Ok this one math class is killing me. I go sit in class everyday and everything he says goes over my head. At first I thought I was the only one but even the people who I thought were smart apparently have some difficulty understanding the logic behind what he is teaching. The math class I'm talking about is this (taken directly from the university catalog):
Introduction to Mathematical Analysis I
Rigorous study of calculus and its foundations. Structure of the real number system. Sequences and series of numbers. Limits, continuity, and differentiability of functions of one real variable.
I've taken all the pre-req to the class and some of the stuff he talks about are still confusing. He writes his own book and that is what he uses. It was a rushed job so the grammars are off and I guess some of the symbols are wrong as well. But I guess what really bugs me is I cannot grasp an understanding of the importance or basic logic of why we prove the things we prove. Can anyone who has taken this class or something similar (based on the description I gave of the course) point me towards the textbook they used? I think I need to refer to a second source outside of his book if I really want to understand this stuff. And it would be really helpful if the book has pictures and a good explanation of the purposes of the proofs.
Introduction to Mathematical Analysis I
Rigorous study of calculus and its foundations. Structure of the real number system. Sequences and series of numbers. Limits, continuity, and differentiability of functions of one real variable.
I've taken all the pre-req to the class and some of the stuff he talks about are still confusing. He writes his own book and that is what he uses. It was a rushed job so the grammars are off and I guess some of the symbols are wrong as well. But I guess what really bugs me is I cannot grasp an understanding of the importance or basic logic of why we prove the things we prove. Can anyone who has taken this class or something similar (based on the description I gave of the course) point me towards the textbook they used? I think I need to refer to a second source outside of his book if I really want to understand this stuff. And it would be really helpful if the book has pictures and a good explanation of the purposes of the proofs.