My view on Windows 8 and the history of Microsoft OS

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Mem

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
21,476
13
81
windows 8 is FAIL
Windows Server 2012 is FAIL.
(metro dashboard is FAIL.)

Do you know how long it takes a new user to figure out where the shutdown button is?
I can tell you, its take about 10-15 min for someone new to figure out how to shut down on windows 8 on average.
Its also kinda funny to watch as they struggle looking for the shutdown button.

Some of my IT friends on the first time got annoyed that they couldn't find it so they just held down the power button instead.

Its a no brainer everyone is forcing the CEO of microsoft to retire.
http://news.yahoo.com/microsoft-ceo-steve-ballmer-pushed-retire-early-231538569.html
And it wasnt a nice ask either... it was a "GTFO"...
Meaning they were gonna fire him, if he didnt accept retirement.
^ that should tell u the success to windows 8 and server 2012, and all the other monkey stuff Microsoft has been doing lately.

He has completely destoryed what microsoft was in the past 3 yrs with windows 8.
He split up the community big time telling the hobbiest / professionals either we suck up to change or leave.
So most professionals said OK, we'll LEAVE....

They have also destroyed a gateway for developers to expand by getting rid of technet.

The company is an entire mess... I and many others have started putting up life rafts to get away from microsoft....
If possible i expect to move off microsoft on all my systems minus my gaming system by next april.

Windows 8... u figure of 75% of the audience beg'd microsoft for a start button, they would say SORRY, OK we'll put it back.
No instead they said go suck it up... or leave... but u cant cuz all the laptops u can buy outside mac's are forced with windows 8.
Hence your forced to use a third party ap, for a primary function which was built on windows that we were literally grown up on.
(well now u can download a microsoft ap to fix this... )

Sigh microsoft... I hope the new CEO FIXES a lot of stuff... especially things like TECHNET... and also puts windows8 under the rug quickly like they did with windows ME.
Which i felt was another sorry excuse for an OS...

<my rant with microsoft.... but im glad they themselves realize something is wrong and is forcing the CEO to take the walk... now they can try to recover...>



this is what they hopped for instead its not what happening.
IT dont even bother with the dashboard... they all HATE windows server 2012 mostly.
They just BMC into the machine and go around the metro dashboard madness.
what is so good about windows 8 over 7?
The majority of us speed users have SSD's. Even the medium tier desktop setups now use SSD's.
Whats the difference in bootup from windows 8 and windows 7 with SSD?

What is so special about windows 8, that windows 7 cant do with today's hardware?

I feel if it takes a new user more then 10 seconds to figure out how to shutdown the machine... the OS FAILED to begin with.


IT users should know how to use the OS in question regardless of OS,if not they should get training or have better staff it's not rocket science,I guess the days of employees being adaptable and flexible have gone and they have to be spoon feed even after training ,they are being paid to do the job with the tools the company gives them.

Stick shutdown on taskbar or Win+x menu that's what I did,hate to say it but what's special about Win7 ie improved rehash of Vista which is improved rehash of XP which is improved rehash of 98 etc ....Win8 is a new direction ie hybrid OS with some new ideas and improvements ,no doubt Win9 will be an improved rehash version of Win8 and cycle continues yet some people will still bitch and moan rather then embrace and the learn the OS in question.

I'll book my front seat for Win9,10,11 because you know people are going to complain about something.
 
Last edited:

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
33,574
7,637
136
I agree, I also like 8 over 7. The problem is it's not just AT, it pretty much everywhere. How do you change people's minds when they are already made up?

Microsoft already answered that problem with great success. When it came to Windows Vista they introduced Windows 7. Windows 8 needs Windows 9.
 

smakme7757

Golden Member
Nov 20, 2010
1,487
1
81
I've been trying that leaked RTM build and i must admit I feel like I'm selling my soul with it.

As an example.

When you install Dropbox on Your system you gain a new folder in Windows Explorer. It's easy to navigate, it's easy to use.

On all other versions of Windows you can install a similar piece of software which gives you the same "Dropbox" experience With Skydrive. An extra folder in Windows Explorer.

I liked that!

Now in Windows 8.1 you cannot even download the the software. You are forced to use the Skydrive App. In addition Skydrive is so tightly Integrated into the OS you now have the following options in the settings pane - Default settings, unless you turn them off:


  • Save Documents to Skydrive by default
  • Upload Pictures and videos
  • Sync settings, wifi passwords app password ect...
  • Backup settings
Why can't i choose if i want to use the Skydrive App or Skydrive through Windows Explorer?

I want to stay current, but I don't want to be locked into the Microsoft ecosystem and i certainly don't want everything digital about me in the cloud by default.

Also, to use Skydrive at all on 8.1 you HAVE to be using a Microsoft Account and not an offline local account. Windows 8 was treading a very thin line, but I feel Windows 8.1 is way too "Integrated" for my liking.

Obviously at some point in time I'll be forced to move from Windows 8 to Windows 9/10/11, but it's a shame.

We are losing Choice which is even more important now than it was 10 years ago.

I'm not opposed to moving to Linux, but Windows is the compatibility king and i enjoy working With it.

I'll be sticking to Windows 8
 
Last edited:

Sheep221

Golden Member
Oct 28, 2012
1,843
27
81
IT users should know how to use the OS in question regardless of OS,if not they should get training or have better staff it's not rocket science,I guess the days of employees being adaptable and flexible have gone and they have to be spoon feed even after training ,they are being paid to do the job with the tools the company gives them.

Stick shutdown on taskbar or Win+x menu that's what I did,hate to say it but what's special about Win7 ie improved rehash of Vista which is improved rehash of XP which is improved rehash of 98 etc ....Win8 is a new direction ie hybrid OS with some new ideas and improvements ,no doubt Win9 will be an improved rehash version of Win8 and cycle continues yet some people will still bitch and moan rather then embrace and the learn the OS in question.

I'll book my front seat for Win9,10,11 because you know people are going to complain about something.
It's true that some users are more adaptive than others but that doesn't void the fact that Win8 has pretty much dysfunctional interface and that it technically does not have advantage over previous versions.
I'm curious why they didn't leave any options to just disable the new features. Windows 7 featured many changes too, but were reversible for those who didn't like it. That would be enough to do for windows 8 to not be complete disaster.
 

escrow4

Diamond Member
Feb 4, 2013
3,339
122
106
7 is old and tired now compared to Win 8. Plus:

- 8 has vastly improved network/local file copying (pause, resume, intelligent file replacement)

- 8 has native .iso support, right click and mount

- 8 has native USB 3 support and the twitchiness looks to be solved in 8.1

- 8 is noticeable faster and slicker in day to day usage, especially with an SSD, but also on a HDD

- 8 supports Fast Boot, my laptop and tablet boot in under 5 seconds, desktop in under 10

- 8 has slightly better security in the kernel over 7, and vastly improved over XP.

- 8 of all the Windows OS's has been the most stable, 7 was great, but 8 is really really great. This is based, as below, if you have modern hardware with modern drivers, not some old crap from 1995.

I'm running 8 on all my systems now - gaming box, work box, tablet, and laptop. All are running modern hardware with native 8 drivers and all work flawlessly. All will soon be clean installed or upgraded to 8.1, and all except for the gaming box run a Microsoft account.
 

dderolph

Senior member
Mar 14, 2004
619
0
0
windows 8 is good for a touch interface, but I will not be using windows 8 on a desktop. It's barely acceptable on a laptop.
I bought a laptop with Win 8 in early March 2013, about 6 months ago. I'm wondering why you say it's "barely acceptable on a laptop." My laptop does not have a touch screen but a mouse works quite well for navigating the Start screen. Using the mouse wheel quickly scrolls the tiles on the Start screen.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,967
19
81
The Start button is most people's aggravation.

StartIsBack is excellent (I used the freebie one out there as well and found it also good) and cheap.

I like Windows 8 now. I don't care for Metro and the like, but it seems snappy and robust.
 

desura

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2013
4,627
129
101
I was going to make a thread about this topic...

But I spent some time getting to learn Win8's Metro interface. The learning curve is about on par with what I encountered going from WIndows to Mac OSX.

But the ideas are pretty solid if you ask me. I like it more than the mac. It is faster and with better and more useful full-screen view.
 

FalseChristian

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2002
3,322
0
71
OK. Let's get to the REAL question: can we use ClassicShell just like in Windows7 or our we stuck with this lousy Metro interface. Can we make it look and act like Windows 7 after applying ClassicShell? If the answer is yes than what's the problem? If the answer is no I'll be using Windows 7 and ClassicShell for the rest of my life!
 

Underclocked

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,041
0
76
Classic Shell works nicely. smakme7757, did you do your install of 8.1 while connected to the internet? If so, you will have had to log in to a Microsoft account. If you install it while offline, you are able to create a normal user account. You might try installing in that manner and turning off the skydrive default settings if they are even presented (I don't recall whether they were or not - but don't believe so).

And you might find this page useful (not related) http://www.win-raid.com/t137f38-Tip-Installation-of-NET-Framework-onto-Win-RTM.html
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,967
19
81
OK. Let's get to the REAL question: can we use ClassicShell just like in Windows7 or our we stuck with this lousy Metro interface. Can we make it look and act like Windows 7 after applying ClassicShell? If the answer is yes than what's the problem? If the answer is no I'll be using Windows 7 and ClassicShell for the rest of my life!

It works. It had issues, StartIsBack supposedly is the 100% solution for a very low cost.

I used ClassicShell...never had issues. I like StartIsBack's interface more. I think it was like $8 to cover my 5 Windows 8 machines.
 

thescreensavers

Diamond Member
Aug 3, 2005
9,930
2
81
Waiting for 8.1, I am on 7 and tried 8 for a little while did not like it but I want to give W8 another shot. Software has matured a bit and I have used it on my GF's new Laptop without too much issue( start menu app installed of course) .

I really like the logon screen in W8

When 8.1 comes out Ill sometime get around to reformatting. Just a little of a pain with my SSD+HDD combo I got.
 

capeconsultant

Senior member
Aug 10, 2005
454
0
0
I don't use it, but when I was trialing it, I was rather fond of the start screen. What I don't like is hidden triggers on the screen, a la start corner, and charms bar. That's piss poor design, and I don't like it on any desktop environment. Allowing the user to enable it is fine, but by default, triggers should be visible.

You speak the truth. I HATE it when crap pops up when I get near a corner. It really seems as if the UI team was on acid for Windows 8. Really.

Sitting around a table, LAUGHING, "Let's change EVERYTHING so the bastards have NO clue what to do! Yeah,that's the ticket!"

I seriously think that they have figured out that NEGATIVE publicity is somehow cheaper than positive publicity, (or possibly cheaper AND more effective) and do more or less whatever they want. Learning from past lessons does not seem to be a part of Microsoft.
 

colonelciller

Senior member
Sep 29, 2012
915
0
0
The NSA has a backdoor because they can get the keys from MS. MS has already been complicit in compromising the security of their products to please the government. It's foolish to think they'd draw the line at TPM keys. Assuming they did take an ethical stand(I guess there's a first time for everything), they can be compelled to hand the keys over, and not disclose it to anyone.

There's a nice fat section at Wikipedia outlining the problems with TC. We're beyond trust at this point. It's been proven that technology not controlled by the user will be used against them. Any other stance is just whistling past the graveyard.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_computing#Criticism

wow, "Trusted Computing" (TC) certainly should never be trusted by anyone. It looks like big brother's wet dream mixed with a subtle (slimy) corporate scheme to hard-lock everyone into the Windows ecosystem.

People, please read that TC article on wikipedia... that untrustable computing feature is reason enough to leave windows behind forever and switch to a free software platform.

Enough is enough.
 

Remobz

Platinum Member
Jun 9, 2005
2,563
37
91
7 is old and tired now compared to Win 8. Plus:

- 8 has vastly improved network/local file copying (pause, resume, intelligent file replacement)

- 8 has native .iso support, right click and mount

- 8 has native USB 3 support and the twitchiness looks to be solved in 8.1

- 8 is noticeable faster and slicker in day to day usage, especially with an SSD, but also on a HDD

- 8 supports Fast Boot, my laptop and tablet boot in under 5 seconds, desktop in under 10

- 8 has slightly better security in the kernel over 7, and vastly improved over XP.

- 8 of all the Windows OS's has been the most stable, 7 was great, but 8 is really really great. This is based, as below, if you have modern hardware with modern drivers, not some old crap from 1995.

I'm running 8 on all my systems now - gaming box, work box, tablet, and laptop. All are running modern hardware with native 8 drivers and all work flawlessly. All will soon be clean installed or upgraded to 8.1, and all except for the gaming box run a Microsoft account.

I know people still running windows xp pro for a small business operation.

I see no reason why Windows 7 would not handle the job for awhile if installed this year.
 

Cerb

Elite Member
Aug 26, 2000
17,484
33
86
The Start button is most people's aggravation.
And having to go into and out of Metro all the damn time, because MS was retarded[1]. And no, installing another 3rd party utility does not do the job, because these are not my computers.

[1] Example: Devices. Metro's Devices shows spare displays, and nothing else. Go to Settings, and then Devices, and you get the devices+printers list (2 places named Devices, one of which I still haven't figured out the purpose of, because I've never seen anything but spare video outputs in it). Want to add a network printer, though? Oh, sorry, you're going to have to go to the old Control Panel, to the old add wizard, then go back to Metro to make sure it worked, because undoubtedly that's where you get to the program they need. And, if you click on the little sentence about not finding what you're looking for, which is right where something similar is on the old wizard, it just brings up help (I even know not to do it, but the dialogs are so similar, that habit kicks in when network discovery fails ), instead of options to point to the device you need. Why not just make the new add a device wizard have all the functionality of the old device and old printer add wizards, and then get rid of the old one?

Half-assed duplication of interfaces like that is confusing, especially to normal users, and quite simply retarded, on MS' part, showing they did pretty much zero research, or user testing, on the matter. They should have either made Metro 100% optional, or done a true merging of new/tablet and old/desktop UIs, as far as the user could see (a new under the hood infrastructure was a good idea, and it would have let them streamline parts, but it needed to work side by side with the old one). Oh, and try explaining what's different between Internet Explorer and Internet Explorer, to non-techies (you have to start with the explanation of what a web browser is, and they're both installed, from MS, and named IE...I've found it close to impossible).

Yes, I have to deal with this fairly regularly, why do you ask?
 
Last edited:

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,967
19
81
And having to go into and out of Metro all the damn time, because MS was retarded[1]. And no, installing another 3rd party utility does not do the job, because these are not my computers.

Example: Devices. Metro's Devices shows spare displays, and nothing else. Go to Settings, and then Devices, and you get the devices+printers list (2 places named Devices, one of which I still haven't figured out the purpose of, because I've never seen anything but spare video outputs in it). Want to add a network printer, though? Oh, sorry, you're going to have to go to the old Control Panel, to the old add wizard, then go back to Metro to make sure it worked, because undoubtedly that's where you get to the program they need. And, if you click on the little sentence about not finding what you're looking for, which is right where something similar is on the old wizard, it just brings up help (I even know not to do it, but the dialogs are so similar, that habit kicks in when network discovery fails ), instead of options to point to the device you need. Why not just make the new add a device wizard have all the functionality of the old device and old printer add wizards, and then get rid of the old one?

Half-assed duplication of interfaces like that is confusing, especially to normal users, and quite simply retarded, on MS' part, showing they did pretty much zero research, or user testing, on the matter. They should have either made Metro 100% optional, or done a true merging of new/tablet and old/desktop UIs, as far as the user could see (a new under the hood infrastructure was a good idea, and it would have let them streamline parts, but it needed to work side by side with the old one). Oh, and try explaining what's different between Internet Explorer and Internet Explorer, to non-techies (you have to start with the explanation of what a web browser is, and they're both installed, from MS, and named IE...I've found it close to impossible).

Yes, I have to deal with this fairly regularly, why do you ask?

I'd say at the end of the day, it wasn't your call. Enjoy having a job...work up that ladder and get into a deciding role.

I worked in this kind of thing in the past. I quickly got out of it.
 

Cerb

Elite Member
Aug 26, 2000
17,484
33
86
I'd say at the end of the day, it wasn't your call.
Way to deflect. Bravo. Regardless of the chances of that being astronomically low (that's a whole different ladder, and I'll be happy staying far away from it--I don't own a tie, I don't own a sportscoat, and I like it that way), none of that makes Windows 8's UI decisions any less retarded.

Enjoy having a job
I do, and one that doesn't leave me on my ass all day (if I get going before work, and have to sit all day, I go crazy; if I don't, then I have no energy at night or on the weekend; fuck that noise). I don't whine about it on the forums, but I was a regular old recession statistic for quite awhile, and then made a prospects-reducing career change along the way, from programming to general IT, after a revelatory short-term gig.

work up that ladder and get into a deciding role.
So someone else can deal with the crap, instead of the crap not being there in the first place? Someone will have to deal with it, as it is now. Non-employees must bring their own. Even if I were to work up to a point of having some say about that, that's the right decision, at least for anything they carry home with them. What are they likely to purchase? Exactly. So, again, that makes Windows 8's UI decisions no less retarded, which was the point.

I worked in this kind of thing in the past. I quickly got out of it.
The job is actually nice (I'm moving around a lot, dealing with people, there's some travel, my boss is cool, most of the people I work around/for are cool, the commute is short, it's in a good location for midday walks in lieu of going out to eat--I bring my lunch a lot, and eat it in between clicking yes/next, sometimes--etc.), and getting out of it quickly would be bad, both personally and professionally. I do hope it becomes something more, but it would be best for me to get out of it slowly.
 

beginner99

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2009
5,223
1,598
136
I don't use keyboard shortcuts on Win8 and have no productivity issues,as to office workers they get paid to use the tools the company gives them ,end of the day Win8 is not hard to adjust too unless the office workers are morans,sure it has some changes and small learning curve but what happened to office workers being adaptable etc within the office environment.

I don't know about you but that is an important asset/skill that most employers look for,guess Win8 is too much for them right?

Also with respect Win8 can behave like Win7 for the most part ,if you can't figure that out you are doing it all wrong.


Well lucky for me our IT is slower than a snail and we just went from XP to 7 when 8 came out. So it's almost 100% certain we will never use 8 or 8.1 and there is hope.

Win 8 is why people have been making jokes about MS for the last 30 years.

In linux world you can easily change the whole UI. You can get default Ubuntu with unity UI or Kubuntu with KDE or Lubuntu with LXDE and so forth. The fact that you can't choose the UI in Win 8 either tells me it's designed liek crap or deliberate to force a stupid UI on every windows user that "condition" him for using stupid windows phones. Considering it's MS, it's probably both.

Now Cerb described it perfectly whats wrong with the whole thing. Some things now have to be done in a modern ui style menu and others in the old control panel and often you have to switch constantly. This is just wrong. Since modern UI is a dumb-down kiddie interface it's fine if it only contains a subset of all options. However this does not mean that the options in there should be removed from the control panel. then it's not a plain subset anymore.

In a simple way it should be possible to sue a PC with never ever having to use modern UI. Leave it up to the user. There is no inherent technical reason why this is not possible (else there would not be 3rd party start menu apps as example). When I'm in desktop mode I should never for some random setting be moved over to modern ui. No, when I'm in desktop mode modern ui should never be noticeable unless I want to use it.

The thing is Win 8 does nto have a hybrid UI, the UI is a chimera. Eg. the different UIs are randomly mixed and you constantly and unexpectedly get transferred from one to the other. It should be the users choice, always which UI to use and it should then be consistent!

What this why the chimeric Win 8 UI sucks:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTYet-qf1jo

It breaks all known UI design guidelines.
 

Imaginer

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 1999
8,076
1
0
It breaks all known UI design guidelines.

I have no issues.

I have no problem with distinguishing modern and desktop, being able to recognize as such, being able to work in both environments.

And in my opinion, it did not matter for me. If you want my point of view about this whole thing, some people want to watch the Empire fall, only for another to take its place.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,967
19
81
Way to deflect. Bravo. Regardless of the chances of that being astronomically low (that's a whole different ladder, and I'll be happy staying far away from it--I don't own a tie, I don't own a sportscoat, and I like it that way), none of that makes Windows 8's UI decisions any less retarded.

I do, and one that doesn't leave me on my ass all day (if I get going before work, and have to sit all day, I go crazy; if I don't, then I have no energy at night or on the weekend; fuck that noise). I don't whine about it on the forums, but I was a regular old recession statistic for quite awhile, and then made a prospects-reducing career change along the way, from programming to general IT, after a revelatory short-term gig.

So someone else can deal with the crap, instead of the crap not being there in the first place? Someone will have to deal with it, as it is now. Non-employees must bring their own. Even if I were to work up to a point of having some say about that, that's the right decision, at least for anything they carry home with them. What are they likely to purchase? Exactly. So, again, that makes Windows 8's UI decisions no less retarded, which was the point.

The job is actually nice (I'm moving around a lot, dealing with people, there's some travel, my boss is cool, most of the people I work around/for are cool, the commute is short, it's in a good location for midday walks in lieu of going out to eat--I bring my lunch a lot, and eat it in between clicking yes/next, sometimes--etc.), and getting out of it quickly would be bad, both personally and professionally. I do hope it becomes something more, but it would be best for me to get out of it slowly.

I wasn't trying to stir up this kind of response, but rather just let it sink in what your role to the business was/is versus your opinion on that.

I am not going to comment further as I don't think you'd understand. If you want to hash it out, PM me and I will talk about what my opinions / experience is on this.
 

andy2000

Member
Jul 5, 2011
75
20
81
...Half-assed duplication of interfaces like that is confusing, especially to normal users, and quite simply retarded, on MS' part, showing they did pretty much zero research, or user testing, on the matter. They should have either made Metro 100% optional, or done a true merging of new/tablet and old/desktop UIs, as far as the user could see (a new under the hood infrastructure was a good idea, and it would have let them streamline parts, but it needed to work side by side with the old one)...


That's my biggest complaint about Windows 8. I'm not crazy about many of the new design choices, but I would probably get used to them eventually. The thing I can't tolerate is the inconsistency and partial duplication of controls. It seems like nothing in Metro is fully functional. Even after you manage to find the Metro version of a control, chances are it can't do what you want, so you have to go hunting for the old version. At this point, the new interface is just a toy that can't be turned off and can't be used for anything useful. It reminds me of the early versions of Windows that required the use of DOS commands for many things.

Ironically, I like Windows phone (I just wish there were more apps).

Andy
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,967
19
81
Most of the problem with Metro is the audience not realizing its designed with touch-screens in mind. I'd not be surprised to see Kinect come to the PC arena for input devices.

Metro is easily defeatable even for free in the third party market
 

blankslate

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2008
8,659
491
126
Microsoft should have learned the lesson from Vista when companies shipped that OS on inadequate computers.

If Microsoft included an option to go back to a Win7 like interface on computers without a touch screen there would not be as many threads on different forums about how Win 8 sucks (it doesn't but the UI is questionable to say the least).
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |