Need candidate info

[RESmonkey]

I guess I'll go with Hillary and Obama. Now, where can I get some "valid sources" on these guys? No wikipedia, even if it is accurate.

 

[Legend]

Obama was against the war, Clinton voted for everything aggressive for the war but claims to be against it. That's basically the only major difference.

Oh yeah, Clinton likes to play dirty and cry a lot.

 

[RESmonkey]

Hmm...what else are the 'big" things I need to know?

 

[BradT]

Obama will win, Billary won't.

 

[RESmonkey]

Now that I think about it, why do I even have Hillary Clinton 08 in my sig? I only put that there because she will undo the stem cell veto :0

 

[RESmonkey]

This random googling pissess me off. Can I have a link to a valid source that highlights each candidate?

 

[waffleironhead]

Do your own homework!

/end thread

 

[HN]

http://www.2decide.com/table.htm

 

[Epic Fail]

Is this for real?

 

[RESmonkey]

Yes, I really have no clue about the candidates. I'm only going to vote for Hillary (so far) because of a single interest.

 

[Aluvus]

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/

http://www.barackobama.com/index.php

 

[RESmonkey]

OMG, after looking at the table, who in their right mind would vote for Ron paul?

 

[RESmonkey]

Hmmm...Hillary/Obama = bad paper. I'll do Hillary vs Ron Paul. Ron Paul seems like the devil reincarnated.

 

[touchmyichi]

This is literally the easiest topic in the world to research right now, do your homework .

 

[RagingBITCH]

Does Google fail you that much? No, you just fail at the internet.

 

[RESmonkey]

Hmmm...actually, I'll go hillary vs giuliani.

I can google. I just need "valid" sources. I wasn't sure what was valid or not.

 

[BigJ]

Rudy dropped out man.

 

[SSSnail]

Why don't you head over to P&N? Complete with talking points, spins and FUDs, for free.

 

[RESmonkey]

Ron paul it is then. I will bash him in the article.

 

[Epic Fail]

Originally posted by: RESmonkey
Hmmm...actually, I'll go hillary vs giuliani.

I can google. I just need "valid" sources. I wasn't sure what was valid or not.

This thread is Patriot Fail.

 

[Legend]

Originally posted by: RESmonkey
Ron paul it is then. I will bash him in the article.

Careful. If you have a political science teacher, you're going to get owned. Paul's positions look odd from a top level, but they're deeply rooted in Austrian Economics, consistent fiscal conservatism, and a strict representation of the US Constitution. Political Science teachers would be very keen on spotting holes on arguing against Paul.

So for example, Paul strictly believes in the Constitution. Therefore, he strictly believes that anything not granted in terms of power to the Federal Government (granted to states) he will oppose it at a Federal level. He's extremely principled, so if a bill comes in that has a ton of good ideas in it, and it also contains a small section that is unconstitutional, he will vote against it.

 

[BudAshes]

Originally posted by: Legend

Originally posted by: RESmonkey
Ron paul it is then. I will bash him in the article.

Careful. If you have a political science teacher, you're going to get owned. Paul's positions look odd from a top level, but they're deeply rooted in Austrian Economics, consistent fiscal conservatism, and a strict representation of the US Constitution. Political Science teachers would be very keen on spotting holes on arguing against Paul.

So for example, Paul strictly believes in the Constitution. Therefore, he strictly believes that anything not granted in terms of power to the Federal Government (granted to states) he will oppose it at a Federal level. He's extremely principled, so if a bill comes in that has a ton of good ideas in it, and it also contains a small section that is unconstitutional, he will vote against it.

I think ron paul is really ross perot after he got his ears trimmed.

 

[Legend]

Originally posted by: BudAshes

Originally posted by: Legend

Originally posted by: RESmonkey
Ron paul it is then. I will bash him in the article.

Careful. If you have a political science teacher, you're going to get owned. Paul's positions look odd from a top level, but they're deeply rooted in Austrian Economics, consistent fiscal conservatism, and a strict representation of the US Constitution. Political Science teachers would be very keen on spotting holes on arguing against Paul.

So for example, Paul strictly believes in the Constitution. Therefore, he strictly believes that anything not granted in terms of power to the Federal Government (granted to states) he will oppose it at a Federal level. He's extremely principled, so if a bill comes in that has a ton of good ideas in it, and it also contains a small section that is unconstitutional, he will vote against it.

I think ron paul is really ross perot after he got his ears trimmed.

Well, completely different policies. But I wouldn't mind him becoming the next Perot if Obama gets the Democratic nomination. All of the other candidates would fuck things up too much. Obama would be an okay status quo damage control president.

Just warning the OP that if he makes a paper that says "Ron Paul is crazy because he wants to get rid of the income tax, because that's crazy and how could we pay for the War on Terror." or something like that, that a political science teacher that understands the platforms would tear up that paper with red ink.

 

[everman]

You can analogize each candidate (from either side) to heaping piles of cow dung, and compare how one stinks in their own special way. You may also substitute the cow for some other animal that preferably creates heaping piles of steaming crap in one sitting that no neighbor would want to find on their front porch, on fire, in a paper bag.