My Windows 8 Review!!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
I would.

My wife, for example, is quite averse to change. She likes her Win7, hates OSX - never gave it a fair shot when I bought our Mac Mini. She doesn't even really get along with our iPad. Not that she can't use it, she just doesn't like it. She's pretty set in her computing ways.

When I installed Win8 it took her 15 minutes to get the basics. The only real issue she struggled with was switching apps. Once I showed her the different ways, she fell right in to it. She enjoys the metro UI, especially the live tiles. She likes using some of the dedicated site apps - as opposed to having to use the browser - she likes the social integration, notifications, etc...

I like it too. I find the Metro UI pleasing to look at and no obstacle to effectively using the machine. I also like some of the apps quite a bit, social integration, notifications, all that... What I really like are the underhood improvements that seem to get me better battery life, faster boot/resume times, and a generally more responsive and fluid user experience.

Not saying it's perfect. For example, allowing split screen only by thirds in the metro UI is dumb, imo. Especially with widescreen displays.

Still, the only thing I feel like we miss out on with our Zenbook is that it's not a convertible. Until Win8 I generally thought the idea of using touch alongside a full desktop OS was gimmicky. Now I wish I had a touchscreen.

Fair enough, perhaps some people might be fine with it, but I woulnd't even consider recommending it to family or friends, because I know there would be a lot of confused frustrated people asking me for help.
 

arod

Diamond Member
Sep 26, 2000
4,236
0
76
Fair enough, perhaps some people might be fine with it, but I woulnd't even consider recommending it to family or friends, because I know there would be a lot of confused frustrated people asking me for help.

Everybody who asks me for new computer advice is getting pointed directly at surface RT. I am the "support" for my friends and family and the fact that RT is a curated app store and they can't mess up. I will give them a 15 min demo and they will be fine.

Already converted most of my family over to it and every single one of them thinks its better than win7. Then again they are all generally light users but I would bet a vast majority fall into this category.
 

tommo123

Platinum Member
Sep 25, 2005
2,617
48
91
Fair enough, perhaps some people might be fine with it, but I woulnd't even consider recommending it to family or friends, because I know there would be a lot of confused frustrated people asking me for help.

for me, the under the hood stuff in win8 is an improvement. especially the simple copy interface and little things like that. i have having metro shoved down my throat though.

no one has yet offered (for me - whether it's better for someone else is irrelevant as i'm not buying an OS for other peoples needs) a reason why metro is better than the start menu on win7. panels? why do i need them. metro apps? why would i use them over a desktop app?

i don't care about xbox live integration and think the person who thought games for windows live should be shot.

the only reason we're having this new interface is that microsoft can leverage their desktop monopoly to try and get apps written for metro for their phones and tablets. they're scared of being left for dead in the mobile space. simple
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
The point is that you need a reason TO upgrade, not that you need reasons NOT to upgrade. There are very few reasons to upgrade, and a lot of reasons not to. Thus, for most people it would be foolish to upgrade. That's why MS is practically giving it away.

There is zero reason not to. It's faster, smarter when merging files, gives you a more powerful task manager, even uses the same drivers as WIndows 7 (minus a few that are built in and you need to uninstall prior to the upgrade).

Metro is not a reason to avoid WIndows 8 because that is not necessary to even touch on the desktop. You don't even have to see it. You can boot right to desktop.

The point of Metro is this. If you have Surface RT, Metro on your laptop/ultrabook or desktop can run the same apps and sync. If you have a Tablet you use Metro on it syncs with your desktop so you can interact with things in Metro and sync it back to your mobile device if you want. It's there because it will allow someone to carry over whatever they were doing on the tablet to the office, home, or whatever. I am certain Microsoft didn't put it on the desktop thinking everyone would use it as a Metro only device. That's why the desktop exists
 
Last edited:

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
13,274
8,199
136
There is zero reason not to. It's faster, smarter when merging files, gives you a more powerful task manager, even uses the same drivers as WIndows 7 (minus a few that are built in and you need to uninstall prior to the upgrade).

Metro is not a reason to avoid WIndows 8 because that is not necessary to even touch on the desktop. You don't even have to see it. You can boot right to desktop.


I don't know, from what I've seen/read (no first hand experience, mind!) the speed differences are negligable. I don't care about saving a few seconds on boot up. I don't know what the merging files advantage is (mind you, I've always been irritated by the way windows handles copying folders into each other, so if that's what's been fixed, that is a valid point!). The task manager is definitely an improvement from what I've heard/read. And it seems there are some security improvements also.

And, yeah, it looks like most of the unwanted metro stuff can be ignored anyway.

But, you know, no start menu! And hence no sensible way to organise shortcuts in folders. That just puts me right off. I don't want 3rd party utilities, because they can be flakey or get broken with MS updates.
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
How to create a folder and put app shortcuts in the Windows 8 start menu. It works, for those of you familiar with Steam you know it doesn't create a start menu folder by itself (at least I know for sure it does not when you install on a secondary drive). However, I created a folder called Valve with a steam shortcut inside it.



There are one or two ways. What I did, was entered, in Windows explorer,
Programdata - Microsoft - Windows - Start menu - Programs.
There I created my folders (My example - Entertainment - Office - Internet - Photo. etc..)
Each of these I right clicked and pinned to the start menu. I then dragged my programs into the appropriate folder.
You can also arrange you shortcuts into the required groups. Click the small minus sign, bottom right.
In the small picture you then see, right click each group and you will have an option n to name the group(s)

Here's what I mean by smarter merging of folders. It's more streamlined and seems to understand what you're doing more easily. No need to click "do this for the next xx conflicts"

 
Last edited:

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
13,274
8,199
136
How to create a folder and put app shortcuts in the Windows 8 start menu.



Here's what I mean by smarter merging of folders. It's more streamlined and seems to understand what you're doing more easily. No need to click "do this for the next xx conflicts"


I think that is what I'm thinking of. its when you copy a folder with subfolders into another folder with subfolders, and it tells you folders have the same name, and then only gives youy options to overwrite everything or do nothing. I want the chance to tell it which files to overwrite or to just copy the files that aren't already in the target folder.

This has annoyed me for years! Why does it take them so long to fix such things, eh?
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
I think that is what I'm thinking of. its when you copy a folder with subfolders into another folder with subfolders, and it tells you folders have the same name, and then only gives youy options to overwrite everything or do nothing. I want the chance to tell it which files to overwrite or to just copy the files that aren't already in the target folder.

This has annoyed me for years! Why does it take them so long to fix such things, eh?

Well, it works now. You can just let it replace everything, skip the duplicates, or it will allow you to pick and choose each one.

How about that adding a folder to the start menu? Works pretty nicely.
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
13,274
8,199
136
Well, it works now. You can just let it replace everything, skip the duplicates, or it will allow you to pick and choose each one.

How about that adding a folder to the start menu? Works pretty nicely.

Well, that' is a point in favour of win 8, though I don't entirely get why it couldn't have just been added to win 7 via an SP or even included in XP or Vista as its been an obvious annoyance since 9x.

Maybe the start menu folder work-around would be sufficient - still wouldn't handle sub-folders as elegantly as the start menu with cascading menus, but it might be acceptable in return for the various plus points of win 8. Sheesh, this is so finely balanced! Argh.
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
No there's no reliable way to do something similar to cascade. Folders inside of other folders pinned to the start menu won't appear on the start menu.
 

Blueychan

Senior member
Feb 1, 2008
602
0
76
Thanks for the link, that's some interesting information on some of the aspects of Win 8 that might not be known.

From an everyday use perspective though, the functionality and UI are king, and Win 8 fails horribly in both those departments.

Looks like Win 8 is just the gimpy first step towards a much better future OS.

That's an upgrade.

We have a disconnect here. When I hear "Retail", I think of full standalone version.
 

quikah

Diamond Member
Apr 7, 2003
4,085
663
126
3) it's still a joke complaint about icon spacing because I can pretty much guarantee it's not there because aero is gone and we knew that for a long time. Most of those adjustments affect aero.

This has nothing to do with Aero, these settings have been in Windows for a LONG time, they are in XP, probably earlier but cannot confirm.
 

HeXen

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2009
7,832
38
91
One fact i'm sure we can all agree on, is the fact for average joe, the shutdown menu isn't intuitive to figure out by any means. I think a shutdown icon itself in the charms menu would be more appropriate than hidden within charms/settings/power.
shutting down really isn't something that is configurational, its a performing action so doesn't really belong to a settings menu
 

Mem

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
21,476
13
81
One fact i'm sure we can all agree on, is the fact for average joe, the shutdown menu isn't intuitive to figure out by any means. I think a shutdown icon itself in the charms menu would be more appropriate than hidden within charms/settings/power.
shutting down really isn't something that is configurational, its a performing action so doesn't really belong to a settings menu

I agree,when I first installed Win8 beta and played with it took me awhile to figure where the shut down settings were,why they could of not stuck it somewhere better is beyond me,however I've added it and restart to Win+X and also added both to Metro tiles,lot more sensible place.



http://www.howtogeek.com/77061/how-to-add-shutdown-restart-sleep-to-the-windows-8-metro-start-screen/




http://www.howtogeek.com/113775/add-shutdown-and-reboot-to-the-windows-8-winx-menu/
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
One fact i'm sure we can all agree on, is the fact for average joe, the shutdown menu isn't intuitive to figure out by any means. I think a shutdown icon itself in the charms menu would be more appropriate than hidden within charms/settings/power.
shutting down really isn't something that is configurational, its a performing action so doesn't really belong to a settings menu

It's not there readily available as the control panels aren't because it's trying to limit how much someone with very little computer skills can mess with on the PC. Those who want it can always find it and will know how to search for the solution to obtain the desired functionality, but for Grandma she doesn't need to log out or access the administrative tools the like. Shut down? I've never shuit down my PC since I built it.
 

gizbug

Platinum Member
May 14, 2001
2,621
0
76
Another one of these threads? 2 hours and you gave up on it? Yawn
Nothing to see here, move along.
 

stevech

Senior member
Jul 18, 2010
203
0
0
Even if win8 were free, too much of my time would be wasted farting with it. since as a desktop user who would get no benefit for the hassle of changing from win7.

good luck to MS in the tablet-wars. The phone war is between warriors other than MS.
 

Carfax83

Diamond Member
Nov 1, 2010
6,841
1,536
136
2) How many years have we known IE is inferior yet people still think suddenly it'll be great. It's not, probably never will be. At least not to me. Try it and see on every new version. I do, but then I'm right back to something else. Still, it's not worth complaining because there's Opera, Chrome, Firefox, even Safari and some others if you don't like it.

Whats with all the IE10 hate? I have both IE10 and Chrome on my computer, and I prefer IE10 by far. IE10 is much faster than IE9, and slightly faster than Chrome.
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
There is zero reason not to.

That's just plain factually wrong. For one, you have to pay to upgrade. You have to go through the hassle of upgrading. You have to spend time to do the upgrade. You will lose some functionality and features. You will have to get a key to download and install Windows Media Center separately. You will have to boot into the crappy metro ui before you can go to the desktop. You will have to install a third party solution if you want your start button functionality back. Those are all valid reasons not to upgrade.

On the other side of the ledger, there are some good reasons to upgrade, including drive pooling, increased security, a better task manager and so forth.

The point of Metro is this. If you have Surface RT, Metro on your laptop/ultrabook or desktop can run the same apps and sync. If you have a Tablet you use Metro on it syncs with your desktop so you can interact with things in Metro and sync it back to your mobile device if you want. It's there because it will allow someone to carry over whatever they were doing on the tablet to the office, home, or whatever. I am certain Microsoft didn't put it on the desktop thinking everyone would use it as a Metro only device. That's why the desktop exists

I understand what the point of metro is, it's MS's attempt to stay relevant as the world moves towards more mobile devices. Personally that does nothing for me because the mobile devices I use have android or ios on them. Thus it really boils down to "is there any good reason to upgrade to 8?", and the answer is a resounding "no" at this point, unless someone has some killer new feature that I'm not aware of yet.
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
One fact i'm sure we can all agree on, is the fact for average joe, the shutdown menu isn't intuitive to figure out by any means. I think a shutdown icon itself in the charms menu would be more appropriate than hidden within charms/settings/power.
shutting down really isn't something that is configurational, its a performing action so doesn't really belong to a settings menu

This kind of sums up all of win 8 at this point: Some interesting/nice features, but it feels like something that wasn't thought through and isn't quite fully baked yet. It's a stepping stone to a better future product.
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
That's just plain factually wrong. For one, you have to pay to upgrade. You have to go through the hassle of upgrading. You have to spend time to do the upgrade. You will lose some functionality and features. You will have to get a key to download and install Windows Media Center separately. You will have to boot into the crappy metro ui before you can go to the desktop. You will have to install a third party solution if you want your start button functionality back. Those are all valid reasons not to upgrade.

On the other side of the ledger, there are some good reasons to upgrade, including drive pooling, increased security, a better task manager and so forth.



I understand what the point of metro is, it's MS's attempt to stay relevant as the world moves towards more mobile devices. Personally that does nothing for me because the mobile devices I use have android or ios on them. Thus it really boils down to "is there any good reason to upgrade to 8?", and the answer is a resounding "no" at this point, unless someone has some killer new feature that I'm not aware of yet.

There's no hassle, just let it work. It takes a bit of time yes but it's just a couple clicks and it's ready to go. With Classic Shell or Start8 and other options you don't have to see Metro. Some of the 3rd party tools are free and they will boot you into the desktop and bypass the Metro UI entirely. The Windows 8 start menu does what I needed it to do. I was using the WIndows7 menu but I switched for a few hours yesterday and found it to work just as well. The only reason I have Start8 installed at this point is because it adds a start menu icon I can simply click. I could live without it but I like the icon down in the task bar.
Whats with all the IE10 hate? I have both IE10 and Chrome on my computer, and I prefer IE10 by far. IE10 is much faster than IE9, and slightly faster than Chrome.

Chrome has more functionality, firefox too. Speed is only a minor thing, and it's ms difference. I just do not like how IE functions and looks. I switched away long ago and settled on Chrome for the time being. Was a firefox user for years. I don't see IE catching up to Chrome and the other browsers when HTML5 is more mainstream either.
 
Last edited:

HeXen

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2009
7,832
38
91
It's not there readily available as the control panels aren't because it's trying to limit how much someone with very little computer skills can mess with on the PC. Those who want it can always find it and will know how to search for the solution to obtain the desired functionality, but for Grandma she doesn't need to log out or access the administrative tools the like. Shut down? I've never shuit down my PC since I built it.

wat? If anyone's grandma just leaves the desktop on till it suspends itself then all I can say is how wasteful, less she folds or something. Either way, it doesn't belong under settings. That is like exiting a video game by going into a main menu first, then clicking on Configurations, then Exit. Exit being a non configurational operation.
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
wat? If anyone's grandma just leaves the desktop on till it suspends itself then all I can say is how wasteful, less she folds or something. Either way, it doesn't belong under settings. That is like exiting a video game by going into a main menu first, then clicking on Configurations, then Exit. Exit being a non configurational operation.

Waste? it's chump change. I never turn off any of my computers unless I'm working on it. No point to do so. We do use sleep mode which kicks on after a time but never ever a full shut down. I advise my grandmother to do the same with her computer. Just let it go to sleep, it's barely using any power in that state. Not enough for you to worry about a surprise on the next power bill. Then there's no wait time for it to be in a useable state. Just move the mouse and start working in seconds.

Still, I am confident it's hidden to give the user of RT less options to make it appear simpler. Sounds stupid and it may be for a desktop but they plopped Metro on top of the desktop OS and that's how it is...
 
Last edited:
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |