Why don't you name those who you think are anti-Semitic in here instead of a cowardly insult? And what in your opinion makes one an anti-semite? Disagreeing with Israeli policies?
A question for the anti-semites here. Iran has called for the destruction of Israel. What should Netanyahu do about that?
A question for the anti-semites here. Iran has called for the destruction of Israel. What should Netanyahu do about that?
A question for the anti-semites here. Iran has called for the destruction of Israel. What should Netanyahu do about that?
A question for the anti-semites here. Iran has called for the destruction of Israel. What should Netanyahu do about that?
The current President of Iran has called for the destruction of Israel?
The current President of Iran has called for the destruction of Israel?
The current President of Iran has called for the destruction of Israel?
A question for the anti-semites here. Iran has called for the destruction of Israel. What should Netanyahu do about that?
Don't know about Netanyahu, but Obama + Dems are likely to pave the way for them.
When has nuclear proliferation ever been stopped?
Do people really believe Iran would launch a weapon? Or provide one to a terrorist group? Im convinced they want a weapon because their neighbors have been invaded, conquered and destroyed by the United States. We have made it perfectly clear the best way to keep us from destroying your nation is if you hold a nuclear weapon.
We have made it perfectly clear the best way to keep us from destroying your nation is if you hold a nuclear weapon.
A question for the anti-semites here. Iran has called for the destruction of Israel. What should Netanyahu do about that?
If Iran were to become a nuclear power, the most immediate question would be what it means for Israel, where warnings have reached histrionic heights.
"Absolutely nothing will happen," says Martin Van Creveld, an Israeli historian and author of some 20 books on military strategy. "Israel has what it takes to deter Iran, and the Iranians know it."
Mr. Van Creveld is implying that Israel's own nuclear arsenal of an estimated 200 warheads would prevent any Iranian first strike. Israel has the only such arsenal in the Middle East, and – unlike Iran's program – it has never been subject to UN inspection or safeguards.
"If I was an Iranian national security planner, I would want nuclear weapons," Bruce Riedel, a 30-year veteran of the CIA now at the Brookings Institution in Washington, said in January.
"Look at the neighborhood that I live in: Everyone else has nuclear weapons who matters; and those who don't, don't matter, and get invaded by the United States of America," Mr. Riedel said on a panel hosted by the Atlantic Council, a Washington think tank.
Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu's view in 2012 that Iran was a year away from being able to make a nuclear bomb was not shared by his own intelligence service, a leaked cable suggests.
Do people really believe Iran would launch a weapon? Or provide one to a terrorist group?
Uh, yes. That's the whole reason for the controversy.
If Iran were considered trustworthy and normal, we wouldn't be having this argument.
The whole problem with Iran getting the bomb is that they might use it.
We certainly can't be trusted with the bomb because we HAVE USED IT, TWICE.
Uh, yes. That's the whole reason for the controversy.
If Iran were considered trustworthy and normal, we wouldn't be having this argument.
The whole problem with Iran getting the bomb is that they might use it.
Homer we both know that Iran has done this multiple times, their current President maybe not, I know that guy did acknowledge the holocaust actually happened. We also both know that the President of Iran is essentially a figure head job the real power to rule is with the Ayatollah.
http://www.charismanews.com/world/4...enei-tweets-9-point-plan-to-annihilate-israel
This is not agreeing with the purpose of todays speech or even say its the right thing to do.
Uh, yes. That's the whole reason for the controversy.
If Iran were considered trustworthy and normal, we wouldn't be having this argument.
The whole problem with Iran getting the bomb is that they might use it.
This has never been a convincing argument. It implies that you believe that Iran's government is willing to commit suicide in order to nuke Israel, meaning that the leadership of Iran is totally irrational. There's absolutely no evidence that's the case.
I doubt even Netanyahu believes Iran would actually nuke Israel. It's just that "stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon because it will hurt our strategic interests in the Middle East" isn't nearly as pithy.
Yes, for very good reasons.
Is North Korea considered to be trustworthy and normal?
The only good reason was because we had it and they didn't.
Except for their incendiary rhetoric. It seems to me given that rhetoric, we have to weigh the cost of them going without the bomb against the cost of them nuking Israel. Why should they get the bomb? This is not an ally of ours.
If I accept that what you say about Netanyahu's beliefs is true, then it raises the question of why a threat to Israel's security interests is insufficient justification to inhibit Iran's interests.