Christians were really all that concerned about divorce they would make their own harsh prenups instead of trying to get the govt to fix your marriages.
Aren't you the same guys that also complain about big govt liberals taking away freedoms? Govt is evil oppressors for trying to tax healthcare freeloaders, but the govt should be forcing you to stay married to some drunken asshat gambler who refuses to get a job.
Exactly.. so your "You approve of people doing whatever they want so long as it fits with your ideology." statement to dank69 applies to you as well.
Ok, lets look further at marital rape.
(1) The law is unenforceable. All you have is the woman's word. Why have laws that are completely unenforceable?
(2) Why do you want the government in people's bedrooms
(3) How do you justify prohibitions of adultery in marriage if the wife is denying the husband sex.
(4) Assuming that women really do want sex as much as men why is it necessary?
Marriage is a contract that is voluntarily entered into.
One obvious job of the government is enforcing contracts.
I wonder if you would still agree with 'no rape in marriage' if you got surprise buttsex via strap on from your wife.
So in your world how is marriage any different than having a live in bf/gf?
Marriage is a contract that is voluntarily entered into.
One obvious job of the government is enforcing contracts.
I enter into many contracts professionally that simply require two weeks notice to void. No penalty.
I enter into many contracts professionally that simply require two weeks notice to void. No penalty.