I just watched the whole series in one day, OMFG, I have seen some serious dodgey stuff reported of US cops before, however this takes the cake.
Len K and his investigator..The stuff they say about the Averys, he dont even know them. (Evil people inbreeding?)The Judge on Stevens case when sentencing goes on about his history?..what history, that he was wrongly convicted and put away for 18 yrs, or did he just ignore that when he was stating that his crimes were giving worse?.
The poor boy Brendan railroaded and the DA stated 2 different things in each case, one that Steven did, 2nd case that Brendan was involved!.
Im with Impule regarding some of the evidance too!.
Thing is...garage wasn't clean, neither was the house. Look at the photos. Things there hadn't been touched in ages. What was the bullet doing in there with no blood anywhere?
Also:
No DNA of Theresa anywhere in the home or the garage (EXCEPT for the bullet in the garage, that mysteriously had DNA, but not blood DNA)
No DNA of Brenden in the house or garage.
No fingerprints from Avery or Dassey on/in the vehicle but there was blood drops and some sort of (sweat?) DNA of Avery's under the hood.
No DNA from Theresa on her own key, but Avery's was on it. (TH Spare key?)
Bones found in 3 locations (1 of which was off the property) (The heat to incinerate the bone would of taken 12+ hours and the smell of burning flesh wasnt smelt by anyone?)
No evidence of bleach used to clean up said blood
No evidence of bed sheets/blankets/etc in burn piles
Now, let's say he did clean the garage meticulously, or even the house. Then, he would have had to burn the body and her possessions.
One could say he stashed the car quickly meaning to come back for it, and not thinking anyone would actually find it in that lot. (The mindset being he had time because no one knew to look there).
But...
I will play both sides by saying. All the so called evidence in the old case said he was guilty too. So...makes you wonder how concrete some of the existing evidence is considering all the motive to make him disappear and the story related to how he was convicted before (as in...basically all evidence was made to look like it was him). Like the sheriff said, would have been easier to just kill him, because that wouldn't have looked suspicious or anything with a 35million dollar lawsuit or anything. (ie: that would have definitely pointed to them as motive).
Why was TH blood in the car boot area?, was it used to transport the body and why, and seriously who would be dumb enough to burn a body out in the open right by your bedroom windows FFS!
I dont know if Steven did it, but dont understand why he would anyway, he was going for 36m against the county sheriff dept and it was looking good for him. He was in a relationship!
Lastly, WTF is the point of the appeal court if they cant even see how badly the trials were conducted.
Edit - Having thought about it, I would have to say that I think SA & BD are innocent, the reason being that the evidence they do have with the burned bones, car on peoperty and the blood in it are too obvious. Where is the difficult evidence, the blood splatter etc, who smelt the burning body? after all, BD was convicted of cutting up the body, no weapons found, no other DNA anywhere.
To me, car keys, car on the property with his blood is just too pat!